Vehicles: local regulations: street closures.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 332 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 332.
You're tracking AB 332
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 332 — Vehicles: local regulations: street closures.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 34, Statutes of 2017.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 07, 2017. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
3 sponsors
1 primary, 2 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law authorizes the legislative body of a local agency to temporarily close to through traffic a highway under its jurisdiction in order to curb serious and continual criminal activity along that highway, subject to certain requirements, including the condition that the highway recommended for closure not be designated as a through highway or arterial street. This bill would authorize the legislative body of a local agency to additionally temporarily close to through traffic a highway under its jurisdiction in order to curb illegal dumping. The bill would also allow a temporary closure of a highway that has been designated as a through highway or arterial street if the closure can be accomplished without a significant impact on the flow of traffic.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 06/28/17 - Chaptered Current pdf June 28, 2017
- Enrolled 06/19/17 - Enrolled pdf June 19, 2017
- Amended 05/30/17 - Amended Senate pdf May 30, 2017
- Amended 03/09/17 - Amended Assembly pdf March 09, 2017
- Introduced 02/07/17 - Introduced pdf February 07, 2017
- AB332 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 34, Statutes of 2017.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 2 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 2221.).
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after June 14 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 1487.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (June 6).
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on T. & H.
-
Referred to Com. on T. & H.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 1136.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 5).
-
Coauthors revised.
-
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 10.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Bocanegra · Primary
- Ridley-Thomas · Cosponsor
- Voepel · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 119 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Bocanegra
Co-sponsors (2)
- Ridley-Thomas
- Voepel
Not signed on (119)
119 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 119 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 33 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 38 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Newman | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Not Voting |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 332 do?
- Existing law authorizes the legislative body of a local agency to temporarily close to through traffic a highway under its jurisdiction in order to curb serious and continual criminal activity along that highway, subject to certain requirements, including the condition that the highway recommended for closure not be designated as a through highway or arterial street. This bill would authorize the legislative body of a local agency to additionally temporarily close to through traffic a highway under its jurisdiction in order to curb illegal dumping. The bill would also allow a temporary closure of a highway that has been designated as a through highway or arterial street if the closure can be accomplished without a significant impact on the flow of traffic.
- Who sponsors AB 332?
- AB 332 is sponsored by Bocanegra, Ridley-Thomas, and Voepel.
- What is the current status of AB 332?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 07, 2017. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 332?
- Track AB 332 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 332
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 332
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →