AB 652 — Property taxation: base year value: new construction.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 80, Statutes of 2017.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 14, 2017. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 5 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) The California Constitution generally limits the maximum amount of any ad valorem tax on real property to 1% of its full cash value and defines "full cash value" for these purposes as the county assessor's valuation of real property as shown on the 1975–76 tax bill under "full cash value" or, thereafter, the appraised value of real property when purchased, newly constructed, or a change in ownership has occurred after the 1975 assessment. Existing property tax law requires the assessor to determine a new base year value for the portion of any taxable real property which has been newly constructed and that new construction in progress on the lien date be appraised at its full value on that date, and each lien date thereafter, until construction is completed, at which time the entire portion of property which is newly constructed is reappraised at its full value. This bill would instead prohibit new construction that is in progress from acquiring a new base year value until the date of completion. (2) Existing property tax law prescribes procedures by which a taxpayer may seek a reduction in assessment from the county board of equalization or assessment appeals board or, in the case of certain publicly owned property, the State Board of Equalization, including deadlines for filing an application. Existing property tax law provides that an application for reduction in the base year value of an assessment on the current local roll may be filed during the regular filing period for that year, as provided and subject to certain limitations, including that the base year value determined in accordance with specified law is conclusively presumed to be the base year value unless the application is filed during the regular equalization period for the year in which the assessment is placed on the assessment roll or in any of the 3 succeeding years. This bill would authorize an application for reduction in the value of new construction that is in progress on the lien date on the current roll to be filed during the regular filing period for that year, as provided. The bill would authorize an application for reduction in the base year value determined upon completion of new construction to be filed during the regular equalization period for the year in which the assessment is placed on the assessment roll or in any of the 3 succeeding years. (3) Existing law requires the state to reimburse local agencies annually for certain property tax revenues lost as a result of any exemption or classification of property for purposes of ad valorem property taxation. This bill would provide that, notwithstanding those provisions, no appropriation is made and the state shall not reimburse local agencies for property tax revenues lost by them pursuant to the bill. (4) By changing the manner in which assessors determine the base year value for new construction in progress, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. (5) This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 07/21/17 - Chaptered Current pdf July 21, 2017
- Enrolled 07/06/17 - Enrolled pdf July 06, 2017
- Amended 04/03/17 - Amended Assembly pdf April 03, 2017
- Introduced 02/14/17 - Introduced pdf February 14, 2017
- AB652 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 80, Statutes of 2017.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 11:30 a.m.
-
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 33. Noes 0. Page 1842.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 7). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 1391.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (April 26).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 17). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on REV. & TAX. Read second time and amended.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 17.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Heath Flora · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Flora, Heath Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 29 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 33 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| % of votes cast | 83% | 0% | 0% | 18% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Not Voting |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Not Voting |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Not Voting |
| Allen | — | Not Voting |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Newman | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Not Voting |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 54 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 76 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Acosta | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Not Voting |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Not Voting |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Not Voting |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Yea |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 16 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 0% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 652 do?
- (1) The California Constitution generally limits the maximum amount of any ad valorem tax on real property to 1% of its full cash value and defines "full cash value" for these purposes as the county assessor's valuation of real property as shown on the 1975–76 tax bill under "full cash value" or, thereafter, the appraised value of real property when purchased, newly constructed, or a change in ownership has occurred after the 1975 assessment. Existing property tax law requires the assessor to determine a new base year value for the portion of any taxable real property which has been newly constructed and that new construction in progress on the lien date be appraised at its full value on that date, and each lien date thereafter, until construction is completed, at which time the entire portion of property which is newly constructed is reappraised at its full value. This bill would instead prohibit new construction that is in progress from acquiring a new base year value until the date of completion. (2) Existing property tax law prescribes procedures by which a taxpayer may seek a reduction in assessment from the county board of equalization or assessment appeals board or, in the case of certain publicly owned property, the State Board of Equalization, including deadlines for filing an application. Existing property tax law provides that an application for reduction in the base year value of an assessment on the current local roll may be filed during the regular filing period for that year, as provided and subject to certain limitations, including that the base year value determined in accordance with specified law is conclusively presumed to be the base year value unless the application is filed during the regular equalization period for the year in which the assessment is placed on the assessment roll or in any of the 3 succeeding years. This bill would authorize an application for reduction in the value of new construction that is in progress on the lien date on the current roll to be filed during the regular filing period for that year, as provided. The bill would authorize an application for reduction in the base year value determined upon completion of new construction to be filed during the regular equalization period for the year in which the assessment is placed on the assessment roll or in any of the 3 succeeding years. (3) Existing law requires the state to reimburse local agencies annually for certain property tax revenues lost as a result of any exemption or classification of property for purposes of ad valorem property taxation. This bill would provide that, notwithstanding those provisions, no appropriation is made and the state shall not reimburse local agencies for property tax revenues lost by them pursuant to the bill. (4) By changing the manner in which assessors determine the base year value for new construction in progress, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. (5) This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.
- Who sponsors AB 652?
- AB 652 is sponsored by Flora, Heath (Republican).
- What is the current status of AB 652?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 14, 2017. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 652?
- Track AB 652 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 652
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 652
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →