California 2017-2018 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate

SB 573 — Student financial aid: student service programs.

Last action — Ordered to third reading.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Under existing law, the 3 segments of public postsecondary education in this state are the University of California, under the administration of the Regents of the University of California, the California State University, under the administration of the Trustees of the California State University, and the California Community Colleges, under the administration of the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges. Existing law establishes various student financial aid programs, including the California Work-Study Program, which provides eligible college and university students with the opportunity to earn money to help defray their educational costs, while gaining experience in educationally beneficial or career-related employment. This bill would authorize the trustees, the board of governors, and the regents to develop, for each of their respective campuses, a student service program, as specified, for students with financial need who are exempt from paying nonresident tuition under a certain provision of law. The bill would establish that personal information of a student collected or obtained for the student service program is confidential, shall not be open to the public for inspection or disclosed without the written consent of the student, and shall only be collected, used, and retained to determine a student's eligibility for the program or to administer the program, and would prohibit disclosure of that personal information to any other person, except as provided. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. The California Constitution requires local agencies, for the purpose of ensuring public access to the meetings of public bodies and the writings of public officials and agencies, to comply with a statutory enactment that amends or enacts laws relating to public records or open meetings and contains findings demonstrating that the enactment furthers the constitutional requirements relating to this purpose. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Ordered to third reading.

  2. From inactive file.

  3. Notice of intention to remove from inactive file given by Assembly Member Calderon.

  4. Ordered to inactive file on request of Assembly Member Calderon.

  5. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  6. Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  7. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 5.) (September 1).

  8. August 23 set for first hearing. Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  9. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 3.) (July 11). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  10. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.

  11. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.

  12. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on HIGHER ED. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) (June 27).

  13. Re-referred to Coms. on JUD. and HIGHER ED. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.

  14. Referred to Coms. on HIGHER ED. and JUD.

  15. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  16. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 28. Noes 12. Page 1349.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  17. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  18. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 1187.) (May 25).

  19. Set for hearing May 25.

  20. May 15 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  21. Set for hearing May 15.

  22. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  23. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 853.) (April 25).

  24. Set for hearing April 25.

  25. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 783.) (April 19). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  26. Set for hearing April 19.

  27. Re-referred to Coms. on ED. and JUD.

  28. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  29. Referred to Com. on RLS.

  30. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 23.

  31. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Lara · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 6 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Lara

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Do pass as amended.

Passed 11 Yea · 5 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 8401
Democratic 3000
Republican 0100
Total 11501
% of votes cast 65%29%0%6%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Bigelow — Nay
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Nay
Gonzalez Fletcher — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Fong — Nay
Gray — Not Voting
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Chau — Yea
Obernolte — Nay
Eggman — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

Passed 10 Yea · 3 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 7200
Republican 0100
Democratic 3000
Total 10300
% of votes cast 77%23%0%0%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Baker — Nay
Weber — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Kiley — Nay
Levine — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Low — Yea
Medina — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Choi, Steven S. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Higher Education]

Passed 7 Yea · 2 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 5202
Democratic 2000
Total 7202
% of votes cast 64%18%0%18%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Holden — Not Voting
Maienschein — Nay
Chau — Yea
Kiley — Nay
Chiu — Yea
Ting — Yea
Cunningham — Not Voting
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

3rd Reading

Passed 28 Yea · 12 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 241100
Democratic 4100
Total 281200
% of votes cast 70%30%0%0%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Hernandez — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Lara — Yea
Monning — Yea
Newman — Yea
Pan — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Roth — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Allen — Yea
Bradford — Yea
De León — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Hill — Yea
Moorlach — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Vidak — Nay
Wilk — Nay
Anderson — Nay
Bates — Nay
Beall — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Galgiani — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Mark Stone — Nay
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Nay
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

labor education
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 573 do?
Under existing law, the 3 segments of public postsecondary education in this state are the University of California, under the administration of the Regents of the University of California, the California State University, under the administration of the Trustees of the California State University, and the California Community Colleges, under the administration of the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges. Existing law establishes various student financial aid programs, including the California Work-Study Program, which provides eligible college and university students with the opportunity to earn money to help defray their educational costs, while gaining experience in educationally beneficial or career-related employment. This bill would authorize the trustees, the board of governors, and the regents to develop, for each of their respective campuses, a student service program, as specified, for students with financial need who are exempt from paying nonresident tuition under a certain provision of law. The bill would establish that personal information of a student collected or obtained for the student service program is confidential, shall not be open to the public for inspection or disclosed without the written consent of the student, and shall only be collected, used, and retained to determine a student's eligibility for the program or to administer the program, and would prohibit disclosure of that personal information to any other person, except as provided. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. The California Constitution requires local agencies, for the purpose of ensuring public access to the meetings of public bodies and the writings of public officials and agencies, to comply with a statutory enactment that amends or enacts laws relating to public records or open meetings and contains findings demonstrating that the enactment furthers the constitutional requirements relating to this purpose. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.
Who sponsors SB 573?
SB 573 is sponsored by Lara.
What is the current status of SB 573?
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 573?
Track SB 573 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 573

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 573

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →