Domestic violence: protective orders.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 204 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 204.
You're tracking SB 204
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 204 — Domestic violence: protective orders.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 98, Statutes of 2017.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 31, 2017. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 3 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law provides for the issuance and enforcement of protective orders in cases involving domestic violence. Existing law provides for a Uniform Interstate Enforcement of Domestic Violence Protection Orders Act, which authorizes the enforcement of a valid foreign protection order in a tribunal of this state under certain conditions. Existing law establishes a Domestic Violence Restraining Order System for purposes of registering protection orders, as specified, which is administered by the Department of Justice. This bill would enact the Uniform Recognition and Enforcement of Canadian Domestic Violence Protection Orders Act, which would authorize the enforcement of a valid Canadian domestic violence protection order in a tribunal of this state under certain conditions. The bill would prescribe the criteria for a determination of the validity of a protection order under these provisions, as specified, and would authorize the registration of such a protection order in the Domestic Violence Restraining Order System. The bill would require a law enforcement officer of this state to enforce a protection order under these provisions upon determining that there is probable cause to believe that a valid protection order exists and has been violated. By imposing new duties on law enforcement agencies, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 07/21/17 - Chaptered Current pdf July 21, 2017
- Enrolled 07/11/17 - Enrolled pdf July 11, 2017
- Amended 06/20/17 - Amended Assembly pdf June 20, 2017
- Amended 06/08/17 - Amended Assembly pdf June 08, 2017
- Amended 04/17/17 - Amended Senate pdf April 17, 2017
- Introduced 01/31/17 - Introduced pdf January 31, 2017
- SB204 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 98, Statutes of 2017.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 10 a.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 1936.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 74. Noes 0. Page 2473.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (June 28).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (June 13). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
Referred to Com. on JUD.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 1223.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
-
Set for hearing May 22.
-
May 15 hearing postponed by committee.
-
Set for hearing May 15.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 851.) (April 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
Set for hearing April 25.
-
Referred to Com. on JUD.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 3.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Chiu · Cosponsor
- Dodd · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Dodd
Co-sponsors (1)
- Chiu
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Newman | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 55 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 14 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 74 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 93% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Acosta | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Not Voting |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Not Voting |
| Bocanegra | — | Not Voting |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Not Voting |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Yea |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 204 do?
- Existing law provides for the issuance and enforcement of protective orders in cases involving domestic violence. Existing law provides for a Uniform Interstate Enforcement of Domestic Violence Protection Orders Act, which authorizes the enforcement of a valid foreign protection order in a tribunal of this state under certain conditions. Existing law establishes a Domestic Violence Restraining Order System for purposes of registering protection orders, as specified, which is administered by the Department of Justice. This bill would enact the Uniform Recognition and Enforcement of Canadian Domestic Violence Protection Orders Act, which would authorize the enforcement of a valid Canadian domestic violence protection order in a tribunal of this state under certain conditions. The bill would prescribe the criteria for a determination of the validity of a protection order under these provisions, as specified, and would authorize the registration of such a protection order in the Domestic Violence Restraining Order System. The bill would require a law enforcement officer of this state to enforce a protection order under these provisions upon determining that there is probable cause to believe that a valid protection order exists and has been violated. By imposing new duties on law enforcement agencies, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
- Who sponsors SB 204?
- SB 204 is sponsored by Chiu and Dodd.
- What is the current status of SB 204?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 31, 2017. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 204?
- Track SB 204 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 204
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 204
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →