Public Employee Relations Board: Orange County Transportation Authority: San Joaquin Regional Transit Distr...
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 2886 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 2886.
You're tracking AB 2886
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 2886 — Public Employee Relations Board: Orange County Transportation Authority: San Joaquin Regional Transit District.
Last action — Vetoed by Governor.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law establishes the Public Employment Relations Board (PERB) in state government as a means of resolving disputes and enforcing the statutory duties and rights of specified public employers and employees under various acts regulating collective bargaining, including the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act. Existing law includes within PERB's jurisdiction the resolution of disputes alleging violation of rules and regulations adopted by a public agency, as defined, concerning unit determinations, representations, recognition, and elections, as specified. Existing law does not apply the above provisions to employees of specified transit agencies, including the Orange County Transportation Authority and the San Joaquin Regional Transit District, among others. Existing law establishes the Orange County Transportation Authority and the San Joaquin Regional Transit District within the Counties of Orange and San Joaquin. Existing law authorizes employees of these transit agencies to enter into labor organizations, as specified, and requires the California State Mediation and Conciliation Service to participate in labor organization disputes, as provided. Under existing law, these transit agencies may sue, and be sued, in all courts and tribunals of competent jurisdiction. This bill, on and after January 1, 2020, would require employers and employees of the Orange County Transportation Authority and the San Joaquin Regional Transit District to adjudicate complaints of specified labor violations before PERB as an unfair practice and would authorize specified parties aggrieved by PERB's decision or order to petition for relief from that decision or order, as provided. By requiring the transit agencies to adjudicate claims before PERB, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Orange County Transportation Authority and the San Joaquin Regional Transit District. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill Text
- Enrolled 08/23/18 - Enrolled Current pdf August 23, 2018
- Amended 04/10/18 - Amended Assembly pdf April 10, 2018
- Amended 03/23/18 - Amended Assembly pdf March 23, 2018
- Introduced 02/16/18 - Introduced pdf February 16, 2018
- AB2886 View text html
Action History
-
Vetoed by Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.
-
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 28. Noes 11. Page 5551.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 16).
-
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (June 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 3. Noes 2.) (June 11). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
Referred to Coms. on P.E. & R. and JUD.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 73. Noes 0. Page 5132.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 2).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (April 18). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Re-referred to Com. on P.E., R., & S.S.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on P.E., R., & S.S. Read second time and amended.
-
Re-referred to Com. on P.E., R., & S.S.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on P.E., R., & S.S. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on P.E., R., & S.S.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Daly · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 3 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Daly
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 24 | 10 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 28 | 11 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 70% | 28% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Nay |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Delgado | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Nay |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 40% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 52 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 73 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 0% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (78)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Acosta | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Not Voting |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Not Voting |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Kamlager-Dove | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Not Voting |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Not Voting |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Not Voting |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Yea |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Brough | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Not Voting |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2886 do?
- Existing law establishes the Public Employment Relations Board (PERB) in state government as a means of resolving disputes and enforcing the statutory duties and rights of specified public employers and employees under various acts regulating collective bargaining, including the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act. Existing law includes within PERB's jurisdiction the resolution of disputes alleging violation of rules and regulations adopted by a public agency, as defined, concerning unit determinations, representations, recognition, and elections, as specified. Existing law does not apply the above provisions to employees of specified transit agencies, including the Orange County Transportation Authority and the San Joaquin Regional Transit District, among others. Existing law establishes the Orange County Transportation Authority and the San Joaquin Regional Transit District within the Counties of Orange and San Joaquin. Existing law authorizes employees of these transit agencies to enter into labor organizations, as specified, and requires the California State Mediation and Conciliation Service to participate in labor organization disputes, as provided. Under existing law, these transit agencies may sue, and be sued, in all courts and tribunals of competent jurisdiction. This bill, on and after January 1, 2020, would require employers and employees of the Orange County Transportation Authority and the San Joaquin Regional Transit District to adjudicate complaints of specified labor violations before PERB as an unfair practice and would authorize specified parties aggrieved by PERB's decision or order to petition for relief from that decision or order, as provided. By requiring the transit agencies to adjudicate claims before PERB, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Orange County Transportation Authority and the San Joaquin Regional Transit District. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
- Who sponsors AB 2886?
- AB 2886 is sponsored by Daly.
- What is the current status of AB 2886?
- This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 2886?
- Track AB 2886 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2886
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2886
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →