California 2017-2018 Regular Session Status: Passed Assembly

AB 382 — County of Orange: joint exercise of powers agreements: toll roads.

Last action — In committee: Set, first hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

The Joint Exercise of Powers Act generally authorizes 2 or more public agencies, by agreement, to jointly exercise any common power. Existing law authorizes the County of Orange and the cities in that county, by ordinance, to require the payment of fees as a condition of approval of a final map or as a condition of issuing a building permit for purposes of defraying the actual or estimated cost of constructing bridges over waterways, railways, freeways, and canyons, or constructing major thoroughfares. Existing law authorizes those entities to form a joint powers agency for specified purposes, including incurring indebtedness for the construction of bridge facilities or major thoroughfares, pursuant to which various toll roads in the County of Orange were constructed. This bill would prohibit those entities, on and after January 1, 2018, from forming a new joint powers agency to construct bridge facilities or major thoroughfares under that specific authorization or the general authorization. The bill would prohibit a joint powers agency formed under that specific authorization from incurring new bonded indebtedness, except for specified purposes. Existing law authorizes a joint powers agency created for these purposes to make certain toll revenues and fees available to specified other joint powers agencies to pay for the cost of construction and toll collection of major thoroughfares other than those for which the toll or fee is charged if specified requirements are met and findings are made. This bill would delete this provision.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. In committee: Set, first hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.

  2. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  3. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on T. & H.

  4. Referred to Coms. on T. & H. and APPR.

  5. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  6. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 75. Noes 2. Page 1927.)

  7. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  8. Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.

  9. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (May 26).

  10. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  11. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (March 27). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  12. Coauthors revised.

  13. Referred to Com. on TRANS.

  14. From printer. May be heard in committee March 12.

  15. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Chávez · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 3 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Chávez

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 12 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 10001
Democratic 2000
Total 12001
% of votes cast 92%0%0%8%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Beall — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Allen — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Roth — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Wieckowski — Not Voting
Galgiani — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Failed 3 Yea · 7 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 3503
Democratic 0200
Total 3703
% of votes cast 23%54%0%23%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Beall — Nay
Roth — Not Voting
Vidak — Yea
Wieckowski — Not Voting
Galgiani — Nay
Dodd — Nay
Allen — Nay
Morrell — Yea
Skinner — Nay
Cannella — Not Voting
Beth Gaines — Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Nay
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 75 Yea · 2 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 53202
Democratic 16000
Republican 6001
Total 75203
% of votes cast 94%3%0%4%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Acosta — Yea
Baker — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Yea
Levine — Yea
Low — Yea
Mathis — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Ting — Nay
Voepel — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Gloria — Yea
Chau — Yea
Gonzalez Fletcher — Yea
Mayes — Yea
Salas — Yea
Medina — Yea
Chu — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Weber — Yea
Burke — Yea
Gray — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Harper — Yea
Holden — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Kiley — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Melendez — Not Voting
Bigelow — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Steinorth — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Wood — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Eggman — Not Voting
Cunningham — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Daly — Yea
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Travis Allen — Nay
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Yea
Choi, Steven S. Republican Not Voting
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Flora, Heath Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea
Patterson, Joe Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 16 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 10001
Democratic 5000
Republican 1000
Total 16001
% of votes cast 94%0%0%6%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Bigelow — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Yea
Obernolte — Not Voting
Gonzalez Fletcher — Yea
Gray — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 382 do?
The Joint Exercise of Powers Act generally authorizes 2 or more public agencies, by agreement, to jointly exercise any common power. Existing law authorizes the County of Orange and the cities in that county, by ordinance, to require the payment of fees as a condition of approval of a final map or as a condition of issuing a building permit for purposes of defraying the actual or estimated cost of constructing bridges over waterways, railways, freeways, and canyons, or constructing major thoroughfares. Existing law authorizes those entities to form a joint powers agency for specified purposes, including incurring indebtedness for the construction of bridge facilities or major thoroughfares, pursuant to which various toll roads in the County of Orange were constructed. This bill would prohibit those entities, on and after January 1, 2018, from forming a new joint powers agency to construct bridge facilities or major thoroughfares under that specific authorization or the general authorization. The bill would prohibit a joint powers agency formed under that specific authorization from incurring new bonded indebtedness, except for specified purposes. Existing law authorizes a joint powers agency created for these purposes to make certain toll revenues and fees available to specified other joint powers agencies to pay for the cost of construction and toll collection of major thoroughfares other than those for which the toll or fee is charged if specified requirements are met and findings are made. This bill would delete this provision.
Who sponsors AB 382?
AB 382 is sponsored by Chávez.
What is the current status of AB 382?
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 382?
Track AB 382 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 382

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 382

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →