California 2017-2018 Regular Session Status: Enacted

SB 848 — Transportation.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 46, Statutes of 2018.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 10, 2018. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 3 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) Existing law authorizes the Department of General Services to enter into agreements for the purchase and development of various state facilities. The exercise of certain of these authorizations is conditioned upon the approval of other state departments or upon entering into agreements with other governmental entities. This bill would authorize the Department of General Services, with the consent of the Department of the California Highway Patrol, to enter into a lease-purchase agreement, or lease with an option to purchase agreement, for a build-to-suit office facility to replace the California Highway Patrol area office in Tracy in San Joaquin County. The bill would require the facility to be designed and built to standards prescribed in the Essential Services Buildings Seismic Safety Act of 1986 and be subject to oversight and inspection in a manner consistent with state infrastructure projects. The bill would prescribe certain characteristics that the facility would be anticipated to contain. The bill would require a lease and related agreements authorized by its provisions to be subject to Department of Finance approval of its terms and conditions, as well as specified legislative notice requirements and approval pursuant to the Property Acquisition Law. (2) Existing law governing public contracting authorizes regional transportation agencies, as defined, to use the Construction Manager/General Contractor (CM/GC) project delivery method, as specified, to design and construct certain expressways and bridges if there is an evaluation of the traditional design-bid-build method of construction and of the CM/GC method and the board of the regional transportation agency adopts the method in a public meeting. Existing law defines the term "project" for these purposes to mean the construction of an expressway that is not on the state highway system, the construction of specified bridges that are not on the state highway system, and specified projects in the County of Riverside. Existing law defines the term "regional transportation agency" for these purposes to include specified entities and specified categories of entities. Existing law requires that specified information provided to a regional transportation agency under the CM/GC method be verified under oath. This bill would include in the definition of "project" the construction, alteration, repair, rehabilitation, or improvement of the Golden Gate Bridge. The bill would include the Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District in the definition of "regional transportation agency." By expanding the scope of the existing crime of perjury, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District. (3) Existing law requires that 14% of the local sales and use tax be transferred to the local transportation fund of each county for allocation, as directed by the transportation planning agency, for various transportation purposes. Existing law, after deductions for administration and various other transportation purposes, generally requires the remaining revenues in the local transportation fund to be used for transit purposes in urbanized areas of counties with a population of 500,000 or more, but allows these revenues to also be used for streets and roads, or for other specified purposes in smaller counties, in nonurbanized areas of the larger counties, and in cities with a population of 100,000 or less within an urbanized area of a larger county, as specified, if the transportation planning agency finds that there are no unmet transit needs or no unmet transit needs that are reasonable to meet. Existing law, notwithstanding these provisions, requires the remaining local transportation fund revenues in the County of Ventura to be used for transit purposes. Existing law provides that a transportation planning agency, prior to making any allocation of revenues from the local transportation fund that are not directly related to transit or certain other purposes, is required to consult with the social services transportation advisory council, and to identify the unmet transit needs of the jurisdiction and those needs that are reasonable to meet, following a public hearing. This bill, notwithstanding these provisions, would provide that the Ventura County Transportation Commission may allocate local transportation fund revenues apportioned to the City of Thousand Oaks for local streets and roads and other specified purposes. (4) Existing law provides that the Department of Transportation shall have full possession and control of the state highway system and associated property. Existing law provides for cooperative agreements between the department and public entities for the performance of work by the department and those entities and apportionment of associated expenses. This bill, until July 1, 2021, would prohibit the department from charging any self-help counties with countywide sales tax measures dedicated to transportation improvements more than 10% for administration indirect cost recovery, as outlined in the department's Indirect Cost Recovery Proposal, and would require the department to charge those self-help counties for functional overhead. The bill would require the department to report, on or before July 1, 2021, to the Legislature on the type and amount of engineering work performed annually for self-help counties pursuant to these provisions for the 2018–19, 2019–20, and 2020–21 fiscal years. (5) Existing law creates the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Program and, after certain allocations for the program are made, requires the remaining funds available for the program to be allocated 50% for maintenance of the state highway system or for purposes of the state highway operation and protection program and 50% for apportionment to cities and counties by the Controller pursuant to a specified formula. Prior to receiving an apportionment of funds under the program from the Controller in a fiscal year, existing law requires a city or county to submit to the California Transportation Commission a list of projects proposed to be funded with these funds. Existing law authorizes an eligible city or county to expend other funds on eligible projects and to reimburse the source of those other funds when it receives its apportionment from the Controller. This bill would specify that reimbursement of those other funds when the eligible city or county receives its apportionments from the Controller may occur over one or more years. (6) Existing law authorizes the Department of Motor Vehicles to establish contracts for electronic programs that allow qualified private industry partners to join the department in providing services that include processing and payment programs for vehicle registration and titling transactions, and services related to reporting vehicle sales and producing temporary license plates. Existing law requires the department to charge a $3 transaction fee for the provision of the information and services, and to deposit the fees collected into the Motor Vehicle Account. Existing law authorizes the private industry partner to pass on the transaction fee to the customer, as specified. This bill would require the department to impose an additional $1 transaction fee for implementation of the private industry partners' proportionate share of departmentwide system improvements, and would prohibit a private industry partner from passing on the additional fee to the customer. The bill would discontinue imposition of the additional transaction fee when the Director of Motor Vehicles determines that sufficient funds for the system improvements have been received, or on December 31, 2023, whichever occurs first. If sufficient funds are received first, the bill would require the director to execute and retain a declaration making that determination, and post the declaration on the department's Internet Web site. (7) Existing law authorizes the Department of Transportation to designate certain lanes for the exclusive use of high-occupancy vehicles (HOVs) . Existing federal law authorizes, until September 30, 2019, a state to allow low emission and energy-efficient vehicles to use lanes designated for HOVs without regard to vehicle occupancy. Existing federal law also authorizes, until September 30, 2025, a state to allow alternative fuel vehicles and new qualified plug-in electric drive motor vehicles to use those HOV lanes without regard to vehicle occupancy. Existing law also authorizes super ultra-low emission vehicles (SULEV) , advanced technology partial zero-emission vehicles (AT PZEV) , or transitional zero-emission vehicles (TZEV) , that display a valid identifier issued by the Department of Motor Vehicles to use these HOV lanes without regard to vehicle occupancy until January 1, 2019, or until the date federal authorization expires, or until the Secretary of State receives a specified notice, whichever occurs first. Existing law makes the use by a single occupant vehicle of an HOV lane without those identifiers a crime. Existing law makes SULEV, AT PZEV, and TZEV identifiers issued between January 1, 2017, and January 1, 2019, valid until January 1, 2019, those issued on or after January 1, 2019, valid until January 1, 2022, and those issued on or after January 1, 2019, valid until January 1 of the 4th year after the year in which they were issued. Existing law generally prohibits issuing an identifier for a vehicle more than once. This bill would make SULEV, AT PZEV, and TZEV identifiers issued between January 1, 2017, and March 1, 2018, valid until January 1, 2019, would make those issued between March 1, 2018, and January 1, 2019, valid until January 1, 2022, and would make those issued on or after March 1, 2018, for a vehicle that had previously been issued an identifier, valid until January 1, 2022. The bill would make additional conforming changes. (8) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. (9) This bill would appropriate $8,000,000 from the General Fund to the State Transportation Agency for allocation to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Agency for the River to Rails Project, as specified, subject to certain conditions. (10) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 46, Statutes of 2018.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:30 p.m.

  4. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 25. Noes 11. Page 4684.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  5. Unanimous consent granted to take up without reference to file.

  6. In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  7. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 55. Noes 25. Page 5806.) Ordered to the Senate.

  8. Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Ayes 55. Noes 23. Page 5803.)

  9. Ordered to third reading.

  10. Withdrawn from committee.

  11. Assembly Rule 96 suspended. (Ayes 55. Noes 24. Page 5802.)

  12. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET.

  13. Referred to Com. on BUDGET.

  14. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  15. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 24. Noes 11. Page 4921.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  16. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  17. Ordered to second reading.

  18. Withdrawn from committee. (Ayes 25. Noes 11. Page 4865.)

  19. Referred to Com. on B. & F.R.

  20. From printer. May be acted upon on or after February 10.

  21. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 11 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 25 Yea · 11 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 211003
Democratic 4100
Total 251103
% of votes cast 64%28%0%8%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Nay
Beall — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hill — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Lara — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Newman — Not Voting
Skinner — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Wilk — Nay
Fuller — Nay
Galgiani — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Monning — Yea
Pan — Yea
Roth — Yea
Allen — Yea
De León — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Cannella — Not Voting
Dodd — Yea
Bates — Nay
Moorlach — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Vidak — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Mark Stone — Nay
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Nay
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 55 Yea · 25 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 391900
Democratic 16000
Republican 0600
Total 552500
% of votes cast 69%31%0%0%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Acosta — Nay
Baker — Nay
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Nay
Mathis — Nay
Melendez — Nay
Mullin — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Voepel — Nay
Weber — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Cunningham — Nay
Friedman — Yea
Gloria — Yea
Holden — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Chu — Yea
Low — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Rivas — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Harper — Nay
Salas — Yea
Gray — Yea
Burke — Yea
Gonzalez Fletcher — Yea
Kamlager-Dove — Yea
Kiley — Nay
Levine — Yea
Maienschein — Nay
Fong — Nay
Chau — Yea
Mayes — Nay
McCarty — Yea
Medina — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Chávez — Nay
Cooley — Yea
Bigelow — Nay
Cooper — Yea
Daly — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Obernolte — Nay
Quirk — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Steinorth — Nay
Ting — Yea
Waldron — Nay
Wood — Yea
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Nay
Mark Stone — Yea
Travis Allen — Nay
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Nay
Choi, Steven S. Republican Nay
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Flora, Heath Republican Nay
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Lackey, Tom Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 24 Yea · 11 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 201004
Democratic 4100
Total 241104
% of votes cast 62%28%0%10%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Nay
Beall — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hill — Yea
Hueso — Not Voting
Lara — Yea
Monning — Yea
Moorlach — Nay
Roth — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Galgiani — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Pan — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Newman — Yea
Bates — Nay
Dodd — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Vidak — Nay
Wilk — Nay
Allen — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
De León — Not Voting
Cannella — Not Voting
Morrell — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Mark Stone — Nay
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Nay
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 848 do?
(1) Existing law authorizes the Department of General Services to enter into agreements for the purchase and development of various state facilities. The exercise of certain of these authorizations is conditioned upon the approval of other state departments or upon entering into agreements with other governmental entities. This bill would authorize the Department of General Services, with the consent of the Department of the California Highway Patrol, to enter into a lease-purchase agreement, or lease with an option to purchase agreement, for a build-to-suit office facility to replace the California Highway Patrol area office in Tracy in San Joaquin County. The bill would require the facility to be designed and built to standards prescribed in the Essential Services Buildings Seismic Safety Act of 1986 and be subject to oversight and inspection in a manner consistent with state infrastructure projects. The bill would prescribe certain characteristics that the facility would be anticipated to contain. The bill would require a lease and related agreements authorized by its provisions to be subject to Department of Finance approval of its terms and conditions, as well as specified legislative notice requirements and approval pursuant to the Property Acquisition Law. (2) Existing law governing public contracting authorizes regional transportation agencies, as defined, to use the Construction Manager/General Contractor (CM/GC) project delivery method, as specified, to design and construct certain expressways and bridges if there is an evaluation of the traditional design-bid-build method of construction and of the CM/GC method and the board of the regional transportation agency adopts the method in a public meeting. Existing law defines the term "project" for these purposes to mean the construction of an expressway that is not on the state highway system, the construction of specified bridges that are not on the state highway system, and specified projects in the County of Riverside. Existing law defines the term "regional transportation agency" for these purposes to include specified entities and specified categories of entities. Existing law requires that specified information provided to a regional transportation agency under the CM/GC method be verified under oath. This bill would include in the definition of "project" the construction, alteration, repair, rehabilitation, or improvement of the Golden Gate Bridge. The bill would include the Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District in the definition of "regional transportation agency." By expanding the scope of the existing crime of perjury, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District. (3) Existing law requires that 14% of the local sales and use tax be transferred to the local transportation fund of each county for allocation, as directed by the transportation planning agency, for various transportation purposes. Existing law, after deductions for administration and various other transportation purposes, generally requires the remaining revenues in the local transportation fund to be used for transit purposes in urbanized areas of counties with a population of 500,000 or more, but allows these revenues to also be used for streets and roads, or for other specified purposes in smaller counties, in nonurbanized areas of the larger counties, and in cities with a population of 100,000 or less within an urbanized area of a larger county, as specified, if the transportation planning agency finds that there are no unmet transit needs or no unmet transit needs that are reasonable to meet. Existing law, notwithstanding these provisions, requires the remaining local transportation fund revenues in the County of Ventura to be used for transit purposes. Existing law provides that a transportation planning agency, prior to making any allocation of revenues from the local transportation fund that are not directly related to transit or certain other purposes, is required to consult with the social services transportation advisory council, and to identify the unmet transit needs of the jurisdiction and those needs that are reasonable to meet, following a public hearing. This bill, notwithstanding these provisions, would provide that the Ventura County Transportation Commission may allocate local transportation fund revenues apportioned to the City of Thousand Oaks for local streets and roads and other specified purposes. (4) Existing law provides that the Department of Transportation shall have full possession and control of the state highway system and associated property. Existing law provides for cooperative agreements between the department and public entities for the performance of work by the department and those entities and apportionment of associated expenses. This bill, until July 1, 2021, would prohibit the department from charging any self-help counties with countywide sales tax measures dedicated to transportation improvements more than 10% for administration indirect cost recovery, as outlined in the department's Indirect Cost Recovery Proposal, and would require the department to charge those self-help counties for functional overhead. The bill would require the department to report, on or before July 1, 2021, to the Legislature on the type and amount of engineering work performed annually for self-help counties pursuant to these provisions for the 2018–19, 2019–20, and 2020–21 fiscal years. (5) Existing law creates the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Program and, after certain allocations for the program are made, requires the remaining funds available for the program to be allocated 50% for maintenance of the state highway system or for purposes of the state highway operation and protection program and 50% for apportionment to cities and counties by the Controller pursuant to a specified formula. Prior to receiving an apportionment of funds under the program from the Controller in a fiscal year, existing law requires a city or county to submit to the California Transportation Commission a list of projects proposed to be funded with these funds. Existing law authorizes an eligible city or county to expend other funds on eligible projects and to reimburse the source of those other funds when it receives its apportionment from the Controller. This bill would specify that reimbursement of those other funds when the eligible city or county receives its apportionments from the Controller may occur over one or more years. (6) Existing law authorizes the Department of Motor Vehicles to establish contracts for electronic programs that allow qualified private industry partners to join the department in providing services that include processing and payment programs for vehicle registration and titling transactions, and services related to reporting vehicle sales and producing temporary license plates. Existing law requires the department to charge a $3 transaction fee for the provision of the information and services, and to deposit the fees collected into the Motor Vehicle Account. Existing law authorizes the private industry partner to pass on the transaction fee to the customer, as specified. This bill would require the department to impose an additional $1 transaction fee for implementation of the private industry partners' proportionate share of departmentwide system improvements, and would prohibit a private industry partner from passing on the additional fee to the customer. The bill would discontinue imposition of the additional transaction fee when the Director of Motor Vehicles determines that sufficient funds for the system improvements have been received, or on December 31, 2023, whichever occurs first. If sufficient funds are received first, the bill would require the director to execute and retain a declaration making that determination, and post the declaration on the department's Internet Web site. (7) Existing law authorizes the Department of Transportation to designate certain lanes for the exclusive use of high-occupancy vehicles (HOVs) . Existing federal law authorizes, until September 30, 2019, a state to allow low emission and energy-efficient vehicles to use lanes designated for HOVs without regard to vehicle occupancy. Existing federal law also authorizes, until September 30, 2025, a state to allow alternative fuel vehicles and new qualified plug-in electric drive motor vehicles to use those HOV lanes without regard to vehicle occupancy. Existing law also authorizes super ultra-low emission vehicles (SULEV) , advanced technology partial zero-emission vehicles (AT PZEV) , or transitional zero-emission vehicles (TZEV) , that display a valid identifier issued by the Department of Motor Vehicles to use these HOV lanes without regard to vehicle occupancy until January 1, 2019, or until the date federal authorization expires, or until the Secretary of State receives a specified notice, whichever occurs first. Existing law makes the use by a single occupant vehicle of an HOV lane without those identifiers a crime. Existing law makes SULEV, AT PZEV, and TZEV identifiers issued between January 1, 2017, and January 1, 2019, valid until January 1, 2019, those issued on or after January 1, 2019, valid until January 1, 2022, and those issued on or after January 1, 2019, valid until January 1 of the 4th year after the year in which they were issued. Existing law generally prohibits issuing an identifier for a vehicle more than once. This bill would make SULEV, AT PZEV, and TZEV identifiers issued between January 1, 2017, and March 1, 2018, valid until January 1, 2019, would make those issued between March 1, 2018, and January 1, 2019, valid until January 1, 2022, and would make those issued on or after March 1, 2018, for a vehicle that had previously been issued an identifier, valid until January 1, 2022. The bill would make additional conforming changes. (8) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. (9) This bill would appropriate $8,000,000 from the General Fund to the State Transportation Agency for allocation to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Agency for the River to Rails Project, as specified, subject to certain conditions. (10) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
Who sponsors SB 848?
SB 848 is sponsored by Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review.
What is the current status of SB 848?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 10, 2018. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 848?
Track SB 848 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 848

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 848

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →