California 2017-2018 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 475 — Department of Technology.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 193, Statutes of 2017.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 13, 2017. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 7 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law establishes within the Government Operations Agency the Department of Technology, which is supervised by the Director of Technology. Existing law authorizes the Director of Technology and the Department of Technology to exercise various powers in creating and managing the information technology policy of the state, including, among others, reviewing and maintaining the information technology sections of the State Administrative Manual, except for those provisions relating to information technology procurement procedures and information technology fiscal policy. This bill would require the director to also be responsible for periodically reviewing and maintaining procurement procedures related to information technology projects. The bill would also make technical changes in the provision relating to the duties of the director. Existing law requires the director to produce an annual information technology performance report, and to submit that report to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee by January 15 of every year. This bill would recast the requirements of that report by consolidating therein reports of cost savings and other avoidances that are currently included in another annual report, and would require the director to include any changes in the report when submitting it to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee. Existing law requires the department to submit an information technology performance management framework to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee by May 15, 2009, and to notify the Legislature if the agency modifies that framework. This bill instead would require the department to maintain an information technology performance management framework that includes specified information relating to the state's information technology program. The bill would remove the requirement that the department submit the framework to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee and notify the committee of any changes to the framework. Existing law requires the director to review a specified manual and draft a report, based on that manual and other specified factors, to be transmitted to certain legislative committees on or before July 1, 2016, that recommends how a team of senior consulting information technology experts could be developed to serve as support for state agencies and senior project team members in state government. Existing law also requires the director, after transmitting the report, to establish a unit, within the department, of consulting information technology experts to serve as support for state agencies. This bill would repeal that reporting requirement as well as the requirement to establish a unit of consulting information technology experts. Existing law requires each state agency and certain designated state entities, on or before February 1 of every year, to report to the department a summary of its actual and projected information technology and telecommunications costs, as specified. Existing law also requires each of these state agencies and entities, on or before January 1, 2018, and annually thereafter, to report to the department a summary of its actual and projected information security costs, as specified. This bill would instead require that both of these summaries be submitted to the department on or before February 1 of every year. Existing law authorizes the Department of Technology, until January 1, 2018, and where any of certain conditions exist to utilize a specified negotiation process for the purpose of procuring information technology and telecommunications goods and services on behalf of state departments and information technology projects. This bill would remove the January 1, 2018, date restriction described above and thereby would continue indefinitely the authority of the Department of Technology to utilize that specified negotiation process.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 193, Statutes of 2017.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 2674.).

  5. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after July 15 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  6. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 2022.).

  7. Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.

  8. From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.

  9. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (June 27). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  10. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on G.O.

  11. Referred to Com. on G.O.

  12. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  13. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 69. Noes 0. Page 1616.)

  14. Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.

  15. From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 10).

  16. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  17. From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on P. & C.P. Re-referred. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (April 24). Re-referred to Com. on P. & C.P.

  18. (pending re-refer to Com. on P. & C.P.)

  19. Assembly Rule 56 suspended. (Page 1117.)

  20. Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.

  21. Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.

  22. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on TRANS. Read second time and amended.

  23. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  24. Referred to Com. on TRANS.

  25. From printer. May be heard in committee March 16.

  26. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Chau · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Chau

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

AB 475 CHAU Concurrence in Senate Amendments

Passed 78 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 58000
Democratic 14001
Republican 6000
Total 78001
% of votes cast 99%0%0%1%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Acosta — Yea
Baker — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Yea
Harper — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Low — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Mathis — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Ting — Yea
Weber — Yea
Chau — Yea
Mayes — Yea
Gonzalez Fletcher — Yea
Medina — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Burke — Yea
Fong — Yea
Salas — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Gray — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Holden — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Kiley — Yea
Levine — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Chu — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Mullin — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Steinorth — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Voepel — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Wood — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Cunningham — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Daly — Yea
Gloria — Yea
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Travis Allen — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Not Voting
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Yea
Choi, Steven S. Republican Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Flora, Heath Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Consent Calendar 2nd AB475

Passed 39 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 34001
Democratic 5000
Total 39001
% of votes cast 98%0%0%3%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Hernandez — Yea
Hill — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Moorlach — Yea
Nielsen — Not Voting
Roth — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Allen — Yea
De León — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Lara — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Newman — Yea
Pan — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Bates — Yea
Beall — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar

Passed 13 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 13000
Total 13000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Bradford — Yea
Lara — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Hill — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea

Official roll call →

AB 475 CHAU Consent Calendar Second Day

Passed 69 Yea · 0 Nay · 11 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 49008
Democratic 13003
Republican 7000
Total 690011
% of votes cast 86%0%0%14%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Acosta — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Yea
Harper — Yea
Levine — Yea
Mathis — Yea
Mullin — Not Voting
Obernolte — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Voepel — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Burke — Yea
Chu — Yea
Cunningham — Yea
Gonzalez Fletcher — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Kiley — Yea
Salas — Yea
Low — Yea
Mayes — Yea
Medina — Yea
Gray — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Ting — Yea
Weber — Yea
Wood — Yea
Frazier — Not Voting
Gloria — Not Voting
Gomez — Yea
Holden — Not Voting
Maienschein — Yea
McCarty — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Baker — Yea
Chau — Not Voting
Chiu — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Rendon — Not Voting
Santiago — Not Voting
Steinorth — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Daly — Yea
Friedman — Not Voting
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Travis Allen — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Not Voting
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Not Voting
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Yea
Choi, Steven S. Republican Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Flora, Heath Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea
Patterson, Joe Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass. To Consent Calendar.

Passed 17 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 11000
Democratic 5000
Republican 1000
Total 17000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Bigelow — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Yea
Chau — Yea
Gonzalez Fletcher — Yea
Gray — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Be re-referred to the Committee on [Privacy and Consumer Protection]

Passed 11 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 8000
Democratic 2000
Republican 1000
Total 11000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Brough — Yea
Salas — Yea
Levine — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Cunningham — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

technology
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 475 do?
Existing law establishes within the Government Operations Agency the Department of Technology, which is supervised by the Director of Technology. Existing law authorizes the Director of Technology and the Department of Technology to exercise various powers in creating and managing the information technology policy of the state, including, among others, reviewing and maintaining the information technology sections of the State Administrative Manual, except for those provisions relating to information technology procurement procedures and information technology fiscal policy. This bill would require the director to also be responsible for periodically reviewing and maintaining procurement procedures related to information technology projects. The bill would also make technical changes in the provision relating to the duties of the director. Existing law requires the director to produce an annual information technology performance report, and to submit that report to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee by January 15 of every year. This bill would recast the requirements of that report by consolidating therein reports of cost savings and other avoidances that are currently included in another annual report, and would require the director to include any changes in the report when submitting it to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee. Existing law requires the department to submit an information technology performance management framework to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee by May 15, 2009, and to notify the Legislature if the agency modifies that framework. This bill instead would require the department to maintain an information technology performance management framework that includes specified information relating to the state's information technology program. The bill would remove the requirement that the department submit the framework to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee and notify the committee of any changes to the framework. Existing law requires the director to review a specified manual and draft a report, based on that manual and other specified factors, to be transmitted to certain legislative committees on or before July 1, 2016, that recommends how a team of senior consulting information technology experts could be developed to serve as support for state agencies and senior project team members in state government. Existing law also requires the director, after transmitting the report, to establish a unit, within the department, of consulting information technology experts to serve as support for state agencies. This bill would repeal that reporting requirement as well as the requirement to establish a unit of consulting information technology experts. Existing law requires each state agency and certain designated state entities, on or before February 1 of every year, to report to the department a summary of its actual and projected information technology and telecommunications costs, as specified. Existing law also requires each of these state agencies and entities, on or before January 1, 2018, and annually thereafter, to report to the department a summary of its actual and projected information security costs, as specified. This bill would instead require that both of these summaries be submitted to the department on or before February 1 of every year. Existing law authorizes the Department of Technology, until January 1, 2018, and where any of certain conditions exist to utilize a specified negotiation process for the purpose of procuring information technology and telecommunications goods and services on behalf of state departments and information technology projects. This bill would remove the January 1, 2018, date restriction described above and thereby would continue indefinitely the authority of the Department of Technology to utilize that specified negotiation process.
Who sponsors AB 475?
AB 475 is sponsored by Chau.
What is the current status of AB 475?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 13, 2017. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 475?
Track AB 475 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 475

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 475

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →