Courts: judgeships.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 38 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 38.
You're tracking SB 38
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 38 — Courts: judgeships.
Last action — August 16 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law specifies the number of judges for the superior court of each county and for each division of each district of the court of appeal. Existing law provides that the Court of Appeal for the 4th Appellate District consists of 3 divisions. Existing law requires that one of these divisions hold its regular sessions in the San Bernardino/Riverside area and further requires this division to have 7 judges. This bill would increase the number of judges in the division of the Court of Appeal for the 4th Appellate District located in the San Bernardino/Riverside area to 8 judges.
Bill Text
- Amended 01/23/18 - Amended Senate Current pdf January 23, 2018
- Introduced 12/05/16 - Introduced pdf December 05, 2016
- SB38 View text html
Action History
-
August 16 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
-
June 27 set for first hearing. Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 12). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on JUD.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 4113.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 4055.) (January 18).
-
Set for hearing January 18.
-
January 16 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
Set for hearing January 16.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 4020.) (January 9). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing January 9.
-
March 28 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Set for hearing March 28.
-
Referred to Com. on JUD.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after January 5.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Sabrina Cervantes · Cosponsor
- Roth · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Roth
Co-sponsors (1)
- Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 0% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Holden | — | Not Voting |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 34 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 39 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Not Voting |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Newman | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 38 do?
- Existing law specifies the number of judges for the superior court of each county and for each division of each district of the court of appeal. Existing law provides that the Court of Appeal for the 4th Appellate District consists of 3 divisions. Existing law requires that one of these divisions hold its regular sessions in the San Bernardino/Riverside area and further requires this division to have 7 judges. This bill would increase the number of judges in the division of the Court of Appeal for the 4th Appellate District located in the San Bernardino/Riverside area to 8 judges.
- Who sponsors SB 38?
- SB 38 is sponsored by Cervantes, Sabrina (Democratic) and Roth.
- What is the current status of SB 38?
- This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 38?
- Track SB 38 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 38
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 38
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →