State Water Project: water supply contracts.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 2649 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 2649.
You're tracking AB 2649
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 2649 — State Water Project: water supply contracts.
Last action — From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Under existing law, the Department of Water Resources operates the State Water Resources Development System, known as the State Water Project, in accordance with the California Water Resources Development Bond Act to supply water to persons and entities in the state. Existing law requires the department to present to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee and relevant policy and fiscal committees of both houses of the Legislature the details of the terms and conditions of a long-term water supply contract between the department and a state water project contractor and to submit a copy of one long-term contract, as prescribed. This bill would instead require the department to provide at least 10 days' notice to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee and relevant policy and fiscal committees of the Legislature before holding public sessions to negotiate any potential amendment of a long-term water supply contract that is of projectwide significance with substantially similar terms intended to be offered to all contractors, or that would permanently transfer a contractual water amount between contractors. The bill would require the department, before the execution of a specified proposed amendment to a long-term water supply contract and not later than 60 days before final approval of such a proposed amendment, to submit to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee and relevant policy and fiscal committees of the Legislature certain information regarding the terms and conditions of a proposed amendment of a long-term water supply contract and to submit a copy of the long-term contract as it is proposed to be amended.
Bill Text
- Amended 08/28/18 - Amended Senate Current pdf August 28, 2018
- Amended 06/28/18 - Amended Senate pdf June 28, 2018
- Amended 06/18/18 - Amended Senate pdf June 18, 2018
- Amended 05/25/18 - Amended Assembly pdf May 25, 2018
- Amended 04/25/18 - Amended Assembly pdf April 25, 2018
- Amended 04/04/18 - Amended Assembly pdf April 04, 2018
- Amended 03/22/18 - Amended Assembly pdf March 22, 2018
- Introduced 02/15/18 - Introduced pdf February 15, 2018
- AB2649 View text html
Action History
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Senate Rule 29.3(b) suspended. (Ayes 28. Noes 11. Page 5853.)
-
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 16).
-
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 26).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on EQ.
-
Referred to Coms. on EQ. and N.R. & W.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 51. Noes 18. Page 5639.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 2.) (May 25).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 1.) (April 24).
-
Re-referred to Com. on W.,P., & W.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on W.,P., & W. Read second time and amended.
-
Re-referred to Com. on W.,P., & W.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on W.,P., & W. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on W.,P., & W.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 18.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Bloom · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 6 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Bloom
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 78% | 0% | 0% | 22% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Not Voting |
| Mark Stone | — | Not Voting |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 38 | 15 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 11 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 51 | 18 | 0 | 9 |
| % of votes cast | 65% | 23% | 0% | 12% |
How each member voted (78)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Acosta | — | Nay |
| Kamlager-Dove | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Not Voting |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Nay |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Nay |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Voepel | — | Nay |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Not Voting |
| Frazier | — | Not Voting |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Chiu | — | Not Voting |
| Ting | — | Nay |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Nay |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Nay |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Nay |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Not Voting |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 65% | 12% | 0% | 24% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Not Voting |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Not Voting |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Not Voting |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 11 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 7% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Not Voting |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2649 do?
- Under existing law, the Department of Water Resources operates the State Water Resources Development System, known as the State Water Project, in accordance with the California Water Resources Development Bond Act to supply water to persons and entities in the state. Existing law requires the department to present to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee and relevant policy and fiscal committees of both houses of the Legislature the details of the terms and conditions of a long-term water supply contract between the department and a state water project contractor and to submit a copy of one long-term contract, as prescribed. This bill would instead require the department to provide at least 10 days' notice to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee and relevant policy and fiscal committees of the Legislature before holding public sessions to negotiate any potential amendment of a long-term water supply contract that is of projectwide significance with substantially similar terms intended to be offered to all contractors, or that would permanently transfer a contractual water amount between contractors. The bill would require the department, before the execution of a specified proposed amendment to a long-term water supply contract and not later than 60 days before final approval of such a proposed amendment, to submit to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee and relevant policy and fiscal committees of the Legislature certain information regarding the terms and conditions of a proposed amendment of a long-term water supply contract and to submit a copy of the long-term contract as it is proposed to be amended.
- Who sponsors AB 2649?
- AB 2649 is sponsored by Bloom.
- What is the current status of AB 2649?
- This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 2649?
- Track AB 2649 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2649
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2649
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →