California 2017-2018 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate

SB 561 — Fallen Leaf Lake Community Services District: State audit.

Last action — Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law requires the California State Auditor to conduct financial and performance audits as directed by statute, and to conduct audits of a state or local governmental agencies or other publicly created entities as requested by the Joint Legislative Audit Committee. Existing law requires the county auditor to either perform an audit, or contract with a certified public accountant or public accountant to perform an audit, of the accounts and records of every special district within the county, as specified. Existing law authorizes a special district, by unanimous request of its governing board and unanimous approval by the board of supervisors, to replace the annual audit with an audit over a longer period of time or with a financial review, as specified. This bill would require, by August 1, 2019, the California State Auditor to complete an audit of the Fallen Leaf Lake Community Services District that includes, among other things, an analysis of the district's financial condition and ongoing financial viability. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Fallen Leaf Lake Community Services District.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.

  2. June 27 hearing postponed by committee.

  3. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E. & R.

  4. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E. & R.

  5. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on E. & R. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (June 20).

  6. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  7. Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and E. & R.

  8. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  9. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 4125.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  10. Ordered to third reading.

  11. From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.

  12. Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Joint Rule 10.5.

  13. Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.

  14. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 4. Noes 0. Page 4043.) (January 16).

  15. Set for hearing January 16.

  16. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on E. & C.A. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 4020.) (January 10). Re-referred to Com. on E. & C.A.

  17. Set for hearing January 10.

  18. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.

  19. April 26 hearing: Heard for testimony only.

  20. Set for hearing April 26.

  21. April 5 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.

  22. Set for hearing April 5.

  23. Referred to Coms. on GOV. & F. and E. & C.A.

  24. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 23.

  25. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (1)

  • Hill

Not signed on (120)

120 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 120 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Elections and Redistricting]

Passed 8 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 4000
Unaffiliated 4000
Republican 0001
Total 8001
% of votes cast 89%0%0%11%
How each member voted (9)
Member Party Vote
Bloom — Yea
Voepel — Yea
Rivas — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

3rd Reading SB561 Gaines et al.

Passed 36 Yea · 0 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 33002
Democratic 3002
Total 36004
% of votes cast 90%0%0%10%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Yea
Beall — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Monning — Yea
Newman — Yea
Pan — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Portantino — Yea
De León — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Hill — Yea
Allen — Not Voting
Hueso — Yea
Bates — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Lara — Yea
Mendoza — Not Voting
Moorlach — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Roth — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Not Voting
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Not Voting
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

finance
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 561 do?
Existing law requires the California State Auditor to conduct financial and performance audits as directed by statute, and to conduct audits of a state or local governmental agencies or other publicly created entities as requested by the Joint Legislative Audit Committee. Existing law requires the county auditor to either perform an audit, or contract with a certified public accountant or public accountant to perform an audit, of the accounts and records of every special district within the county, as specified. Existing law authorizes a special district, by unanimous request of its governing board and unanimous approval by the board of supervisors, to replace the annual audit with an audit over a longer period of time or with a financial review, as specified. This bill would require, by August 1, 2019, the California State Auditor to complete an audit of the Fallen Leaf Lake Community Services District that includes, among other things, an analysis of the district's financial condition and ongoing financial viability. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Fallen Leaf Lake Community Services District.
Who sponsors SB 561?
SB 561 is sponsored by Hill and Beth Gaines.
What is the current status of SB 561?
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 561?
Track SB 561 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 561

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 561

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →