Employers: gender pay differentials.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1209 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1209.
You're tracking AB 1209
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1209 — Employers: gender pay differentials.
Last action — Stricken from file.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law requires a corporation, limited liability company, or common interest development, among others, to file a statement of information with the Secretary of State, providing specified information about the entity. Existing law regulates the terms and conditions of employment, including the payment of wages. Existing law generally prohibits an employer from paying any of its employees at rates less than the rates paid to employees of the opposite sex for substantially similar work, as specified. This bill would require, on and after July 1, 2019, and biennially thereafter, that an employer that is required to file a statement of information with the Secretary of State and that has 500 or more employees in California to collect specified information on gender wage differentials. The bill would require the employer to submit the information to the Secretary of State as specified, by July 1, 2020, and biennially thereafter. The bill would require the Secretary of State to publish the information described above on an Internet Web site available to the public upon receiving necessary funding and establishing adequate mechanisms and procedures.
Bill Text
- Enrolled 09/13/17 - Enrolled Current pdf September 13, 2017
- Amended 09/01/17 - Amended Senate pdf September 01, 2017
- Amended 07/13/17 - Amended Senate pdf July 13, 2017
- Amended 07/05/17 - Amended Senate pdf July 05, 2017
- Amended 05/30/17 - Amended Assembly pdf May 30, 2017
- Amended 03/28/17 - Amended Assembly pdf March 28, 2017
- Introduced 02/17/17 - Introduced pdf February 17, 2017
- AB1209 View text html
Action History
-
Stricken from file.
-
Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
-
Vetoed by Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 47. Noes 23. Page 3142.).
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 9 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 23. Noes 13. Page 2574.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (September 1).
-
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (July 12).
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
-
Referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 48. Noes 19. Page 1967.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Ayes 52. Noes 24. Page 1776.)
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 6.) (May 26).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (April 19). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. & E. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on L. & E.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Gonzalez Fletcher · Primary
- Eggman · Cosponsor
- Gomez · Cosponsor
- Jones-Sawyer · Cosponsor
- Ash Kalra · Cosponsor
- Leyva · Cosponsor
- McCarty · Cosponsor
- Santiago · Cosponsor
- Skinner · Cosponsor
- Thurmond · Cosponsor
- Weber · Cosponsor
- Mia Bonta · Cosponsor
- Robert Garcia · Cosponsor
- Mark Stone · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 13 co-sponsors · 108 not signed on · 10 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Gonzalez Fletcher
Co-sponsors (13)
- Eggman
- Gomez
- Jones-Sawyer
- Kalra, Ash Democratic
- Leyva
- McCarty
- Santiago
- Skinner
- Thurmond
- Weber
- Bonta, Mia Democratic
- Garcia, Robert Democratic
- Mark Stone
Not signed on (108)
108 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 108 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 36 | 16 | 0 | 6 |
| Democratic | 11 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 47 | 23 | 0 | 9 |
| % of votes cast | 59% | 29% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Acosta | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Nay |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Nay |
| Fong | — | Nay |
| Kiley | — | Nay |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Not Voting |
| Mayes | — | Nay |
| Rubio | — | Not Voting |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Not Voting |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Cooper | — | Not Voting |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Not Voting |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Not Voting |
| Cunningham | — | Nay |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Nay |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Nay |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Nay |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 65% | 35% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Nay |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Nay |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1209 do?
- Existing law requires a corporation, limited liability company, or common interest development, among others, to file a statement of information with the Secretary of State, providing specified information about the entity. Existing law regulates the terms and conditions of employment, including the payment of wages. Existing law generally prohibits an employer from paying any of its employees at rates less than the rates paid to employees of the opposite sex for substantially similar work, as specified. This bill would require, on and after July 1, 2019, and biennially thereafter, that an employer that is required to file a statement of information with the Secretary of State and that has 500 or more employees in California to collect specified information on gender wage differentials. The bill would require the employer to submit the information to the Secretary of State as specified, by July 1, 2020, and biennially thereafter. The bill would require the Secretary of State to publish the information described above on an Internet Web site available to the public upon receiving necessary funding and establishing adequate mechanisms and procedures.
- Who sponsors AB 1209?
- AB 1209 is sponsored by Gonzalez Fletcher, Eggman, Gomez, Jones-Sawyer, Kalra, Ash (Democratic), Leyva, McCarty, Santiago, Skinner, Thurmond, Weber, Bonta, Mia (Democratic), Garcia, Robert (Democratic), and Mark Stone.
- What is the current status of AB 1209?
- This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1209?
- Track AB 1209 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1209
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1209
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →