California 2017-2018 Regular Session Status: Passed Assembly

AB 1380 — Developmental services: regional center services.

Last action — In committee: Held under submission.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law, the Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act, requires the State Department of Developmental Services to enter into contracts with private nonprofit corporations to operate regional centers for the provision of community services and supports for persons with developmental disabilities and their families. Existing law sets forth the duties of the regional centers, including, but not limited to, development of individual program plans, the purchase of needed services to implement the plan, and monitoring of the delivery of those services. This bill would require all regional center contracts to include provisions requiring the regional center to develop a process by which all vendor contracts are reviewed at least once every 2 years and to require that the regional center take appropriate action to ensure that vendors comply with the contracts, up to and including terminating the vendorization if necessary. The bill would also require each regional center to submit the findings of the vendor contract reviews to the department. The bill would require the department to submit a report to the Legislature describing in detail the outcomes of the reviews, including what steps are being taken by each regional center to ensure that vendors comply with contract requirements and how many, if any, contracts are terminated as a result of the reviews. Existing law authorizes the provision of in-home respite care for regional center consumers and specifies training requirements for those providers. This bill would require an employer to submit the fingerprints of a prospective in-home respite worker to the Department of Justice for a criminal background check prior to employment. The bill would prohibit employment of an in-home respite worker that has been convicted for, or incarcerated following conviction for, specified crimes, including fraud against a government health program or a serious or violent felony, as specified, and would authorize a consumer or an applicant to petition the State Department of Developmental Services for a waiver of, or to seek an exception from, as applicable, these provisions. The bill would also require the State Department of Developmental Services to conduct an in-depth review of in-home respite provider rates by November 1, 2018, and to report the results of that review, on or before January 1, 2020, to the Legislature, as provided. Existing law requires an entity that receives payments from one or more regional centers to contract with an independent accounting firm to obtain an independent audit or independent review report of its financial statements relating to payments made by regional centers. This bill would specifically require the State Department of Developmental Services to collect in-home respite care vendors' financial statements.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. In committee: Held under submission.

  2. In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  3. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 3.) (July 11). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  4. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on HUMAN S.

  5. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  6. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on HUMAN S.

  7. Referred to Com. on HUMAN S.

  8. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  9. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 46. Noes 23. Page 2004.)

  10. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  11. Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Ayes 52. Noes 24. Page 1776.)

  12. Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.

  13. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 4.) (May 26).

  14. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  15. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  16. Read second time and amended.

  17. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (April 25).

  18. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  19. Referred to Com. on HUM. S.

  20. From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.

  21. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Santiago · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 13 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Santiago

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Placed on suspense file

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6000
Democratic 1000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Bates — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Hill — Yea
Beall — Yea
Lara — Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

AB 1380 SANTIAGO Assembly Third Reading

Passed 46 Yea · 23 Nay · 11 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 351608
Democratic 11301
Republican 0402
Total 4623011
% of votes cast 58%29%0%14%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Acosta — Nay
Bigelow — Not Voting
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Nay
Levine — Yea
Maienschein — Not Voting
Mullin — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Waldron — Nay
Weber — Not Voting
Cooley — Yea
Eggman — Not Voting
Cunningham — Nay
Dababneh — Yea
Daly — Not Voting
Frazier — Nay
Gomez — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Gloria — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Salas — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Harper — Nay
Gray — Yea
Chau — Yea
Gonzalez Fletcher — Yea
Holden — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Kiley — Nay
Fong — Nay
Chiu — Yea
Low — Yea
Mathis — Nay
Baker — Nay
Chu — Yea
Chávez — Nay
Cooper — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Medina — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Obernolte — Nay
Rendon — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Steinorth — Nay
Ting — Yea
Voepel — Nay
Wood — Yea
Burke — Not Voting
Mayes — Not Voting
Melendez — Not Voting
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Nay
Mark Stone — Yea
Travis Allen — Nay
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Not Voting
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Nay
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Nay
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Nay
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Nay
Choi, Steven S. Republican Not Voting
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Flora, Heath Republican Not Voting
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Lackey, Tom Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 12 Yea · 4 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 8300
Democratic 4100
Republican 0001
Total 12401
% of votes cast 71%24%0%6%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Nay
Quirk — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Gray — Yea
Gonzalez Fletcher — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Bigelow — Nay
McCarty — Yea
Obernolte — Nay
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Nay
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety healthcare labor
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 1380 do?
Existing law, the Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act, requires the State Department of Developmental Services to enter into contracts with private nonprofit corporations to operate regional centers for the provision of community services and supports for persons with developmental disabilities and their families. Existing law sets forth the duties of the regional centers, including, but not limited to, development of individual program plans, the purchase of needed services to implement the plan, and monitoring of the delivery of those services. This bill would require all regional center contracts to include provisions requiring the regional center to develop a process by which all vendor contracts are reviewed at least once every 2 years and to require that the regional center take appropriate action to ensure that vendors comply with the contracts, up to and including terminating the vendorization if necessary. The bill would also require each regional center to submit the findings of the vendor contract reviews to the department. The bill would require the department to submit a report to the Legislature describing in detail the outcomes of the reviews, including what steps are being taken by each regional center to ensure that vendors comply with contract requirements and how many, if any, contracts are terminated as a result of the reviews. Existing law authorizes the provision of in-home respite care for regional center consumers and specifies training requirements for those providers. This bill would require an employer to submit the fingerprints of a prospective in-home respite worker to the Department of Justice for a criminal background check prior to employment. The bill would prohibit employment of an in-home respite worker that has been convicted for, or incarcerated following conviction for, specified crimes, including fraud against a government health program or a serious or violent felony, as specified, and would authorize a consumer or an applicant to petition the State Department of Developmental Services for a waiver of, or to seek an exception from, as applicable, these provisions. The bill would also require the State Department of Developmental Services to conduct an in-depth review of in-home respite provider rates by November 1, 2018, and to report the results of that review, on or before January 1, 2020, to the Legislature, as provided. Existing law requires an entity that receives payments from one or more regional centers to contract with an independent accounting firm to obtain an independent audit or independent review report of its financial statements relating to payments made by regional centers. This bill would specifically require the State Department of Developmental Services to collect in-home respite care vendors' financial statements.
Who sponsors AB 1380?
AB 1380 is sponsored by Santiago.
What is the current status of AB 1380?
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 1380?
Track AB 1380 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 1380

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 1380

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →