California 2017-2018 Regular Session Status: Enacted

SB 28 — State public employment: memoranda of understanding: approval.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 1, Statutes of 2017.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 05, 2016. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 5 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) Existing law provides that a provision of a memorandum of understanding reached between the state employer and a recognized employee organization representing state civil service employees that requires the expenditure of funds does not become effective unless approved by the Legislature in the annual Budget Act. This bill would approve provisions requiring the expenditure of funds in the memoranda of understanding entered into between the state employer and State Bargaining Unit 1, Professional, Administrative, Financial, and Staff Services, State Bargaining Unit 3, Professional Educators and Librarians, State Bargaining Unit 4, Office and Allied, State Bargaining Unit 8, Firefighters, State Bargaining Unit 11, Engineering and Scientific Technicians, State Bargaining Unit 12, Craft and Maintenance, State Bargaining Unit 13, Stationary Engineers, State Bargaining Unit 14, Printing and Allied Trades, State Bargaining Unit 15, Allied services, State Bargaining Unit 17, Registered Nurses, State Bargaining Unit 18, Psychiatric Technicians, State Bargaining Unit 19, Health and Social Services/Professional, State Bargaining Unit 20, Medical and Social Services, and State Bargaining Unit 21, Educational Consultant and Library. This bill would provide that provisions of the memoranda of understanding described above and approved by this bill that require the expenditure of funds will not take effect unless funds for those provisions are specifically appropriated by the Legislature. The bill would authorize the state employer and the affected employee organization to meet and confer to renegotiate the affected provisions if funds for those provisions are not specifically appropriated by the Legislature. The bill would require that the provisions of these memoranda of understanding that require the expenditure of funds to become effective even if these provisions are approved by the Legislature in legislation other than the annual Budget Act. The bill would appropriate to the Controller from the General Fund, unallocated special funds, including federal funds and unallocated nongovernmental cost funds, and any other fund from which state employees are compensated, the amount necessary for the payment of compensation and employee benefits to state employees covered by the applicable memoranda of understanding described above if the Budget Act is not enacted on or before July 1 in the 2017–18, 2018–19, 2019–20, or 2020–21 fiscal years, as specified. (2) The Public Employees' Medical and Hospital Care Act (PEMHCA) , which is administered by the Board of Administration of the Public Employees' Retirement System, prescribes methods for calculating the state employer contribution for postemployment health care benefits for eligible retired public employees and their families and for the vesting of these benefits. PEMHCA requires the employer contribution for an employee or annuitant who is in the employment of or retired from state service to be adjusted by the Legislature in the annual Budget Act, as specified. PEMHCA prescribes different ways of calculating the employer contributions for employees and annuitants depending on date of hire, years of service, and bargaining unit. This bill, for state employees who are first employed and become members of the retirement system on or after January 1, 2017, as specified, and are represented by, or related to, State Bargaining Units 8, 13, 18, and 19, would limit the employer contribution for annuitants to 80% of the weighted average of the health benefit plan premiums for an active employee enrolled for self-alone, during the benefit year to which the formula is applied, for the 4 health benefit plans with the largest state civil service enrollment, as specified. The bill would similarly limit the employer contribution for an enrolled family member of an annuitant to 80% of the weighted average of the additional premiums required for enrollment of those family members during the benefit year to which the formula is applied and would provide the same limit on employer contributions for annuitants enrolled in Medicare health benefit plans. This bill would prohibit state employees who are first employed and become members of the retirement system on or after January 1, 2017, as specified, and are represented by State Bargaining Units 8, 13, 18, and 19, from receiving any portion of the employer contribution payable for annuitants unless the person is credited with at least 15 years of state service at the time of retirement. The bill would prescribe the percentage of the employer contribution payable for postretirement health benefits for these employees based on the number of completed years of credited state service at retirement, with 50% after 15 credited years of service and 100% after 25 or more years of service. (3) PEMHCA generally requires that an employee or annuitant who is enrolled in, or whose family member is enrolled in, a Medicare health benefit plan be paid the amount of the Medicare Part B premiums, as specified, and prohibits this payment from exceeding the difference between the maximum employer contribution and the amount contributed by the employer toward the cost of premiums for the health benefit plan in which the employee or annuitant and his or her family members are enrolled. Existing law excepts from this requirement state employees who are first employed and become members of the retirement system on or after specified dates and are represented by, or related to, specified state bargaining units. This bill would also except from the requirement described above state employees who are first employed and become members of the retirement system on or after January 1, 2017, as specified, and are represented by, or related to, State Bargaining Units 8, 13, 18, and 19. (4) PEMHCA establishes the Public Employees' Contingency Reserve Fund for the purpose of funding health benefits and funding administrative expenses. PEMHCA establishes the Annuitants' Health Care Coverage Fund, which is continuously appropriated, for the purpose of prefunding health care coverage for annuitants, including administrative costs. PEMHCA defines "prefunding" for these purposes. Existing law requires the state and employees of State Bargaining Unit 2, 7, 9, 10, or 12 to prefund retiree health care with the goal of reaching a 50% cost sharing of normal costs by July 1, 2019, and prescribes schedules of contribution percentages in this regard. For the state and employees of State Bargaining Unit 6, the date for reaching the goal is July 1, 2018. This bill would require the state and employees of State Bargaining Unit 8, 13, 18, or 19, to prefund retiree health care with the goal of reaching a 50% cost sharing of normal costs by July 1, 2019. The bill would require the state and employees of State Bargaining Units 1, 3, 4, 11, 12, 14, 15, 17, 20, or 21, to prefund retiree health care with the goal of reaching a 50% cost sharing of normal costs by July 1, 2020. The bill would prescribe a schedule of contribution percentages in this regard for each of the affected bargaining units, with the contributions to be deposited in the Annuitants' Health Care Coverage Fund. By depositing new revenue in a continuously appropriated fund, this bill would make an appropriation. (5) Existing law, the State Employees' Dental Care Act, authorizes the state to enter into contracts, upon negotiations with employee organizations, with carriers for dental care plans for employees, annuitants, and eligible family members. Existing law permits these plans to include premiums to be paid by employees and annuitants and also authorizes the plans to be self-funded if an employer determines it to be cost effective. Existing law prohibits specified employees from receiving an employer contribution for these benefits for annuitants unless the person is credited with 10 or more years of state service or for other specified employees unless the person is credited with 15 or more years of state service. This bill would prohibit state employees, as specified, who are first employed and become members of the retirement system on or after January 1, 2017, as specified, and are represented by, or related to, State Bargaining Units 8, 13, 18, and 19, from receiving an employer contribution for dental benefits, as described above, for annuitants unless the person is credited with 15 or more years of state service. The bill would prescribe the percentage of the employer contribution payable for these dental benefits for these employees based on the number of completed years of credited state service at retirement, with 50% after 15 credited years of service and 100% after 25 or more years of service. (6) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 1, Statutes of 2017.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 2:30 p.m.

  4. In Senate. Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  5. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 61. Noes 14. Page 563.) Ordered to the Senate.

  6. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  7. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 22. Noes 5.) (March 2).

  8. Referred to Com. on BUDGET.

  9. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  10. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 26. Noes 7. Page 220.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  11. Motion by Senator Monning to lay on table amendments by Senator Stone adopted. (Ayes 25. Noes 9. Page 219.)

  12. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  13. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 4. Page 171.) (February 9).

  14. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R.

  15. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on B. & F.R. (Ayes 3. Noes 2. Page 162.) (February 6). Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R.

  16. Set for hearing February 9 in B. & F.R. pending receipt.

  17. Set for hearing February 6.

  18. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on P.E. & R.

  19. Re-referred to Coms. on P.E. & R. and B. & F.R.

  20. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  21. Withdrawn from committee.

  22. Referred to Com. on P.E. & R.

  23. From printer. May be acted upon on or after January 5.

  24. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Pan · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 9 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Pan

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 61 Yea · 14 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 44805
Democratic 15100
Republican 2500
Total 611405
% of votes cast 76%18%0%6%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Acosta — Nay
Baker — Nay
Bigelow — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Nay
Holden — Yea
Levine — Yea
Mathis — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Ting — Yea
Waldron — Not Voting
Wood — Yea
Chau — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Gonzalez Fletcher — Yea
Salas — Yea
Burke — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Harper — Nay
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Kiley — Nay
Low — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Mayes — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Medina — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Chu — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Melendez — Nay
Mullin — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Steinorth — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Voepel — Nay
Weber — Yea
Gray — Not Voting
O'Donnell — Not Voting
Ridley-Thomas — Not Voting
Cunningham — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Daly — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Gloria — Yea
Gomez — Not Voting
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Travis Allen — Nay
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Nay
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Nay
Choi, Steven S. Republican Nay
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Flora, Heath Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea
Patterson, Joe Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 22 Yea · 5 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 17301
Republican 1101
Democratic 4100
Total 22502
% of votes cast 76%17%0%7%
How each member voted (29)
Member Party Vote
Bloom — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Melendez — Nay
Mullin — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Wood — Yea
Mathis — Yea
Medina — Yea
Ting — Yea
Weber — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Harper — Nay
McCarty — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Cooper — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Voepel — Nay
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Travis Allen — Not Voting
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Nay
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
Choi, Steven S. Republican Nay
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea
Patterson, Joe Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

3rd Reading

Passed 26 Yea · 7 Nay · 7 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 22706
Democratic 4001
Total 26707
% of votes cast 65%18%0%18%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Hertzberg — Yea
Moorlach — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Dodd — Not Voting
Atkins — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Glazer — Not Voting
Allen — Yea
De León — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hill — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Lara — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Morrell — Not Voting
Newman — Yea
Pan — Yea
Roth — Yea
Vidak — Not Voting
Wilk — Not Voting
Anderson — Nay
Bates — Nay
Beall — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Galgiani — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Mark Stone — Nay
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Not Voting
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass

Passed 11 Yea · 4 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 9402
Democratic 2000
Total 11402
% of votes cast 65%24%0%12%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Nay
Mendoza — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Beall — Yea
Monning — Yea
Moorlach — Nay
Mitchell — Yea
Pan — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Roth — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Wilk — Nay
Glazer — Not Voting
Mark Stone — Not Voting
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 28 do?
(1) Existing law provides that a provision of a memorandum of understanding reached between the state employer and a recognized employee organization representing state civil service employees that requires the expenditure of funds does not become effective unless approved by the Legislature in the annual Budget Act. This bill would approve provisions requiring the expenditure of funds in the memoranda of understanding entered into between the state employer and State Bargaining Unit 1, Professional, Administrative, Financial, and Staff Services, State Bargaining Unit 3, Professional Educators and Librarians, State Bargaining Unit 4, Office and Allied, State Bargaining Unit 8, Firefighters, State Bargaining Unit 11, Engineering and Scientific Technicians, State Bargaining Unit 12, Craft and Maintenance, State Bargaining Unit 13, Stationary Engineers, State Bargaining Unit 14, Printing and Allied Trades, State Bargaining Unit 15, Allied services, State Bargaining Unit 17, Registered Nurses, State Bargaining Unit 18, Psychiatric Technicians, State Bargaining Unit 19, Health and Social Services/Professional, State Bargaining Unit 20, Medical and Social Services, and State Bargaining Unit 21, Educational Consultant and Library. This bill would provide that provisions of the memoranda of understanding described above and approved by this bill that require the expenditure of funds will not take effect unless funds for those provisions are specifically appropriated by the Legislature. The bill would authorize the state employer and the affected employee organization to meet and confer to renegotiate the affected provisions if funds for those provisions are not specifically appropriated by the Legislature. The bill would require that the provisions of these memoranda of understanding that require the expenditure of funds to become effective even if these provisions are approved by the Legislature in legislation other than the annual Budget Act. The bill would appropriate to the Controller from the General Fund, unallocated special funds, including federal funds and unallocated nongovernmental cost funds, and any other fund from which state employees are compensated, the amount necessary for the payment of compensation and employee benefits to state employees covered by the applicable memoranda of understanding described above if the Budget Act is not enacted on or before July 1 in the 2017–18, 2018–19, 2019–20, or 2020–21 fiscal years, as specified. (2) The Public Employees' Medical and Hospital Care Act (PEMHCA) , which is administered by the Board of Administration of the Public Employees' Retirement System, prescribes methods for calculating the state employer contribution for postemployment health care benefits for eligible retired public employees and their families and for the vesting of these benefits. PEMHCA requires the employer contribution for an employee or annuitant who is in the employment of or retired from state service to be adjusted by the Legislature in the annual Budget Act, as specified. PEMHCA prescribes different ways of calculating the employer contributions for employees and annuitants depending on date of hire, years of service, and bargaining unit. This bill, for state employees who are first employed and become members of the retirement system on or after January 1, 2017, as specified, and are represented by, or related to, State Bargaining Units 8, 13, 18, and 19, would limit the employer contribution for annuitants to 80% of the weighted average of the health benefit plan premiums for an active employee enrolled for self-alone, during the benefit year to which the formula is applied, for the 4 health benefit plans with the largest state civil service enrollment, as specified. The bill would similarly limit the employer contribution for an enrolled family member of an annuitant to 80% of the weighted average of the additional premiums required for enrollment of those family members during the benefit year to which the formula is applied and would provide the same limit on employer contributions for annuitants enrolled in Medicare health benefit plans. This bill would prohibit state employees who are first employed and become members of the retirement system on or after January 1, 2017, as specified, and are represented by State Bargaining Units 8, 13, 18, and 19, from receiving any portion of the employer contribution payable for annuitants unless the person is credited with at least 15 years of state service at the time of retirement. The bill would prescribe the percentage of the employer contribution payable for postretirement health benefits for these employees based on the number of completed years of credited state service at retirement, with 50% after 15 credited years of service and 100% after 25 or more years of service. (3) PEMHCA generally requires that an employee or annuitant who is enrolled in, or whose family member is enrolled in, a Medicare health benefit plan be paid the amount of the Medicare Part B premiums, as specified, and prohibits this payment from exceeding the difference between the maximum employer contribution and the amount contributed by the employer toward the cost of premiums for the health benefit plan in which the employee or annuitant and his or her family members are enrolled. Existing law excepts from this requirement state employees who are first employed and become members of the retirement system on or after specified dates and are represented by, or related to, specified state bargaining units. This bill would also except from the requirement described above state employees who are first employed and become members of the retirement system on or after January 1, 2017, as specified, and are represented by, or related to, State Bargaining Units 8, 13, 18, and 19. (4) PEMHCA establishes the Public Employees' Contingency Reserve Fund for the purpose of funding health benefits and funding administrative expenses. PEMHCA establishes the Annuitants' Health Care Coverage Fund, which is continuously appropriated, for the purpose of prefunding health care coverage for annuitants, including administrative costs. PEMHCA defines "prefunding" for these purposes. Existing law requires the state and employees of State Bargaining Unit 2, 7, 9, 10, or 12 to prefund retiree health care with the goal of reaching a 50% cost sharing of normal costs by July 1, 2019, and prescribes schedules of contribution percentages in this regard. For the state and employees of State Bargaining Unit 6, the date for reaching the goal is July 1, 2018. This bill would require the state and employees of State Bargaining Unit 8, 13, 18, or 19, to prefund retiree health care with the goal of reaching a 50% cost sharing of normal costs by July 1, 2019. The bill would require the state and employees of State Bargaining Units 1, 3, 4, 11, 12, 14, 15, 17, 20, or 21, to prefund retiree health care with the goal of reaching a 50% cost sharing of normal costs by July 1, 2020. The bill would prescribe a schedule of contribution percentages in this regard for each of the affected bargaining units, with the contributions to be deposited in the Annuitants' Health Care Coverage Fund. By depositing new revenue in a continuously appropriated fund, this bill would make an appropriation. (5) Existing law, the State Employees' Dental Care Act, authorizes the state to enter into contracts, upon negotiations with employee organizations, with carriers for dental care plans for employees, annuitants, and eligible family members. Existing law permits these plans to include premiums to be paid by employees and annuitants and also authorizes the plans to be self-funded if an employer determines it to be cost effective. Existing law prohibits specified employees from receiving an employer contribution for these benefits for annuitants unless the person is credited with 10 or more years of state service or for other specified employees unless the person is credited with 15 or more years of state service. This bill would prohibit state employees, as specified, who are first employed and become members of the retirement system on or after January 1, 2017, as specified, and are represented by, or related to, State Bargaining Units 8, 13, 18, and 19, from receiving an employer contribution for dental benefits, as described above, for annuitants unless the person is credited with 15 or more years of state service. The bill would prescribe the percentage of the employer contribution payable for these dental benefits for these employees based on the number of completed years of credited state service at retirement, with 50% after 15 credited years of service and 100% after 25 or more years of service. (6) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
Who sponsors SB 28?
SB 28 is sponsored by Pan.
What is the current status of SB 28?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 05, 2016. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 28?
Track SB 28 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 28

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 28

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →