AB 262 — Public contracts: bid specifications: Buy Clean California Act.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 816, Statutes of 2017.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 31, 2017. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
7 sponsors
1 primary, 6 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 5 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
The State Contract Act governs the bidding and award of public works contracts by specific state departments and requires an awarding department, before entering into any contract for a project, to prepare full, complete, and accurate plans and specifications and estimates of cost. Other existing law establishes specific requirements for competitive bidding for building and improvement projects by the Regents of the University of California, including requiring the regents to prepare plans and specifications before entering into a contract for a project. The California State University Contract Law governs contracting for building and improvement projects by the California State University and imposes specific competitive bidding requirements for the Trustees of the California State University, including requiring the trustees to prepare full, complete, and accurate plans and specifications for a project. This bill, the Buy Clean California Act, would, by January 1, 2019, require the Department of General Services to establish, and publish in the State Contracting Manual, a maximum acceptable global warming potential for each category of eligible materials, in accordance with requirements set out in the bill. The bill, by January 1, 2022, and every 3 years thereafter, would require the department to review the maximum acceptable global warming potential for each category of eligible materials established, and would authorize the department to adjust that number downward for any eligible material to reflect industry improvements, as provided. The bill, for specified types of contracts entered into on or after July 1, 2019, would require an awarding authority to require a successful bidder to submit a current Environmental Product Declaration, developed in accordance with specified standards, for that type of product. The bill would require an awarding authority to include in a specification for a bid for an eligible project, as defined, that the facility-specific global warming potential for any eligible materials does not exceed the maximum global warming potential for that material determined by the department in accordance with the process described above. The bill would also authorize an awarding authority to include in a specification for bids for an eligible project a facility-specific global warming potential for any eligible material that is lower than the maximum global warming potential for that material as determined by the department in accordance with the process described above. The bill would prohibit a successful bidder from installing any eligible materials on an eligible project until that bidder submits an Environmental Product Declaration to the awarding authority for that project. The bill would require an awarding authority, in carrying out its duties under the act, to strive to continuously reduce emissions over time. The bill would define "awarding authority" for these purposes to include state departments and entities subject to the State Contract Act, the Regents of the University of California, and the Trustees of the California State University. The bill, by January 1, 2022, would require the department to submit a report to the Legislature on any obstacles to the implementation of this article, and the effectiveness of this article in reducing global warming potential.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/15/17 - Chaptered Current pdf October 15, 2017
- Enrolled 09/15/17 - Enrolled pdf September 15, 2017
- Amended 07/19/17 - Amended Senate pdf July 19, 2017
- Amended 06/20/17 - Amended Senate pdf June 20, 2017
- Amended 05/30/17 - Amended Assembly pdf May 30, 2017
- Amended 05/10/17 - Amended Assembly pdf May 10, 2017
- Amended 03/27/17 - Amended Assembly pdf March 27, 2017
- Introduced 01/31/17 - Introduced pdf January 31, 2017
- AB262 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 816, Statutes of 2017.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4:30 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 64. Noes 12. Page 3282.).
-
Assembly Rule 77(a) suspended. (Page 3254.)
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 14 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 30. Noes 9. Page 2696.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (September 1).
-
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (July 5). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on EQ. (Ayes 11. Noes 1.) (June 27). Re-referred to Com. on EQ.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on G.O.
-
Referred to Coms. on G.O. and EQ.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 68. Noes 3. Page 1954.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Ayes 52. Noes 24. Page 1776.)
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 26).
-
Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 1.) (April 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (April 19). Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
In committee: Reconsideration granted.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Failed passage.
-
Re-referred to Com. on A. & A.R.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on A. & A.R. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Coms. on A. & A.R. and NAT. RES.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 3.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Bloom · Cosponsor
- Chiu · Cosponsor
- Eggman · Cosponsor
- Galgiani · Cosponsor
- Mullin · Cosponsor
- Steinorth · Cosponsor
- Mia Bonta · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 6 co-sponsors · 115 not signed on · 4 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Bonta, Mia Democratic
Co-sponsors (6)
- Bloom
- Chiu
- Eggman
- Galgiani
- Mullin
- Steinorth
Not signed on (115)
115 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 115 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 44 | 11 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 64 | 12 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 81% | 15% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Acosta | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Nay |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Nay |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Not Voting |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Mayes | — | Not Voting |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Not Voting |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Yea |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Nay |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 26 | 8 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 30 | 9 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 75% | 23% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Newman | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Nay |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 14% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 262 do?
- The State Contract Act governs the bidding and award of public works contracts by specific state departments and requires an awarding department, before entering into any contract for a project, to prepare full, complete, and accurate plans and specifications and estimates of cost. Other existing law establishes specific requirements for competitive bidding for building and improvement projects by the Regents of the University of California, including requiring the regents to prepare plans and specifications before entering into a contract for a project. The California State University Contract Law governs contracting for building and improvement projects by the California State University and imposes specific competitive bidding requirements for the Trustees of the California State University, including requiring the trustees to prepare full, complete, and accurate plans and specifications for a project. This bill, the Buy Clean California Act, would, by January 1, 2019, require the Department of General Services to establish, and publish in the State Contracting Manual, a maximum acceptable global warming potential for each category of eligible materials, in accordance with requirements set out in the bill. The bill, by January 1, 2022, and every 3 years thereafter, would require the department to review the maximum acceptable global warming potential for each category of eligible materials established, and would authorize the department to adjust that number downward for any eligible material to reflect industry improvements, as provided. The bill, for specified types of contracts entered into on or after July 1, 2019, would require an awarding authority to require a successful bidder to submit a current Environmental Product Declaration, developed in accordance with specified standards, for that type of product. The bill would require an awarding authority to include in a specification for a bid for an eligible project, as defined, that the facility-specific global warming potential for any eligible materials does not exceed the maximum global warming potential for that material determined by the department in accordance with the process described above. The bill would also authorize an awarding authority to include in a specification for bids for an eligible project a facility-specific global warming potential for any eligible material that is lower than the maximum global warming potential for that material as determined by the department in accordance with the process described above. The bill would prohibit a successful bidder from installing any eligible materials on an eligible project until that bidder submits an Environmental Product Declaration to the awarding authority for that project. The bill would require an awarding authority, in carrying out its duties under the act, to strive to continuously reduce emissions over time. The bill would define "awarding authority" for these purposes to include state departments and entities subject to the State Contract Act, the Regents of the University of California, and the Trustees of the California State University. The bill, by January 1, 2022, would require the department to submit a report to the Legislature on any obstacles to the implementation of this article, and the effectiveness of this article in reducing global warming potential.
- Who sponsors AB 262?
- AB 262 is sponsored by Bloom, Chiu, Eggman, Galgiani, Mullin, Steinorth, and Bonta, Mia (Democratic).
- What is the current status of AB 262?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 31, 2017. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 262?
- Track AB 262 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 262
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 262
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →