California 2017-2018 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate

SB 377 — Lead-based paint.

Last action — Ordered to inactive file on request of Assembly Member Calderon.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law requires the State Department of Public Health to implement and administer a residential lead-based paint hazard reduction program, as specified, including adopting regulations regarding accreditation of providers of health and safety training to employees who engage in or supervise lead-related construction work, as defined, and certification of employees who have successfully completed that training. Existing law requires the department to adopt regulations to establish and impose fees for those accreditations and certifications and for licensing entities engaged in lead-related occupations, as specified. Existing law requires those fees to be deposited into the Lead-Related Construction Fund, as specified, and to be available upon appropriation by the Legislature. This bill would require the department, within one year of the Legislature providing sufficient funding, to review and amend its regulations governing lead-related construction work, including training and certification for workers and accreditation for trainers in lead-safe work practices, to comply with existing state regulations and the United States Environmental Protection Agency's Lead Renovation, Repair, and Painting Rule, as specified. The bill would require the adoption of those regulations to establish fee provisions for those certifications and accreditations. The bill would require the fees to be deposited into the Lead-Related Construction Fund. The bill also would make these provisions effective one year after the Legislature appropriates sufficient moneys for the implementation of the program, as provided, and would require the department to adopt emergency regulations to implement these provisions, as specified. Existing law requires certain persons engaged in lead construction work to have a certificate. A violation of that provision is a crime. This bill would further require a firm, as defined, and at least one person onsite and employed by a firm, doing renovation, repair, or painting work that will disturb lead-based paint or presumed lead-based paint, as defined, to have a certificate under these provisions. The bill would also make a violation of these provisions punishable by imprisonment in the county jail, by a fine of not more than $37,500, or by both that imprisonment and fine. By creating a new crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Ordered to inactive file on request of Assembly Member Calderon.

  2. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  3. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 5.) (September 1).

  4. Joint Rule 62(a) suspended.

  5. August 30 set for first hearing. Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  6. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  7. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 11). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  8. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.

  9. Referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.

  10. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  11. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 27. Noes 12. Page 1323.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  12. Published May 26 at 10 a.m.

  13. Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.

  14. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 1183.) (May 25).

  15. Set for hearing May 25.

  16. April 17 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  17. Set for hearing April 17.

  18. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1. Page 622.) (April 5). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  19. Set for hearing April 5.

  20. Referred to Com. on EQ.

  21. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 17.

  22. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Monning · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 5 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Monning

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Do pass.

Passed 11 Yea · 5 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 8401
Democratic 3000
Republican 0100
Total 11501
% of votes cast 65%29%0%6%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Nay
Eggman — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Gonzalez Fletcher — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Fong — Nay
Gray — Not Voting
Chau — Yea
Bigelow — Nay
Obernolte — Nay
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Nay

Official roll call →

3rd Reading

Passed 27 Yea · 12 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 231101
Democratic 4100
Total 271201
% of votes cast 68%30%0%3%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Nay
Beall — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Hill — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Galgiani — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Allen — Yea
De León — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Lara — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Bates — Nay
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Moorlach — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Newman — Yea
Pan — Yea
Roth — Yea
Vidak — Nay
Wieckowski — Yea
Wilk — Nay
Portantino — Not Voting
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Mark Stone — Nay
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Nay
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended

Passed 5 Yea · 2 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 4200
Democratic 1000
Total 5200
% of votes cast 71%29%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Bates — Nay
Bradford — Yea
Hill — Yea
Lara — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Beall — Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Placed on suspense file

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6000
Democratic 1000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Bradford — Yea
Hill — Yea
Lara — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Bates — Yea
Beall — Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety environment health-insurance
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 377 do?
Existing law requires the State Department of Public Health to implement and administer a residential lead-based paint hazard reduction program, as specified, including adopting regulations regarding accreditation of providers of health and safety training to employees who engage in or supervise lead-related construction work, as defined, and certification of employees who have successfully completed that training. Existing law requires the department to adopt regulations to establish and impose fees for those accreditations and certifications and for licensing entities engaged in lead-related occupations, as specified. Existing law requires those fees to be deposited into the Lead-Related Construction Fund, as specified, and to be available upon appropriation by the Legislature. This bill would require the department, within one year of the Legislature providing sufficient funding, to review and amend its regulations governing lead-related construction work, including training and certification for workers and accreditation for trainers in lead-safe work practices, to comply with existing state regulations and the United States Environmental Protection Agency's Lead Renovation, Repair, and Painting Rule, as specified. The bill would require the adoption of those regulations to establish fee provisions for those certifications and accreditations. The bill would require the fees to be deposited into the Lead-Related Construction Fund. The bill also would make these provisions effective one year after the Legislature appropriates sufficient moneys for the implementation of the program, as provided, and would require the department to adopt emergency regulations to implement these provisions, as specified. Existing law requires certain persons engaged in lead construction work to have a certificate. A violation of that provision is a crime. This bill would further require a firm, as defined, and at least one person onsite and employed by a firm, doing renovation, repair, or painting work that will disturb lead-based paint or presumed lead-based paint, as defined, to have a certificate under these provisions. The bill would also make a violation of these provisions punishable by imprisonment in the county jail, by a fine of not more than $37,500, or by both that imprisonment and fine. By creating a new crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors SB 377?
SB 377 is sponsored by Monning.
What is the current status of SB 377?
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 377?
Track SB 377 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 377

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 377

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →