Children's meals.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 1192 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 1192.
You're tracking SB 1192
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 1192 — Children's meals.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 608, Statutes of 2018.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 15, 2018. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 6 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law, the California Retail Food Code, establishes uniform health and sanitation standards for, and provides for regulation by the State Department of Public Health of, retail food facilities, as defined, and requires local enforcement agencies to enforce these provisions. Under existing law, a person who violates any provision of the code is guilty of a misdemeanor with each offense punishable by a fine of not less than $25 or more than $1,000, or by imprisonment in a county jail for a term not exceeding 6 months, or by both that fine and imprisonment. This bill would require a restaurant, as defined, that sells a children's meal that includes a beverage, to make the default beverage water, sparkling water, or flavored water, as specified, or unflavored milk or a nondairy milk alternative, as specified. The bill would not prohibit a restaurant's ability to sell, or a customer's ability to purchase, an alternative beverage if the purchaser requests one. The bill would make a violation of its provisions an infraction, but would make the first violation subject to a notice of violation. Under the bill, the 2nd and 3rd violations would be punishable by fines of not more than $250 and $500, respectively. By imposing additional duties on local enforcement agencies and by creating a new crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/20/18 - Chaptered Current pdf September 20, 2018
- Enrolled 08/23/18 - Enrolled pdf August 23, 2018
- Amended 07/05/18 - Amended Assembly pdf July 05, 2018
- Amended 06/12/18 - Amended Assembly pdf June 12, 2018
- Amended 04/11/18 - Amended Senate pdf April 11, 2018
- Amended 03/21/18 - Amended Senate pdf March 21, 2018
- Introduced 02/15/18 - Introduced pdf February 15, 2018
- SB1192 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 608, Statutes of 2018.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:30 p.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 29. Noes 9. Page 5565.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 46. Noes 26. Page 6306.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 4.) (June 27).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (June 19). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 32. Noes 7. Page 4219.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
-
Set for hearing May 14.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 4746.) (April 18). Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
Set for hearing April 18.
-
Re-referred to Coms. on HEALTH and PUB. S.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Referred to Com. on RLS.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 18.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Monning · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 9 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Monning
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 25 | 8 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 29 | 9 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 23% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Nay |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Nay |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Delgado | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Not Voting |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Nay |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 32 | 21 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 14 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 46 | 26 | 0 | 8 |
| % of votes cast | 58% | 33% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Acosta | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Kamlager-Dove | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Nay |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Not Voting |
| Fong | — | Nay |
| Salas | — | Nay |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Gray | — | Nay |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Nay |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Rivas | — | Not Voting |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Nay |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Nay |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Cooley | — | Not Voting |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Nay |
| Voepel | — | Nay |
| Cunningham | — | Nay |
| Daly | — | Not Voting |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Not Voting |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Nay |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Nay |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Not Voting |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 24% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Not Voting |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Nay |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 12 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 0% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Not Voting |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Not Voting |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 27 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 32 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 82% | 18% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Newman | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Newman | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Not Voting |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1192 do?
- Existing law, the California Retail Food Code, establishes uniform health and sanitation standards for, and provides for regulation by the State Department of Public Health of, retail food facilities, as defined, and requires local enforcement agencies to enforce these provisions. Under existing law, a person who violates any provision of the code is guilty of a misdemeanor with each offense punishable by a fine of not less than $25 or more than $1,000, or by imprisonment in a county jail for a term not exceeding 6 months, or by both that fine and imprisonment. This bill would require a restaurant, as defined, that sells a children's meal that includes a beverage, to make the default beverage water, sparkling water, or flavored water, as specified, or unflavored milk or a nondairy milk alternative, as specified. The bill would not prohibit a restaurant's ability to sell, or a customer's ability to purchase, an alternative beverage if the purchaser requests one. The bill would make a violation of its provisions an infraction, but would make the first violation subject to a notice of violation. Under the bill, the 2nd and 3rd violations would be punishable by fines of not more than $250 and $500, respectively. By imposing additional duties on local enforcement agencies and by creating a new crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
- Who sponsors SB 1192?
- SB 1192 is sponsored by Monning.
- What is the current status of SB 1192?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 15, 2018. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 1192?
- Track SB 1192 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1192
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1192
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →