Tax preparers.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 3143 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 3143.
You're tracking AB 3143
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 3143 — Tax preparers.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 597, Statutes of 2018.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 16, 2018. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 9 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law regulates tax preparers and states that it is the intent of the provisions governing the regulation of tax preparers to enable consumers to easily identify credible tax preparers who are bonded and registered, to ensure tax preparers receive adequate education and treat confidential information appropriately, to prohibit tax preparers from making fraudulent, untrue, or misleading representations, and to provide for the California Tax Education Council (council) to register tax preparers and ensure that they meet all necessary requirements. Existing law, for the purposes of these provisions, defines client to mean an individual for whom a tax preparer performs or agrees to perform tax preparation services, and defines the council as a single nonprofit organization exempt from taxation and made up of representatives from specified entities. Existing law requires the council to issue a registration to any applicant who provides satisfactory evidence that he or she meets specified requirements and who complies with the rules established by the council. Existing law requires a tax preparer to provide to the customer in writing specified information prior to rendering any tax preparation services. Except as specified, a violation of these provisions is a crime. Existing law repeals these provisions on January 1, 2019. The Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act requires, with specified exceptions, that all meetings of a state body be open and public and all persons be permitted to attend. This bill would name these provisions the Tax Preparation Act, and would require a tax preparer, on and after July 1, 2019, to report a paid claim against its surety bond to the council, which would be required to post a notice of the claim on its Internet Web site. The bill would extend the definition of client to the term "customer." The bill would establish public protection as the council's highest priority in exercising its registration and disciplinary authority and other functions. The bill would make the meetings of the council's board of directors subject to the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act. The bill would require the council to establish and maintain on its Internet Web site a searchable public registry of registrants with specified information about each registrant. The bill would require a tax preparer to include the address of the council's Internet Web site in the information the tax preparer is required to provide to a customer before rendering services. The bill would direct the council to require an applicant, beginning July 1, 2020, to submit fingerprint images for submission to the Department of Justice, and would require the Department of Justice to compile and disseminate a fitness determination regarding the applicant based on the applicant's criminal offender record information, as prescribed. The bill would require the Department of Justice and the council to charge a fee sufficient to cover the costs of processing the request for state- and federal-level criminal offender record information. The bill would include among the list of persons exempt from the act an employee supervised by a person who is exempt from the act, subject to specified conditions. The bill would extend the operation of the act's provisions to January 1, 2023. By extending the operation of these provisions, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/20/18 - Chaptered Current pdf September 20, 2018
- Enrolled 09/04/18 - Enrolled pdf September 04, 2018
- Amended 08/21/18 - Amended Senate pdf August 21, 2018
- Amended 06/21/18 - Amended Senate pdf June 21, 2018
- Introduced 02/16/18 - Introduced pdf February 16, 2018
- AB3143 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 597, Statutes of 2018.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4:30 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 80. Noes 0. Page 6984.).
-
From committee: That the Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (August 29).
-
Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Page 6729.)
-
Re-referred to Com. on B. & P. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 29 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 5810.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 16).
-
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (June 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
-
Referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 73. Noes 0. Page 5218.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (May 9).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (April 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on B. & P.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Hill · Cosponsor
- Low · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Low
Co-sponsors (1)
- Hill
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 58 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 80 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Acosta | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Kamlager-Dove | — | Yea |
| Rivas | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Yea |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 15 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 79% | 0% | 0% | 21% |
How each member voted (19)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Not Voting |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Not Voting |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 34 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 39 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Delgado | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Not Voting |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 53 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 14 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 73 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 0% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (78)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Acosta | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Not Voting |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Not Voting |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Kamlager-Dove | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Not Voting |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Not Voting |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Yea |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 0% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Not Voting |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 15 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 0% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (16)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 3143 do?
- Existing law regulates tax preparers and states that it is the intent of the provisions governing the regulation of tax preparers to enable consumers to easily identify credible tax preparers who are bonded and registered, to ensure tax preparers receive adequate education and treat confidential information appropriately, to prohibit tax preparers from making fraudulent, untrue, or misleading representations, and to provide for the California Tax Education Council (council) to register tax preparers and ensure that they meet all necessary requirements. Existing law, for the purposes of these provisions, defines client to mean an individual for whom a tax preparer performs or agrees to perform tax preparation services, and defines the council as a single nonprofit organization exempt from taxation and made up of representatives from specified entities. Existing law requires the council to issue a registration to any applicant who provides satisfactory evidence that he or she meets specified requirements and who complies with the rules established by the council. Existing law requires a tax preparer to provide to the customer in writing specified information prior to rendering any tax preparation services. Except as specified, a violation of these provisions is a crime. Existing law repeals these provisions on January 1, 2019. The Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act requires, with specified exceptions, that all meetings of a state body be open and public and all persons be permitted to attend. This bill would name these provisions the Tax Preparation Act, and would require a tax preparer, on and after July 1, 2019, to report a paid claim against its surety bond to the council, which would be required to post a notice of the claim on its Internet Web site. The bill would extend the definition of client to the term "customer." The bill would establish public protection as the council's highest priority in exercising its registration and disciplinary authority and other functions. The bill would make the meetings of the council's board of directors subject to the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act. The bill would require the council to establish and maintain on its Internet Web site a searchable public registry of registrants with specified information about each registrant. The bill would require a tax preparer to include the address of the council's Internet Web site in the information the tax preparer is required to provide to a customer before rendering services. The bill would direct the council to require an applicant, beginning July 1, 2020, to submit fingerprint images for submission to the Department of Justice, and would require the Department of Justice to compile and disseminate a fitness determination regarding the applicant based on the applicant's criminal offender record information, as prescribed. The bill would require the Department of Justice and the council to charge a fee sufficient to cover the costs of processing the request for state- and federal-level criminal offender record information. The bill would include among the list of persons exempt from the act an employee supervised by a person who is exempt from the act, subject to specified conditions. The bill would extend the operation of the act's provisions to January 1, 2023. By extending the operation of these provisions, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 3143?
- AB 3143 is sponsored by Hill and Low.
- What is the current status of AB 3143?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 16, 2018. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 3143?
- Track AB 3143 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 3143
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 3143
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →