Conservatorships: custody status.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 931 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 931.
You're tracking SB 931
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 931 — Conservatorships: custody status.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 458, Statutes of 2018.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 25, 2018. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 5 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Under existing law, a professional person in charge of an agency providing comprehensive evaluation or a facility providing intensive treatment for a gravely disabled person may recommend a conservatorship for that person without that person being an inpatient in a facility providing comprehensive evaluation or intensive treatment, if specified conditions are met. This bill would expand that authority to a professional person in charge of providing mental health treatment at a county jail or his or her designee. Existing law also authorizes initiation of conservatorship proceedings for, among others, a person who has been transferred from a county jail to a specified mental health facility for 72-hour evaluation and treatment, upon a recommendation to the conservatorship investigator of the appropriate county, as specified. Under existing law, the initiation of conservatorship proceedings or the existence of a conservatorship does not affect pending criminal proceedings for that person. This bill would additionally prohibit a conservatorship investigator from failing to schedule an investigation based upon the custody status of a person who is subject to a conservatorship investigation.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/17/18 - Chaptered Current pdf September 17, 2018
- Enrolled 08/23/18 - Enrolled pdf August 23, 2018
- Amended 03/19/18 - Amended Senate pdf March 19, 2018
- Introduced 01/25/18 - Introduced pdf January 25, 2018
- SB931 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 458, Statutes of 2018.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:30 p.m.
-
In Senate. Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 80. Noes 0. Page 6406.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Ordered to second reading.
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (June 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 12). Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
Referred to Coms. on JUD. and HEALTH.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 4640.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 4515.) (April 3).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
Set for hearing April 3.
-
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after February 25.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Hertzberg · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Hertzberg
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 58 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 80 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Acosta | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Rivas | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Kamlager-Dove | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Yea |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 0% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Holden | — | Not Voting |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 33 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 38 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Newman | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Not Voting |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Not Voting |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 931 do?
- Under existing law, a professional person in charge of an agency providing comprehensive evaluation or a facility providing intensive treatment for a gravely disabled person may recommend a conservatorship for that person without that person being an inpatient in a facility providing comprehensive evaluation or intensive treatment, if specified conditions are met. This bill would expand that authority to a professional person in charge of providing mental health treatment at a county jail or his or her designee. Existing law also authorizes initiation of conservatorship proceedings for, among others, a person who has been transferred from a county jail to a specified mental health facility for 72-hour evaluation and treatment, upon a recommendation to the conservatorship investigator of the appropriate county, as specified. Under existing law, the initiation of conservatorship proceedings or the existence of a conservatorship does not affect pending criminal proceedings for that person. This bill would additionally prohibit a conservatorship investigator from failing to schedule an investigation based upon the custody status of a person who is subject to a conservatorship investigation.
- Who sponsors SB 931?
- SB 931 is sponsored by Hertzberg.
- What is the current status of SB 931?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 25, 2018. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 931?
- Track SB 931 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 931
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 931
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →