SB 769 — Baccalaureate Degree Pilot Program.
Last action — September 1 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law, until July 1, 2023, authorizes the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges, in consultation with the California State University and the University of California, to establish a statewide baccalaureate degree pilot program. Existing law requires a district baccalaureate degree pilot program to commence by the beginning of the 2017–18 academic year and requires a student participating in a baccalaureate degree pilot program to complete his or her degree by the end of the 2022–23 academic year. This bill would extend the operation of the statewide baccalaureate degree pilot program until July 1, 2028, and would extend the time by which a student participating in a baccalaureate degree pilot program is required to complete his or her degree to the end of the 2027–28 academic year.
Bill Text
- Amended 07/13/17 - Amended Assembly Current pdf July 13, 2017
- Amended 07/03/17 - Amended Assembly pdf July 03, 2017
- Amended 05/26/17 - Amended Senate pdf May 26, 2017
- Amended 05/08/17 - Amended Senate pdf May 08, 2017
- Amended 04/17/17 - Amended Senate pdf April 17, 2017
- Amended 03/27/17 - Amended Senate pdf March 27, 2017
- Introduced 02/17/17 - Introduced pdf February 17, 2017
- SB769 View text html
Action History
-
September 1 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
-
August 23 set for first hearing. Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 1.) (July 11).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.
-
Referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 38. Noes 2. Page 1335.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Published May 26 at 10 a.m.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 1. Page 1190.) (May 25).
-
Set for hearing May 25.
-
May 15 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing May 15.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 849.) (April 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on ED.
-
Set for hearing April 26.
-
April 5 hearing postponed by committee.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on ED.
-
Set for hearing April 5.
-
Referred to Com. on ED.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 23.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Beall · Cosponsor
- Dodd · Cosponsor
- Galgiani · Cosponsor
- Glazer · Cosponsor
- Hill · Primary
- Hueso · Cosponsor
- Mendoza · Cosponsor
- Newman · Cosponsor
- Henry I. Stern · Cosponsor
- Wilk · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 9 co-sponsors · 112 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Hill
Co-sponsors (9)
- Beall
- Dodd
- Galgiani
- Glazer
- Hueso
- Mendoza
- Newman
- Stern, Henry I. Democratic
- Wilk
Not signed on (112)
112 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 112 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 8% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Low | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Nay |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 33 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 38 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 5% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Nay |
| Newman | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 14% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 769 do?
- Existing law, until July 1, 2023, authorizes the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges, in consultation with the California State University and the University of California, to establish a statewide baccalaureate degree pilot program. Existing law requires a district baccalaureate degree pilot program to commence by the beginning of the 2017–18 academic year and requires a student participating in a baccalaureate degree pilot program to complete his or her degree by the end of the 2022–23 academic year. This bill would extend the operation of the statewide baccalaureate degree pilot program until July 1, 2028, and would extend the time by which a student participating in a baccalaureate degree pilot program is required to complete his or her degree to the end of the 2027–28 academic year.
- Who sponsors SB 769?
- SB 769 is sponsored by Beall, Dodd, Galgiani, Glazer, Hill, Hueso, Mendoza, Newman, Stern, Henry I. (Democratic), and Wilk.
- What is the current status of SB 769?
- This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 769?
- Track SB 769 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 769
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 769
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →