California 2017-2018 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate

SB 1160 — Trespass: gaming facility on Indian lands.

Last action — June 26 set for second hearing canceled at the request of author.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law makes it a misdemeanor to commit a trespass by engaging in specified acts, including entering any lands for the purpose of injuring any property or property rights or with the intention of interfering with, obstructing, or injuring any lawful business or occupation carried on by the owner of the land, the owner's agent, or the person in lawful possession. This bill would additionally make it a misdemeanor to commit a trespass by entering a gaming facility, as defined, on the Indian lands of a federally recognized Indian tribe after receiving an order of exclusion from the designated agency of the tribal government, as defined. The bill would require the tribe, if the order of exclusion pertains to a labor organization or its representatives or eligible employees engaged in otherwise lawful labor activity, to first obtain a decision from the Tribal Labor Panel established by the tribal labor relations ordinance stating that the order of exclusion does not conflict with the tribal labor relations ordinance adopted by the tribe or with a labor contract that is subject to the authority of the Tribal Labor Panel and applicable to the gaming facility. The bill would authorize a tribe to enter into an agreement with a law enforcement agency to enforce an order of exclusion, as specified. Because this bill would expand the scope of an existing crime, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. June 26 set for second hearing canceled at the request of author.

  2. June 19 hearing: Heard for testimony only.

  3. June 12 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.

  4. Referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  5. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  6. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 5011.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  7. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  8. From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.

  9. Set for hearing May 7.

  10. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 4818.) (April 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  11. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  12. Set for hearing April 24.

  13. April 10 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.

  14. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  15. Set for hearing April 10.

  16. Referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  17. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 17.

  18. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Hueso · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Hueso

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

3rd Reading

Passed 37 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 32002
Democratic 5000
Total 37002
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Bates — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Lara — Yea
Newman — Yea
Roth — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Monning — Yea
Allen — Yea
Cannella — Not Voting
De León — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hertzberg — Not Voting
Hill — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Beall — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Moorlach — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Pan — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety labor
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 1160 do?
Existing law makes it a misdemeanor to commit a trespass by engaging in specified acts, including entering any lands for the purpose of injuring any property or property rights or with the intention of interfering with, obstructing, or injuring any lawful business or occupation carried on by the owner of the land, the owner's agent, or the person in lawful possession. This bill would additionally make it a misdemeanor to commit a trespass by entering a gaming facility, as defined, on the Indian lands of a federally recognized Indian tribe after receiving an order of exclusion from the designated agency of the tribal government, as defined. The bill would require the tribe, if the order of exclusion pertains to a labor organization or its representatives or eligible employees engaged in otherwise lawful labor activity, to first obtain a decision from the Tribal Labor Panel established by the tribal labor relations ordinance stating that the order of exclusion does not conflict with the tribal labor relations ordinance adopted by the tribe or with a labor contract that is subject to the authority of the Tribal Labor Panel and applicable to the gaming facility. The bill would authorize a tribe to enter into an agreement with a law enforcement agency to enforce an order of exclusion, as specified. Because this bill would expand the scope of an existing crime, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors SB 1160?
SB 1160 is sponsored by Hueso.
What is the current status of SB 1160?
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 1160?
Track SB 1160 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1160

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 1160

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →