California 2017-2018 Regular Session Status: Enacted

SB 33 — Arbitration agreements.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 480, Statutes of 2017.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 05, 2016. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 78% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 5 sponsors

    1 primary, 4 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 1 recorded vote so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law requires a court, on petition of a party to an arbitration agreement alleging (1) the existence of a written agreement to arbitrate a controversy and (2) that a party to the agreement refuses to arbitrate the controversy, to order the petitioner and the respondent to arbitrate the controversy if the court determines that an agreement to arbitrate exists, unless the court makes other determinations. This bill would add to these determinations instances in which a state or federally chartered depository institution is seeking to apply a written agreement to arbitrate, contained in a contract consented to by a respondent consumer, to a purported contractual relationship with that consumer that was created by the petitioner fraudulently without the consumer's consent and by unlawfully using the consumer's personal identifying information, as defined.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 480, Statutes of 2017.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.

  4. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 25. Noes 13. Page 2524.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  5. In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  6. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 46. Noes 23. Page 2955.) Ordered to the Senate.

  7. Ordered to third reading.

  8. Read third time and amended.

  9. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  10. Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  11. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 8. Noes 3.) (June 27).

  12. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  13. Referred to Com. on JUD.

  14. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  15. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 26. Noes 13. Page 1254.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  16. Published May 16 at 9 p.m.

  17. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  18. Ordered to second reading.

  19. Read third time and amended.

  20. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  21. Ordered to second reading.

  22. Withdrawn from committee.

  23. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  24. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 945.) (May 2).

  25. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  26. Set for hearing May 2.

  27. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  28. Referred to Coms. on JUD. and APPR.

  29. From printer. May be acted upon on or after January 5.

  30. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Chiu · Cosponsor
  • Dababneh · Cosponsor
  • Dodd · Primary
  • Hertzberg · Cosponsor
  • Wieckowski · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 117 not signed on · 4 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Dodd

Co-sponsors (4)

  • Chiu
  • Dababneh
  • Hertzberg
  • Wieckowski

Not signed on (117)

117 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 117 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Unfinished Business SB33 Dodd et al. Concurrence

Passed 25 Yea · 13 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 211202
Democratic 4100
Total 251302
% of votes cast 63%33%0%5%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Nay
Bradford — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Pan — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Allen — Yea
De León — Yea
Hill — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Beall — Yea
Lara — Yea
Cannella — Nay
Glazer — Yea
Hernandez — Not Voting
Hertzberg — Yea
Bates — Nay
Monning — Yea
Moorlach — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Newman — Not Voting
Nielsen — Nay
Roth — Yea
Vidak — Nay
Wilk — Nay
Fuller — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Mark Stone — Nay
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Nay
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

finance civil-rights
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 33 do?
Existing law requires a court, on petition of a party to an arbitration agreement alleging (1) the existence of a written agreement to arbitrate a controversy and (2) that a party to the agreement refuses to arbitrate the controversy, to order the petitioner and the respondent to arbitrate the controversy if the court determines that an agreement to arbitrate exists, unless the court makes other determinations. This bill would add to these determinations instances in which a state or federally chartered depository institution is seeking to apply a written agreement to arbitrate, contained in a contract consented to by a respondent consumer, to a purported contractual relationship with that consumer that was created by the petitioner fraudulently without the consumer's consent and by unlawfully using the consumer's personal identifying information, as defined.
Who sponsors SB 33?
SB 33 is sponsored by Chiu, Dababneh, Dodd, Hertzberg, and Wieckowski.
What is the current status of SB 33?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 05, 2016. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 33?
Track SB 33 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 33

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 33

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →