AB 429 — Public contracts: preferences: forest products.
Last action — Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law generally requires state agencies to comply with competitive bidding procedures in soliciting and evaluating bids for public works projects. Existing law authorizes bidding preferences for certain categories of business owners. Existing law also requires the Department of General Services, in consultation with the California Environmental Protection Agency, members of the public, industry, and public health and environmental organizations, to provide state agencies with information and assistance regarding environmentally preferable purchasing. The Z'berg-Nejedly Forest Practice Act of 1973 prohibits a person from conducting timber operations on timberland unless a timber harvesting plan has been prepared by a registered professional forester and has been submitted to the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection and approved by the Director of Forestry and Fire Protection or the State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection. The California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 designates the State Air Resources Board as the state agency charged with monitoring and regulating sources of emissions of greenhouse gases and requires the board to adopt a statewide greenhouse gas emissions limit equivalent to the statewide greenhouse gas emissions level in 1990 to be achieved by 2020. Under existing law, the board is required to consult with other states, the federal government, and other nations to identify the most effective strategies and methods to, among other things, reduce greenhouse gases and imposes limitations on any link, as defined, between the state and another state, province, or country for purposes of a market-based compliance mechanism, as specified. This bill would require a state agency, as specified, that contracts for, or acquires, lumber or other solid wood products, excluding paper and other types of secondary manufactured goods, to give preference, to the extent consistent with federal law, if price, fitness, and quality are equal, based upon verifiable, self-certification from the supplier, to lumber and other solid wood products that are harvested in compliance with the Z'berg-Nejedly Forest Practice Act of 1973, rules governing federal timber sales, or a forest certification program identified by the Director of the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, as prescribed. The bill would authorize the Director of the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection to identify, after consideration at a public hearing, a forest certification program or programs that may be used for the purpose of purchasing preferences for lumber and solid wood products. The bill would require the Director of the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection to notify the Department of General Services of this identification in writing.
Bill Text
- Enrolled 09/08/15 - Enrolled Current pdf September 08, 2015
- Amended 08/31/15 - Amended Senate pdf August 31, 2015
- Amended 06/29/15 - Amended Senate pdf June 29, 2015
- Amended 04/08/15 - Amended Assembly pdf April 08, 2015
- Introduced 02/19/15 - Introduced pdf February 19, 2015
- AB429 View text html
Action History
-
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
-
Vetoed by Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 2868.).
-
Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Page 2859.)
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 4 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 2403.).
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 27).
-
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (July 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 1379.)
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
From Consent Calendar.
-
Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (April 29).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 15). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Re-referred to Com. on A. & A.R.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on A. & A.R. Read second time and amended.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Referred to Com. on A. & A.R.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Dahle · Primary
- Wood · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Dahle
Co-sponsors (1)
- Wood
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 69 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 78 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Not Voting |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 33 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 36 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 0% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Not Voting |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Not Voting |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Not Voting |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 56% | 0% | 0% | 44% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Not Voting |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Not Voting |
| Allen | — | Not Voting |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Not Voting |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 68 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 78 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Not Voting |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 429 do?
- Existing law generally requires state agencies to comply with competitive bidding procedures in soliciting and evaluating bids for public works projects. Existing law authorizes bidding preferences for certain categories of business owners. Existing law also requires the Department of General Services, in consultation with the California Environmental Protection Agency, members of the public, industry, and public health and environmental organizations, to provide state agencies with information and assistance regarding environmentally preferable purchasing. The Z'berg-Nejedly Forest Practice Act of 1973 prohibits a person from conducting timber operations on timberland unless a timber harvesting plan has been prepared by a registered professional forester and has been submitted to the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection and approved by the Director of Forestry and Fire Protection or the State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection. The California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 designates the State Air Resources Board as the state agency charged with monitoring and regulating sources of emissions of greenhouse gases and requires the board to adopt a statewide greenhouse gas emissions limit equivalent to the statewide greenhouse gas emissions level in 1990 to be achieved by 2020. Under existing law, the board is required to consult with other states, the federal government, and other nations to identify the most effective strategies and methods to, among other things, reduce greenhouse gases and imposes limitations on any link, as defined, between the state and another state, province, or country for purposes of a market-based compliance mechanism, as specified. This bill would require a state agency, as specified, that contracts for, or acquires, lumber or other solid wood products, excluding paper and other types of secondary manufactured goods, to give preference, to the extent consistent with federal law, if price, fitness, and quality are equal, based upon verifiable, self-certification from the supplier, to lumber and other solid wood products that are harvested in compliance with the Z'berg-Nejedly Forest Practice Act of 1973, rules governing federal timber sales, or a forest certification program identified by the Director of the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, as prescribed. The bill would authorize the Director of the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection to identify, after consideration at a public hearing, a forest certification program or programs that may be used for the purpose of purchasing preferences for lumber and solid wood products. The bill would require the Director of the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection to notify the Department of General Services of this identification in writing.
- Who sponsors AB 429?
- AB 429 is sponsored by Dahle and Wood.
- What is the current status of AB 429?
- This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 429?
- Track AB 429 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 429
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 429
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →