SB 1340 — Water Conservation in Landscaping Act.
Last action — In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law, the Water Conservation in Landscaping Act, requires the Department of Water Resources to update a specified model water efficient landscape ordinance by regulation and prescribes various requirements for the updated model ordinance. Existing law requires each local agency to adopt either the updated model water efficient landscape ordinance or an ordinance that is at least as effective in conserving water as the updated model ordinance. If the local agency does not make a selection, the model ordinance shall apply within the jurisdiction of the local agency. This bill, on or after July 1, 2018, would require a local agency to require a permit for the installation of specified automatic irrigation systems, or the expansion of the same specified automatic irrigation systems to increase the irrigated area by 25% or more, for a landscape project. The bill would allow the governing body of a local agency to adopt an ordinance prescribing fees for filing an application for the permit, subject to the restrictions that the fees not exceed the amount reasonably required to review applications and issue the permits and that the fees not be levied for general revenue purposes. The bill would authorize a property owner, property manager, landscape contractor, landscape architect, or any other agent designated by the property owner to submit the application for a permit required pursuant to these provisions for an irrigation system serving a residential landscape. The bill would exempt from these requirements the repair and replacement of the components or parts of an automatic irrigation system. By adding to the duties of local agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Enrolled 08/26/16 - Enrolled Current pdf August 26, 2016
- Amended 06/21/16 - Amended Assembly pdf June 21, 2016
- Amended 06/08/16 - Amended Assembly pdf June 08, 2016
- Amended 04/05/16 - Amended Senate pdf April 05, 2016
- Introduced 02/19/16 - Introduced pdf February 19, 2016
- SB1340 View text html
Action History
-
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
-
Vetoed by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 1:30 p.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 25. Noes 14. Page 5364.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 47. Noes 31. Page 5913.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 14. Noes 5.) (August 10).
-
August 3 hearing postponed by committee.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 3.) (June 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 9. Noes 5.) (June 28). Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
-
Assembly Rule 56 suspended. (Page 5473.)
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on W., P., & W.
-
June 14 set for first hearing. Failed passage in committee. (Ayes 6. Noes 8.) Reconsideration granted.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on W., P., & W.
-
Referred to Coms. on W., P., & W. and L. GOV.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 21. Noes 12. Page 3873.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 2. Page 3496.) (April 12).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
-
Set for hearing April 12.
-
Referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 23.
-
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Wolk · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 13 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Wolk
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 23 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 25 | 14 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 64% | 36% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Nay |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Nay |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 43 | 25 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 47 | 31 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 59% | 39% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Baker | — | Nay |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Nay |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Mayes | — | Nay |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Nay |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Nay |
| Gray | — | Nay |
| Gatto | — | Nay |
| Chang | — | Nay |
| Linder | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| O'Donnell | — | Not Voting |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Hadley | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Not Voting |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Nay |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 14 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 70% | 25% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (20)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Not Voting |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 56% | 33% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Not Voting |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 33% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Mathis | — | Not Voting |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Nay |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 7 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 8 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 40% | 53% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Not Voting |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Nay |
| Gomez | — | Nay |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Nay |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 0% | 0% | 40% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Mathis | — | Not Voting |
| Williams | — | Not Voting |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Not Voting |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Not Voting |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Not Voting |
| Olsen | — | Not Voting |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 19 | 11 | 0 | 7 |
| Democratic | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 21 | 12 | 0 | 7 |
| % of votes cast | 53% | 30% | 0% | 18% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Nay |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Not Voting |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Hall | — | Not Voting |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Not Voting |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Not Voting |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Not Voting |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Not Voting |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 78% | 22% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1340 do?
- Existing law, the Water Conservation in Landscaping Act, requires the Department of Water Resources to update a specified model water efficient landscape ordinance by regulation and prescribes various requirements for the updated model ordinance. Existing law requires each local agency to adopt either the updated model water efficient landscape ordinance or an ordinance that is at least as effective in conserving water as the updated model ordinance. If the local agency does not make a selection, the model ordinance shall apply within the jurisdiction of the local agency. This bill, on or after July 1, 2018, would require a local agency to require a permit for the installation of specified automatic irrigation systems, or the expansion of the same specified automatic irrigation systems to increase the irrigated area by 25% or more, for a landscape project. The bill would allow the governing body of a local agency to adopt an ordinance prescribing fees for filing an application for the permit, subject to the restrictions that the fees not exceed the amount reasonably required to review applications and issue the permits and that the fees not be levied for general revenue purposes. The bill would authorize a property owner, property manager, landscape contractor, landscape architect, or any other agent designated by the property owner to submit the application for a permit required pursuant to these provisions for an irrigation system serving a residential landscape. The bill would exempt from these requirements the repair and replacement of the components or parts of an automatic irrigation system. By adding to the duties of local agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors SB 1340?
- SB 1340 is sponsored by Wolk.
- What is the current status of SB 1340?
- This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1340?
- Track SB 1340 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1340
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1340
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →