California 2015-2016 Regular Session Status: Enacted

SB 696 — Insurance: principle-based valuation.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 658, Statutes of 2015.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 27, 2015. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 10 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law governs the issuance of life and disability insurance and authorizes the Insurance Commissioner to regulate those insurers. Existing law requires every life and disability insurer doing business in this state to annually submit the opinion of a qualified actuary as to whether the reserves and related actuarial items held in support of the policies and contracts specified by the commissioner by regulation are computed appropriately, are based on assumptions that satisfy contractual provisions, are consistent with prior reported amounts, and comply with applicable state law. Among other things, existing law requires insurers to calculate the minimum standard for the valuation of those policies and contracts using specified mortality tables approved by the commissioner, sets forth the applicable interest rates, and establishes the reserve requirements for various types of life and disability policies and contracts. This bill would explicitly refer to the body of laws imposing those requirements, as specified, as the Standard Valuation Law. The bill would require the commissioner and companies engaging in specified activities relating to the business of life insurance to incorporate the methodology employed by a specified manual of valuation instructions adopted by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners in making determinations relating to reserve requirements and the minimum standard of valuation for policies and contracts, as specified. The bill would require a company to establish reserves using a principle-based valuation that meets specified conditions in the valuation manual, including quantifying the benefits, guarantees, and funding associated with the contracts, and would require the company to develop and file with the commissioner, upon request, a principle-based valuation report. The bill would require a company to submit mortality, morbidity, policyholder behavior, or expense experience and other data as prescribed in the valuation manual. This bill would authorize the commissioner to impose an annual assessment on each insurance company, based on the company's gross annual life insurance premium written by the insurer in California during the immediately preceding year, thereby imposing a tax. The bill would exempt certain information submitted by a company to the commissioner from disclosure pursuant to the California Public Records Act and would provide that it is not subject to subpoena or discovery or admissible in evidence in any private civil action. The bill would also authorize the commissioner to hire and assign Department of Insurance staff, and retain nondepartmental actuaries and other consultants, to assist the commissioner in implementing principle-based valuation. This bill would provide that the valuation manual would not be operative until the commissioner certifies that adequate funding has been appropriated by the Legislature, and all other necessary resources, including, but not limited to, adequate staff, are available and sufficient to enable the commissioner to carry out the duties required by specified provisions of the bill. The bill would require the commissioner to make that certification by submitting a letter to the Chairs of the Assembly Committee on Insurance and the Senate Committee on Insurance stating that the funding and other necessary resources are available and sufficient to carry out those duties. The bill would also require the commissioner to post a notice on the department's Internet Web site immediately after submitting that certification letter stating that the certification letter has been submitted and that the provisions of the valuation manual are in effect. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. This bill would include a change in state statute that would result in a taxpayer paying a higher tax within the meaning of Section 3 of Article XIIIA of the California Constitution, and thus would require for passage the approval of 23 of the membership of each house of the Legislature.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 658, Statutes of 2015.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 9:30 a.m.

  4. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 2670.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  5. In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  6. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 2962.) Ordered to the Senate.

  7. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  8. Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  9. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 27).

  10. August 19 set for first hearing. Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  11. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  12. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (July 14).

  13. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (July 8). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  14. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on INS.

  15. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on INS.

  16. Referred to Coms. on INS. and JUD.

  17. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  18. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 38. Noes 1. Page 1210.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  19. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  20. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 1159.) (May 28).

  21. Set for hearing May 28.

  22. May 18 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  23. Set for hearing May 18.

  24. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  25. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 820.) (April 28).

  26. Set for hearing April 28.

  27. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 727.) (April 22). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  28. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on INS.

  29. Set for hearing April 22.

  30. Referred to Coms. on INS. and JUD.

  31. Read first time.

  32. From printer. May be acted upon on or after April 1.

  33. Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Roth · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Roth

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 39 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 36001
Democratic 3000
Total 39001
% of votes cast 98%0%0%3%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Yea
Block — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huff — Yea
Lara — Yea
Liu — Yea
Pan — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Allen — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
De León — Yea
Leno — Yea
Runner — Yea
Hall — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Moorlach — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Roth — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Hueso — Not Voting
Bates — Yea
Beall — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 78 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 69002
Democratic 4000
Republican 5000
Total 78002
% of votes cast 98%0%0%3%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Yea
Brown — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Levine — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Mathis — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Perea — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Steinorth — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Eggman — Not Voting
Cooper — Yea
Daly — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Salas — Yea
Mayes — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Burke — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Harper — Yea
Campos — Yea
Holden — Yea
Kim — Yea
Gray — Yea
Linder — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Chang — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Low — Yea
Lopez — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Medina — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Baker — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Chau — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Chu — Yea
Chávez — Not Voting
Cooley — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Ting — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Weber — Yea
Williams — Yea
Wood — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Hadley — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
Travis Allen — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 17 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 13000
Democratic 2000
Republican 2000
Total 17000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Bigelow — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Holden — Yea
Chang — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Weber — Yea
Wood — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 13 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 11000
Democratic 1000
Republican 1000
Total 13000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Rodriguez — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Mayes — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Daly — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Travis Allen — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea

Official roll call →

3rd Reading

Passed 38 Yea · 1 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 36001
Democratic 2100
Total 38101
% of votes cast 95%3%0%3%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Yea
Lara — Yea
Liu — Yea
Monning — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Pan — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Hill — Yea
Leno — Yea
Allen — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
De León — Yea
Runner — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Hueso — Not Voting
Bates — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Huff — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Moorlach — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Roth — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Hall — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass

Passed 6 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6001
Total 6001
% of votes cast 86%0%0%14%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Bates — Not Voting
Mendoza — Yea
Hill — Yea
Beall — Yea
Lara — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Nielsen — Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 7000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Bates — Yea
Hill — Yea
Lara — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Beall — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Mendoza — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 696 do?
Existing law governs the issuance of life and disability insurance and authorizes the Insurance Commissioner to regulate those insurers. Existing law requires every life and disability insurer doing business in this state to annually submit the opinion of a qualified actuary as to whether the reserves and related actuarial items held in support of the policies and contracts specified by the commissioner by regulation are computed appropriately, are based on assumptions that satisfy contractual provisions, are consistent with prior reported amounts, and comply with applicable state law. Among other things, existing law requires insurers to calculate the minimum standard for the valuation of those policies and contracts using specified mortality tables approved by the commissioner, sets forth the applicable interest rates, and establishes the reserve requirements for various types of life and disability policies and contracts. This bill would explicitly refer to the body of laws imposing those requirements, as specified, as the Standard Valuation Law. The bill would require the commissioner and companies engaging in specified activities relating to the business of life insurance to incorporate the methodology employed by a specified manual of valuation instructions adopted by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners in making determinations relating to reserve requirements and the minimum standard of valuation for policies and contracts, as specified. The bill would require a company to establish reserves using a principle-based valuation that meets specified conditions in the valuation manual, including quantifying the benefits, guarantees, and funding associated with the contracts, and would require the company to develop and file with the commissioner, upon request, a principle-based valuation report. The bill would require a company to submit mortality, morbidity, policyholder behavior, or expense experience and other data as prescribed in the valuation manual. This bill would authorize the commissioner to impose an annual assessment on each insurance company, based on the company's gross annual life insurance premium written by the insurer in California during the immediately preceding year, thereby imposing a tax. The bill would exempt certain information submitted by a company to the commissioner from disclosure pursuant to the California Public Records Act and would provide that it is not subject to subpoena or discovery or admissible in evidence in any private civil action. The bill would also authorize the commissioner to hire and assign Department of Insurance staff, and retain nondepartmental actuaries and other consultants, to assist the commissioner in implementing principle-based valuation. This bill would provide that the valuation manual would not be operative until the commissioner certifies that adequate funding has been appropriated by the Legislature, and all other necessary resources, including, but not limited to, adequate staff, are available and sufficient to enable the commissioner to carry out the duties required by specified provisions of the bill. The bill would require the commissioner to make that certification by submitting a letter to the Chairs of the Assembly Committee on Insurance and the Senate Committee on Insurance stating that the funding and other necessary resources are available and sufficient to carry out those duties. The bill would also require the commissioner to post a notice on the department's Internet Web site immediately after submitting that certification letter stating that the certification letter has been submitted and that the provisions of the valuation manual are in effect. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. This bill would include a change in state statute that would result in a taxpayer paying a higher tax within the meaning of Section 3 of Article XIIIA of the California Constitution, and thus would require for passage the approval of 23 of the membership of each house of the Legislature.
Who sponsors SB 696?
SB 696 is sponsored by Roth.
What is the current status of SB 696?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 27, 2015. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 696?
Track SB 696 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 696

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 696

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →