SB 551 — State water policy: water and energy efficiency.
Last action — August 27 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
The California Constitution requires the reasonable and beneficial use of water. Existing law establishes various state water policies, including the policy that the water resources of the state be put to beneficial use to the fullest extent of which they are capable. Existing law, the Warren-Alquist State Energy Resources Conservation Development Act, declares, among other things, that electrical and natural gas utilities should have as a principal goal of their resource planning and investment to minimize the cost to society of reliable energy services, improve the environment, and encourage the diversity of energy sources. The act also declares that those utilities should seek to exploit all practicable and cost-effective conservation and improvements in the efficiency of energy use and distribution that offer equivalent or better system of reliability. This bill would declare the policy of the state that water use and water treatment shall operate in a manner that is as energy efficient as is feasible and energy use and generation shall operate in a manner that is as water efficient as is feasible. This bill would require all relevant state agencies to consider this state policy when revising, adopting, or establishing policies, regulations, and grant criteria when pertinent to these uses of water and energy.
Bill Text
- Amended 07/06/15 - Amended Assembly Current pdf July 06, 2015
- Introduced 02/26/15 - Introduced pdf February 26, 2015
- SB551 View text html
Action History
-
August 27 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
-
August 19 set for first hearing. Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 4.) (July 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on W., P., & W.
-
Referred to Com. on W., P., & W.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 27. Noes 9. Page 1205.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 1156.) (May 28).
-
Set for hearing May 28.
-
May 11 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
Set for hearing May 11.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 821.) (April 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing April 28.
-
Re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
-
Referred to Com. on RLS.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 29.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Wolk · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Wolk
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 27% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Not Voting |
| Bigelow | — | Not Voting |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 24 | 9 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 27 | 9 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 68% | 23% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Galgiani | — | Not Voting |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Cannella | — | Not Voting |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Not Voting |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 551 do?
- The California Constitution requires the reasonable and beneficial use of water. Existing law establishes various state water policies, including the policy that the water resources of the state be put to beneficial use to the fullest extent of which they are capable. Existing law, the Warren-Alquist State Energy Resources Conservation Development Act, declares, among other things, that electrical and natural gas utilities should have as a principal goal of their resource planning and investment to minimize the cost to society of reliable energy services, improve the environment, and encourage the diversity of energy sources. The act also declares that those utilities should seek to exploit all practicable and cost-effective conservation and improvements in the efficiency of energy use and distribution that offer equivalent or better system of reliability. This bill would declare the policy of the state that water use and water treatment shall operate in a manner that is as energy efficient as is feasible and energy use and generation shall operate in a manner that is as water efficient as is feasible. This bill would require all relevant state agencies to consider this state policy when revising, adopting, or establishing policies, regulations, and grant criteria when pertinent to these uses of water and energy.
- Who sponsors SB 551?
- SB 551 is sponsored by Wolk.
- What is the current status of SB 551?
- This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 551?
- Track SB 551 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 551
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 551
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →