SB 406 — Employment: leave.
Last action — Last day to consider Governors veto pursuant to Joint Rule 58.5.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
The Moore-Brown-Roberti Family Rights Act makes it an unlawful employment practice for an employer to refuse to grant a request by an eligible employee to take up to 12 workweeks of unpaid protected leave during any 12-month period (1) to bond with a child who was born to, adopted by, or placed for foster care with, the employee, (2) to care for the employee's parent, spouse, or child who has a serious health condition, as defined, or (3) because the employee is suffering from a serious health condition rendering him or her unable to perform the functions of the job. The act provides that if the same employer employs both parents entitled to leave under the act, the employer is not required to grant leave in connection with the birth, adoption, or foster care of a child that would allow the parents family care and medical leave totaling more than the amount specified in the act. The act defines "child" to mean a biological, adopted, or foster child, a stepchild, a legal ward, or a child of a person standing in loco parentis who is either under 18 years of age or an adult dependent child. The act defines "family care and medical leave" to mean, among other things, leave for reason of the serious health condition of a child, and leave to care for a parent or a spouse who has a serious health condition. The act defines "parent" to mean a biological, foster, or adoptive parent, a stepparent, a legal guardian, or other person who stood in loco parentis to the employee when the employee was a child. This bill would make various changes to the definitions described above, thereby expanding the persons and purposes for which leave is required to be provided under the act. The bill would redefine the term "child" to include a biological, adopted, or foster son or daughter, a stepchild, a legal ward, a son or daughter of a domestic partner, or a person to whom the employee stands in loco parentis, and would remove the restriction on age or dependent status. The bill would expand the definition of leave with regard to caring for persons with a serious health condition to also include leave to care for a grandparent, grandchild, sibling, or domestic partner who has a serious health condition. The bill would include a parent-in-law in the definition of "parent."
Bill Text
- Enrolled 09/16/15 - Enrolled Current pdf September 16, 2015
- Amended 09/04/15 - Amended Assembly pdf September 04, 2015
- Amended 09/02/15 - Amended Assembly pdf September 02, 2015
- Amended 06/01/15 - Amended Senate pdf June 01, 2015
- Amended 04/23/15 - Amended Senate pdf April 23, 2015
- Introduced 02/25/15 - Introduced pdf February 25, 2015
- SB406 View text html
Action History
-
Last day to consider Governors veto pursuant to Joint Rule 58.5.
-
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
-
Vetoed by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4:45 p.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 23. Noes 16. Page 2775.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 41. Noes 30. Page 3186.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (August 27).
-
August 19 set for first hearing. Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (June 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on L. & E.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 23. Noes 16. Page 1327.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Ordered to second reading.
-
Read third time and amended.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 1153.) (May 28).
-
Set for hearing May 28.
-
May 11 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
Set for hearing May 11.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 1. Page 728.) (April 22).
-
Set for hearing April 22.
-
Referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 28.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Gomez · Cosponsor
- Jackson · Primary
- Lena A. Gonzalez · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 119 not signed on · 12 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Jackson
Co-sponsors (2)
- Gomez
- Gonzalez, Lena A. Democratic
Not signed on (119)
119 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 119 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 21 | 15 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 23 | 16 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 58% | 40% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Roth | — | Nay |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Nay |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Mitchell | — | Not Voting |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Glazer | — | Nay |
| Moorlach | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 37 | 25 | 0 | 9 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 41 | 30 | 0 | 9 |
| % of votes cast | 51% | 38% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Not Voting |
| Quirk | — | Not Voting |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Wood | — | Not Voting |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Nay |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Kim | — | Nay |
| Chang | — | Nay |
| Linder | — | Nay |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Cooley | — | Nay |
| Cooper | — | Not Voting |
| Daly | — | Not Voting |
| Dodd | — | Nay |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Mayes | — | Nay |
| Medina | — | Nay |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| O'Donnell | — | Not Voting |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Not Voting |
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Baker | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Steinorth | — | Nay |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Not Voting |
| Hadley | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Nay |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Low | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 21 | 15 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 23 | 16 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 58% | 40% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Nay |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Glazer | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Not Voting |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Roth | — | Nay |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 20% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 406 do?
- The Moore-Brown-Roberti Family Rights Act makes it an unlawful employment practice for an employer to refuse to grant a request by an eligible employee to take up to 12 workweeks of unpaid protected leave during any 12-month period (1) to bond with a child who was born to, adopted by, or placed for foster care with, the employee, (2) to care for the employee's parent, spouse, or child who has a serious health condition, as defined, or (3) because the employee is suffering from a serious health condition rendering him or her unable to perform the functions of the job. The act provides that if the same employer employs both parents entitled to leave under the act, the employer is not required to grant leave in connection with the birth, adoption, or foster care of a child that would allow the parents family care and medical leave totaling more than the amount specified in the act. The act defines "child" to mean a biological, adopted, or foster child, a stepchild, a legal ward, or a child of a person standing in loco parentis who is either under 18 years of age or an adult dependent child. The act defines "family care and medical leave" to mean, among other things, leave for reason of the serious health condition of a child, and leave to care for a parent or a spouse who has a serious health condition. The act defines "parent" to mean a biological, foster, or adoptive parent, a stepparent, a legal guardian, or other person who stood in loco parentis to the employee when the employee was a child. This bill would make various changes to the definitions described above, thereby expanding the persons and purposes for which leave is required to be provided under the act. The bill would redefine the term "child" to include a biological, adopted, or foster son or daughter, a stepchild, a legal ward, a son or daughter of a domestic partner, or a person to whom the employee stands in loco parentis, and would remove the restriction on age or dependent status. The bill would expand the definition of leave with regard to caring for persons with a serious health condition to also include leave to care for a grandparent, grandchild, sibling, or domestic partner who has a serious health condition. The bill would include a parent-in-law in the definition of "parent."
- Who sponsors SB 406?
- SB 406 is sponsored by Gomez, Jackson, and Gonzalez, Lena A. (Democratic).
- What is the current status of SB 406?
- This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 406?
- Track SB 406 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 406
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 406
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →