AB 1957 — Public records: body-worn cameras.
Last action — Stricken from file.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
The California Public Records Act requires that public records be open to inspection at all times during the office hours of a state or local agency and that every person has a right to inspect any public record, except as specifically provided. The act further requires that a reasonably segregable portion of a public record be available for inspection by any person requesting the public record after deletion of the portions that are exempted by law. Existing law exempts from the disclosure requirements records of complaints to, or investigations conducted by, or records of intelligence information or security procedures of, law enforcement agencies, including the Attorney General and state or local police agencies. This bill would authorize the governing board of a law enforcement agency, in closed session, to review the footage from a body-worn camera when a peace officer who was wearing the camera is involved in, or was a witness to, an incident that results in great bodily injury to, or death of, a person other than the peace officer. The bill would require, if there is an investigation into an allegation of misconduct by the peace officer, and the investigation leads to criminal prosecution of the peace officer within 60 days after the commencement of the investigation, the judge to determine the protocol for release of the footage from a body-worn camera. The bill would require, if there is no investigation into an allegation of misconduct by the peace officer, or if there is an investigation, but the investigation does not lead to criminal prosecution of the peace officer within 60 days of the commencement of the investigation, the state or local law enforcement agency employing the peace officer to make available, upon request, footage from a body-worn camera 60 days after the commencement of the investigation. The bill would also prohibit the public release, as specified, of footage that relates to crimes of domestic violence, crimes that include minors, or that includes statements of a witness at the scene of a crime, subject to a specified exception. By increasing the duties of local law enforcement, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. The California Constitution requires local agencies, for the purpose of ensuring public access to the meetings of public bodies and the writings of public officials and agencies, to comply with a statutory enactment that amends or enacts laws relating to public records or open meetings and contains findings demonstrating that the enactment furthers the constitutional requirements relating to this purpose. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.
Bill Text
- Amended 05/18/16 - Amended Assembly Current pdf May 18, 2016
- Amended 04/25/16 - Amended Assembly pdf April 25, 2016
- Amended 04/14/16 - Amended Assembly pdf April 14, 2016
- Amended 04/06/16 - Amended Assembly pdf April 06, 2016
- Amended 03/17/16 - Amended Assembly pdf March 17, 2016
- Introduced 02/12/16 - Introduced pdf February 12, 2016
- AB1957 View text html
Action History
-
Stricken from file.
-
Motion to reconsider made by Assembly Member Quirk.
-
Read third time. Refused passage. (Ayes 28. Noes 36. Page 5146.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 7.) (May 25).
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 2.) (April 19).
-
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (April 12).
-
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and JUD.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 17.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Quirk · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 11 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Quirk
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 26 | 29 | 0 | 15 |
| Democratic | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 28 | 36 | 0 | 16 |
| % of votes cast | 35% | 45% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Not Voting |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Medina | — | Nay |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Not Voting |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Not Voting |
| Campos | — | Not Voting |
| Eggman | — | Not Voting |
| Dababneh | — | Nay |
| Daly | — | Nay |
| Bonilla | — | Not Voting |
| Frazier | — | Not Voting |
| Low | — | Not Voting |
| Mullin | — | Not Voting |
| Chu | — | Not Voting |
| Dodd | — | Not Voting |
| Rodriguez | — | Not Voting |
| Gatto | — | Nay |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Nay |
| Salas | — | Nay |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Nay |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Gray | — | Nay |
| Mayes | — | Nay |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Chang | — | Nay |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Nay |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Nay |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Not Voting |
| Hadley | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Not Voting |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Nay |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Nay |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 65% | 35% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (20)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Nay |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Nay |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 20% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 57% | 14% | 0% | 29% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Not Voting |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1957 do?
- The California Public Records Act requires that public records be open to inspection at all times during the office hours of a state or local agency and that every person has a right to inspect any public record, except as specifically provided. The act further requires that a reasonably segregable portion of a public record be available for inspection by any person requesting the public record after deletion of the portions that are exempted by law. Existing law exempts from the disclosure requirements records of complaints to, or investigations conducted by, or records of intelligence information or security procedures of, law enforcement agencies, including the Attorney General and state or local police agencies. This bill would authorize the governing board of a law enforcement agency, in closed session, to review the footage from a body-worn camera when a peace officer who was wearing the camera is involved in, or was a witness to, an incident that results in great bodily injury to, or death of, a person other than the peace officer. The bill would require, if there is an investigation into an allegation of misconduct by the peace officer, and the investigation leads to criminal prosecution of the peace officer within 60 days after the commencement of the investigation, the judge to determine the protocol for release of the footage from a body-worn camera. The bill would require, if there is no investigation into an allegation of misconduct by the peace officer, or if there is an investigation, but the investigation does not lead to criminal prosecution of the peace officer within 60 days of the commencement of the investigation, the state or local law enforcement agency employing the peace officer to make available, upon request, footage from a body-worn camera 60 days after the commencement of the investigation. The bill would also prohibit the public release, as specified, of footage that relates to crimes of domestic violence, crimes that include minors, or that includes statements of a witness at the scene of a crime, subject to a specified exception. By increasing the duties of local law enforcement, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. The California Constitution requires local agencies, for the purpose of ensuring public access to the meetings of public bodies and the writings of public officials and agencies, to comply with a statutory enactment that amends or enacts laws relating to public records or open meetings and contains findings demonstrating that the enactment furthers the constitutional requirements relating to this purpose. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.
- Who sponsors AB 1957?
- AB 1957 is sponsored by Quirk.
- What is the current status of AB 1957?
- This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1957?
- Track AB 1957 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1957
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1957
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →