Pipeline safety: inspections.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 295 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 295.
You're tracking SB 295
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 295 — Pipeline safety: inspections.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 607, Statutes of 2015.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 23, 2015. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 10 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Under the Elder California Pipeline Safety Act of 1981, the State Fire Marshal exercises safety regulatory jurisdiction over intrastate pipelines used for the transportation of hazardous or highly volatile liquid substances. The act authorizes the State Fire Marshal to exercise safety regulatory jurisdiction over portions of interstate pipelines located within the state and subject to an agreement between the United States Secretary of Transportation and the State Fire Marshal. The act authorizes the State Fire Marshal to enter, inspect, and examine, at reasonable times and in a reasonable manner, the records and properties of any pipeline operator that are required to be inspected and examined to determine whether the pipeline operator is in compliance with the act. This bill would require, commencing January 1, 2017, the State Fire Marshal, or an officer or employee authorized by the State Fire Marshal, to annually inspect all intrastate pipelines and operators of intrastate pipelines under the jurisdiction of the State Fire Marshal, and would require the State Fire Marshal to adopt regulations implementing this provision by that date. The bill would prohibit the State Fire Marshal from becoming an inspection agent for specified interstate pipelines unless all regulatory and enforcement authority over those pipelines is transferred to the State Fire Marshal from the federal Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration. The bill would require the State Fire Marshal to revise specified fees assessed to cover the costs associated with this measure.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/08/15 - Chaptered Current pdf October 08, 2015
- Enrolled 09/10/15 - Enrolled pdf September 10, 2015
- Amended 08/19/15 - Amended Assembly pdf August 19, 2015
- Amended 08/18/15 - Amended Assembly pdf August 18, 2015
- Amended 06/24/15 - Amended Assembly pdf June 24, 2015
- Introduced 02/23/15 - Introduced pdf February 23, 2015
- SB295 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 607, Statutes of 2015.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 10:45 p.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 27. Noes 9. Page 2683.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 10. Noes 1. Page 2488.)
-
Set for hearing September 3.
-
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on G.O. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d). (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 2390.) Re-referred to Com. on G.O.
-
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d).
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 73. Noes 1. Page 2724.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 1.) (August 27).
-
Joint Rule 62(a) suspended.
-
August 26 set for first hearing. Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
(Received at desk July 17 pursuant to JR 61(a)(10))
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 18. Noes 0.) (July 15).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on G.O. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (July 14). Re-referred to Com. on G.O.
-
Assembly Rule 56 suspended. (Page 2348.)
-
Joint Rule 62(a) suspended. (Page 2348.)
-
Re-referred to Coms. on E.S. & T.M. and G.O. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
-
From committee: Be re-referred to Coms. on G.O. and E.S. & T.M. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (July 2). Re-referred to Com. on G.O.
-
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
-
June 29 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 1074.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Ordered to special consent calendar.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 1033.) (May 18).
-
Set for hearing May 18.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 919.) (May 6). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing May 6.
-
April 29 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Set for hearing April 29.
-
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 26.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Jackson · Primary
- Williams · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 4 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Jackson
Co-sponsors (1)
- Williams
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 25 | 8 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 27 | 9 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 68% | 23% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Not Voting |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Not Voting |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Nay |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Not Voting |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 77% | 8% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Galgiani | — | Not Voting |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 65 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Republican | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 73 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 1% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Brough | — | Not Voting |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Not Voting |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Not Voting |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Not Voting |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Not Voting |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 6% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 17 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 18 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (21)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Not Voting |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Not Voting |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Not Voting |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 14% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 0% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 35 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 38 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Not Voting |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 295 do?
- Under the Elder California Pipeline Safety Act of 1981, the State Fire Marshal exercises safety regulatory jurisdiction over intrastate pipelines used for the transportation of hazardous or highly volatile liquid substances. The act authorizes the State Fire Marshal to exercise safety regulatory jurisdiction over portions of interstate pipelines located within the state and subject to an agreement between the United States Secretary of Transportation and the State Fire Marshal. The act authorizes the State Fire Marshal to enter, inspect, and examine, at reasonable times and in a reasonable manner, the records and properties of any pipeline operator that are required to be inspected and examined to determine whether the pipeline operator is in compliance with the act. This bill would require, commencing January 1, 2017, the State Fire Marshal, or an officer or employee authorized by the State Fire Marshal, to annually inspect all intrastate pipelines and operators of intrastate pipelines under the jurisdiction of the State Fire Marshal, and would require the State Fire Marshal to adopt regulations implementing this provision by that date. The bill would prohibit the State Fire Marshal from becoming an inspection agent for specified interstate pipelines unless all regulatory and enforcement authority over those pipelines is transferred to the State Fire Marshal from the federal Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration. The bill would require the State Fire Marshal to revise specified fees assessed to cover the costs associated with this measure.
- Who sponsors SB 295?
- SB 295 is sponsored by Jackson and Williams.
- What is the current status of SB 295?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 23, 2015. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 295?
- Track SB 295 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 295
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 295
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →