Hearsay: admissibility of statements.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 593 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 593.
You're tracking AB 593
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 593 — Hearsay: admissibility of statements.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 55, Statutes of 2015.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 24, 2015. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 4 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law, known as the "hearsay rule," provides that, at a hearing, evidence of a statement that was made other than by a witness while testifying at the hearing and that is offered to prove the truth of the matter stated is inadmissible. Existing law also provides exceptions to the hearsay rule to permit the admission of specified kinds of evidence. Existing law provides that evidence of a statement that is offered against a party who has engaged, or aided and abetted, in wrongdoing that was intended to, and did, procure the unavailability of the declarant as a witness is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule, as specified. Existing law would repeal this exception on January 1, 2016. This bill would delete the January 1, 2016, repeal date for these provisions, thereby extending the hearsay exemption into perpetuity.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 07/06/15 - Chaptered Current pdf July 06, 2015
- Enrolled 06/24/15 - Enrolled pdf June 24, 2015
- Introduced 02/24/15 - Introduced pdf February 24, 2015
- AB593 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 55, Statutes of 2015.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 11 a.m.
-
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 1550.).
-
Ordered to special consent calendar.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 9).
-
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 885.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 7).
-
Referred to Com. on JUD.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 27.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Levine · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Levine
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 34 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 37 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 93% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Not Voting |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Not Voting |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 69 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 79 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 99% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Not Voting |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 593 do?
- Existing law, known as the "hearsay rule," provides that, at a hearing, evidence of a statement that was made other than by a witness while testifying at the hearing and that is offered to prove the truth of the matter stated is inadmissible. Existing law also provides exceptions to the hearsay rule to permit the admission of specified kinds of evidence. Existing law provides that evidence of a statement that is offered against a party who has engaged, or aided and abetted, in wrongdoing that was intended to, and did, procure the unavailability of the declarant as a witness is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule, as specified. Existing law would repeal this exception on January 1, 2016. This bill would delete the January 1, 2016, repeal date for these provisions, thereby extending the hearsay exemption into perpetuity.
- Who sponsors AB 593?
- AB 593 is sponsored by Levine.
- What is the current status of AB 593?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 24, 2015. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 593?
- Track AB 593 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 593
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 593
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →