Sales and use taxes: exemptions: animals: drugs and medicines.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 688 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 688.
You're tracking SB 688
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 688 — Sales and use taxes: exemptions: animals: drugs and medicines.
Last action — Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing sales and use tax laws impose a tax on retailers measured by the gross receipts from the sale of tangible personal property sold at retail in this state, or on the storage, use, or other consumption in this state of tangible personal property purchased from a retailer for storage, use, or other consumption in this state, and provides various exemptions from those taxes. Existing sales and use tax laws, with certain exceptions, define a retailer as a seller who makes any retail sale of tangible personal property and as a person who makes more than 2 retail sales of tangible personal property during any 12-month period, and defines a retail sale as a sale of tangible personal property for any purpose other than resale in the regular course of business. Existing sales and use tax law provides that a licensed veterinarian is a consumer of, and not a retailer of, drugs and medicines used or furnished by the veterinarian in the performance of his or her professional services, so that the retail sale subject to tax is the sale of drugs and medicines to the licensed veterinarian. This bill would, until January 1, 2018, suspend the provision that a licensed veterinarian is a consumer of drugs and medicines used or furnished by the veterinarian in the performance of his or her professional services. This bill would, until January 1, 2018, exempt from sales and use taxes the gross receipts from the sale in this state of, and the storage, use, or other consumption in this state of, drugs and medicines used, furnished, or sold by a licensed veterinarian, a city, county, city and county, or other local government animal shelter, or a nonprofit animal welfare or rescue organization for the treatment of animals. This bill would require the Legislative Analyst's Office to, by January 1, 2017, with information provided by the State Board of Equalization, conduct and submit a study to the Senate Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review, the Assembly Committee on Budget, the Assembly Committee on Revenue and Taxation, and the Senate Committee on Governance and Finance. The Bradley-Burns Uniform Local Sales and Use Tax Law authorizes counties and cities to impose local sales and use taxes in conformity with the Sales and Use Tax Law, and existing law authorizes districts, as specified, to impose transactions and use taxes in accordance with the Transactions and Use Tax Law, which conforms to the Sales and Use Tax Law. Amendments to state sales and use taxes are incorporated into these laws. Section 2230 of the Revenue and Taxation Code provides that the state will reimburse counties and cities for revenue losses caused by the enactment of sales and use tax exemptions. This bill would provide that, notwithstanding Section 2230 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, no appropriation is made and the state shall not reimburse any local agencies for sales and use tax revenues lost by them pursuant to this bill. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy, but its operative date would depend on its effective date.
Bill Text
- Amended 05/14/13 - Amended Senate Current pdf May 14, 2013
- Amended 04/01/13 - Amended Senate pdf April 01, 2013
- Introduced 02/22/13 - Introduced pdf February 22, 2013
- SB688 View text html
Action History
-
Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
-
Held in committee and under submission.
-
Set for hearing May 23.
-
Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
Set for hearing May 20.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 882.) (May 8).
-
Set for hearing May 8.
-
Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 26.
-
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Galgiani · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Galgiani
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| De León | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Not Voting |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 688 do?
- Existing sales and use tax laws impose a tax on retailers measured by the gross receipts from the sale of tangible personal property sold at retail in this state, or on the storage, use, or other consumption in this state of tangible personal property purchased from a retailer for storage, use, or other consumption in this state, and provides various exemptions from those taxes. Existing sales and use tax laws, with certain exceptions, define a retailer as a seller who makes any retail sale of tangible personal property and as a person who makes more than 2 retail sales of tangible personal property during any 12-month period, and defines a retail sale as a sale of tangible personal property for any purpose other than resale in the regular course of business. Existing sales and use tax law provides that a licensed veterinarian is a consumer of, and not a retailer of, drugs and medicines used or furnished by the veterinarian in the performance of his or her professional services, so that the retail sale subject to tax is the sale of drugs and medicines to the licensed veterinarian. This bill would, until January 1, 2018, suspend the provision that a licensed veterinarian is a consumer of drugs and medicines used or furnished by the veterinarian in the performance of his or her professional services. This bill would, until January 1, 2018, exempt from sales and use taxes the gross receipts from the sale in this state of, and the storage, use, or other consumption in this state of, drugs and medicines used, furnished, or sold by a licensed veterinarian, a city, county, city and county, or other local government animal shelter, or a nonprofit animal welfare or rescue organization for the treatment of animals. This bill would require the Legislative Analyst's Office to, by January 1, 2017, with information provided by the State Board of Equalization, conduct and submit a study to the Senate Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review, the Assembly Committee on Budget, the Assembly Committee on Revenue and Taxation, and the Senate Committee on Governance and Finance. The Bradley-Burns Uniform Local Sales and Use Tax Law authorizes counties and cities to impose local sales and use taxes in conformity with the Sales and Use Tax Law, and existing law authorizes districts, as specified, to impose transactions and use taxes in accordance with the Transactions and Use Tax Law, which conforms to the Sales and Use Tax Law. Amendments to state sales and use taxes are incorporated into these laws. Section 2230 of the Revenue and Taxation Code provides that the state will reimburse counties and cities for revenue losses caused by the enactment of sales and use tax exemptions. This bill would provide that, notwithstanding Section 2230 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, no appropriation is made and the state shall not reimburse any local agencies for sales and use tax revenues lost by them pursuant to this bill. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy, but its operative date would depend on its effective date.
- Who sponsors SB 688?
- SB 688 is sponsored by Galgiani.
- What is the current status of SB 688?
- This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 688?
- Track SB 688 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 688
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 688
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →