AB 28 — Economic development: enterprise zones.
Last action — From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
The Enterprise Zone Act provides for the designation and oversight by the Department of Housing and Community Development of various types of economic development areas throughout the state, including enterprise zones, targeted tax areas, and manufacturing enhancement areas, collectively known as geographically targeted economic development areas, or G-TEDAs. Pursuant to these provisions, qualifying entities in those areas may receive certain tax and regulatory incentives. This bill would revise various definitions for purposes of the act and modify specified requirements for designating and administering enterprise zones and G-TEDAs, collectively. The bill would impose new requirements on the Department of Housing and Community Development with respect to the enterprise zone program and modify department and Franchise Tax Board reporting requirements. Existing law, the Enterprise Zone Act, authorizes the Department of Housing and Community Development to assess a fee of not more than $15 on each enterprise zone and manufacturing enhancement area for each application for issuance of a certificate pursuant to specified tax credit provisions. This bill would instead authorize the department to charge a fee for those applications not to exceed the reasonable cost of administering the Enterprise Zone Act, but not to exceed $20. The bill would require any increase in the fee higher than the amount that was charged by the department as of January 1, 2014, to be adopted by regulation. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill Text
- Amended 04/29/13 - Amended Assembly Current pdf April 29, 2013
- Amended 03/04/13 - Amended Assembly pdf March 04, 2013
- Introduced 12/03/12 - Introduced pdf December 03, 2012
- AB28 View text html
Action History
-
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
-
Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Re-referred to Com. on J., E.D., & E.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Amend and re-refer to Com. on J., E.D., & E. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (April 23).
-
Re-referred to Com. on J., E.D., & E.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on J., E.D., & E. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Coms. on J., E.D., & E. and L. GOV.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee January 3.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Alejo · Cosponsor
- Salas · Cosponsor
- Brown · Cosponsor
- Daly · Cosponsor
- Fox · Cosponsor
- Hall · Cosponsor
- Holden · Cosponsor
- Al Muratsuchi · Cosponsor
- Sharon Quirk-Silva · Cosponsor
- Perea · Cosponsor
- Weber · Cosponsor
- V. Manuel Pérez · Primary
- Roger Hernández · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 12 co-sponsors · 109 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (12)
- Alejo
- Salas
- Brown
- Daly
- Fox
- Hall
- Holden
- Muratsuchi, Al Democratic
- Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic
- Perea
- Weber
- Roger Hernández
Not signed on (109)
109 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 109 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Not Voting |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 28 do?
- The Enterprise Zone Act provides for the designation and oversight by the Department of Housing and Community Development of various types of economic development areas throughout the state, including enterprise zones, targeted tax areas, and manufacturing enhancement areas, collectively known as geographically targeted economic development areas, or G-TEDAs. Pursuant to these provisions, qualifying entities in those areas may receive certain tax and regulatory incentives. This bill would revise various definitions for purposes of the act and modify specified requirements for designating and administering enterprise zones and G-TEDAs, collectively. The bill would impose new requirements on the Department of Housing and Community Development with respect to the enterprise zone program and modify department and Franchise Tax Board reporting requirements. Existing law, the Enterprise Zone Act, authorizes the Department of Housing and Community Development to assess a fee of not more than $15 on each enterprise zone and manufacturing enhancement area for each application for issuance of a certificate pursuant to specified tax credit provisions. This bill would instead authorize the department to charge a fee for those applications not to exceed the reasonable cost of administering the Enterprise Zone Act, but not to exceed $20. The bill would require any increase in the fee higher than the amount that was charged by the department as of January 1, 2014, to be adopted by regulation. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
- Who sponsors AB 28?
- AB 28 is sponsored by Alejo, Salas, Brown, Daly, Fox, Hall, Holden, Muratsuchi, Al (Democratic), Quirk-Silva, Sharon (Democratic), Perea, Weber, V. Manuel Pérez, and Roger Hernández.
- What is the current status of AB 28?
- This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 28?
- Track AB 28 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 28
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 28
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →