California 2013-2014 Regular Session Status: In Committee

AB 995 — Public utilities: intervenor fees: customers.

Last action — From committee without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical, gas, telephone, telegraph, and water corporations, as defined, and can establish its own procedures, subject to statutory limitations or directions and constitutional requirements of due process. Existing law requires the commission to award reasonable advocate's fees, reasonable expert witness fees, and other reasonable costs to customers, as defined, of an electrical, gas, telegraph, telephone, and water corporation who comply with specified procedures, if the customer's presentation makes a substantial contribution, as defined, to the adoption, in whole or in part, of the commission's order or decision and the customer's participation or intervention without an award of fees or costs imposes a significant financial hardship, as defined. A "substantial contribution" is defined as meaning that, in the judgment of the commission, the customer's presentation has substantially assisted the commission in the making of its order or decision because the order or decision has adopted in whole or in part one or more factual contentions, legal contentions, or specific policy or procedural recommendations presented by the customer. This bill would require the commission, by July 1, 2015, to adopt rules establishing standards to verify that a customer representative is authorized by consumers, customers, or subscribers of any electrical, gas, telephone, telegraph, or water corporation to represent their interests. The bill would revise the definition of "substantial contribution" to additionally require that the commission find that the customer's participation promoted a public purpose that directly benefits other customers. The bill would require the commission to award reasonable advocate's fees, reasonable expert witness fees, and other reasonable costs to customers of an electrical, gas, telegraph, telephone, and water corporation who comply with specified procedures, if the customer's presentation makes a substantial contribution to the adoption, in whole or in part, of the commission's order or decision and promotes a public purpose that benefits other customers, and the customer's participation or intervention without an award of fees or costs imposes a significant financial hardship, as defined. The bill would prohibit the total amount the commission annually awards for intervenor compensation from exceeding the mean average of awards for the previous 3 calendar years. Existing law provides that participation by a customer that materially supplements, complements, or contributes to the presentation of another party, including the commission staff, may be fully eligible for compensation if the participation makes a substantial contribution to a commission order or decision, consistent with specified requirements. Existing law establishes a division within the commission, known as the Division of Ratepayer Advocates, to represent the interests of public utility customers and subscribers, with the goal of obtaining the lowest possible rate for service consistent with reliable and safe service levels. This bill would provide that a customer's participation that substantially duplicates the presentation of the commission's Division of Ratepayer Advocates, or that falls within the scope and purview of the division, is not eligible for compensation, unless the commission determines that it provided a substantial contribution to promote a public purpose that the division did not provide. Existing law requires a customer who intends to seek an award for intervenor fees to timely file and serve on all parties to the proceeding a notice of intent to claim compensation which includes a statement of the nature and extent of the customer's planned participation in the proceeding and an itemized estimate of the compensation that the customer expects to request, given the likely duration of the proceeding as it appears at the time of the filing of the notice. This bill would additionally require that the notice of intent to claim compensation include a verification of the individual customer or group of customers being represented.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. From committee without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).

  2. In committee: Set, final hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  3. In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  4. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  5. Re-referred to Com. on U. & C.

  6. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on U. & C. Read second time and amended.

  7. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  8. Referred to Com. on U. & C.

  9. Read first time.

  10. From printer. May be heard in committee March 26.

  11. Introduced. To print.

Sponsors

  • Frazier · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Frazier

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

public-safety technology
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 995 do?
Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical, gas, telephone, telegraph, and water corporations, as defined, and can establish its own procedures, subject to statutory limitations or directions and constitutional requirements of due process. Existing law requires the commission to award reasonable advocate's fees, reasonable expert witness fees, and other reasonable costs to customers, as defined, of an electrical, gas, telegraph, telephone, and water corporation who comply with specified procedures, if the customer's presentation makes a substantial contribution, as defined, to the adoption, in whole or in part, of the commission's order or decision and the customer's participation or intervention without an award of fees or costs imposes a significant financial hardship, as defined. A "substantial contribution" is defined as meaning that, in the judgment of the commission, the customer's presentation has substantially assisted the commission in the making of its order or decision because the order or decision has adopted in whole or in part one or more factual contentions, legal contentions, or specific policy or procedural recommendations presented by the customer. This bill would require the commission, by July 1, 2015, to adopt rules establishing standards to verify that a customer representative is authorized by consumers, customers, or subscribers of any electrical, gas, telephone, telegraph, or water corporation to represent their interests. The bill would revise the definition of "substantial contribution" to additionally require that the commission find that the customer's participation promoted a public purpose that directly benefits other customers. The bill would require the commission to award reasonable advocate's fees, reasonable expert witness fees, and other reasonable costs to customers of an electrical, gas, telegraph, telephone, and water corporation who comply with specified procedures, if the customer's presentation makes a substantial contribution to the adoption, in whole or in part, of the commission's order or decision and promotes a public purpose that benefits other customers, and the customer's participation or intervention without an award of fees or costs imposes a significant financial hardship, as defined. The bill would prohibit the total amount the commission annually awards for intervenor compensation from exceeding the mean average of awards for the previous 3 calendar years. Existing law provides that participation by a customer that materially supplements, complements, or contributes to the presentation of another party, including the commission staff, may be fully eligible for compensation if the participation makes a substantial contribution to a commission order or decision, consistent with specified requirements. Existing law establishes a division within the commission, known as the Division of Ratepayer Advocates, to represent the interests of public utility customers and subscribers, with the goal of obtaining the lowest possible rate for service consistent with reliable and safe service levels. This bill would provide that a customer's participation that substantially duplicates the presentation of the commission's Division of Ratepayer Advocates, or that falls within the scope and purview of the division, is not eligible for compensation, unless the commission determines that it provided a substantial contribution to promote a public purpose that the division did not provide. Existing law requires a customer who intends to seek an award for intervenor fees to timely file and serve on all parties to the proceeding a notice of intent to claim compensation which includes a statement of the nature and extent of the customer's planned participation in the proceeding and an itemized estimate of the compensation that the customer expects to request, given the likely duration of the proceeding as it appears at the time of the filing of the notice. This bill would additionally require that the notice of intent to claim compensation include a verification of the individual customer or group of customers being represented.
Who sponsors AB 995?
AB 995 is sponsored by Frazier.
What is the current status of AB 995?
This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 995?
Track AB 995 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 995

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 995

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →