Public officers and employees: financial interests.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1059 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1059.
You're tracking AB 1059
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1059 — Public officers and employees: financial interests.
Last action — From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law prohibits Members of the Legislature, and state, county, district, judicial district, and city officers or employees from being financially interested in any contract made by them in their official capacity, or by any body or board of which they are members. Existing law further prohibits these public officers and employees from being purchasers at any sale, or vendors at any purchase, made by them in their official capacity. A violation of these provisions is a crime. This bill would extend the application of those prohibitions to independent contractors who perform a public function, and specifically provide when an independent contractor, or an owner, officer, employee, or agent of the independent contractor, has a financial interest in a contract. By expanding the scope of a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Amended 04/01/13 - Amended Assembly Current pdf April 01, 2013
- Introduced 02/22/13 - Introduced pdf February 22, 2013
- AB1059 View text html
Action History
-
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
-
Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Re-referred to Com. on E. & R.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on E. & R. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on E. & R.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 26.
-
Introduced. To print.
Sponsors
- Wieckowski · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Wieckowski
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1059 do?
- Existing law prohibits Members of the Legislature, and state, county, district, judicial district, and city officers or employees from being financially interested in any contract made by them in their official capacity, or by any body or board of which they are members. Existing law further prohibits these public officers and employees from being purchasers at any sale, or vendors at any purchase, made by them in their official capacity. A violation of these provisions is a crime. This bill would extend the application of those prohibitions to independent contractors who perform a public function, and specifically provide when an independent contractor, or an owner, officer, employee, or agent of the independent contractor, has a financial interest in a contract. By expanding the scope of a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 1059?
- AB 1059 is sponsored by Wieckowski.
- What is the current status of AB 1059?
- This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1059?
- Track AB 1059 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1059
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1059
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →