Health care coverage: hospital billing.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 351 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 351.
You're tracking SB 351
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 351 — Health care coverage: hospital billing.
Last action — Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law provides for the licensure and regulation of health facilities by the State Department of Public Health. Existing law requires hospitals to maintain a written policy regarding discount payments for financially qualified patients as well as a written charity care policy. Existing law requires a hospital to limit the expected payment for services it provides to certain low-income patients to the highest amount the hospital would expect to receive for providing services from a government-sponsored program of health benefits in which the hospital participates. Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care. This bill would, until January 1, 2019, require a diagnosis and billing outlier hospital, as defined, and a hospital that is part of a diagnosis and billing outlier health system, as defined, to notify the patient and all payers of that status and that the hospital's total billed charges may be subject to adjustment as described below. The bill would make a failure to provide that notification a felony or a misdemeanor. By expanding the definition of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development, until January 1, 2019, to assign each hospital, as defined, a separate diagnosis and billing indicator rate for 4 specified disorders and to calculate a hospital's diagnosis and billing indicator rate for each of those disorders, as specified. The bill would require the office to post specified information on its Internet Web site by January 15, 2014, including those diagnosis and billing indicator rates and a list of diagnosis and billing outlier hospitals. The bill would require the State Department of Public Health, by July 1, 2014, and until January 1, 2019, to contract with one or more independent medical review organizations, or the Department of Managed Health Care, to conduct reviews that a patient or payer could request within one year of receiving a bill from a diagnosis and billing outlier hospital or a hospital in a diagnosis and billing outlier health system, on and after January 15, 2014. The bill would require the review, among other things, to address the appropriateness of diagnostic codes, whether the billed services were actually provided to the patient, whether provided services were medically necessary or appropriate, and what adjustments, if any, should be made to the bills to decrease the total charges. The bill would require, upon receipt of the final report, the State Public Health Officer to immediately adopt the findings of the independent medical review organization, and promptly issue a written decision to the patient, other payers, and the hospital that would be binding on the hospital. The bill would require a hospital to adjust any charges necessary in accordance with the written decision within 30 days. The bill would subject a hospital that fails to provide the above-described adjusted bill or reimbursement of excess charges to a $100 civil penalty each day until it complies. The bill would authorize the State Department of Public Health to adopt regulations to implement these provisions. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Amended 04/23/13 - Amended Senate Current pdf April 23, 2013
- Introduced 02/20/13 - Introduced pdf February 20, 2013
- SB351 View text html
Action History
-
Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
-
Held in committee and under submission.
-
Set for hearing May 23.
-
Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
Set for hearing May 13.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 2. Page 791.) (May 1). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing May 1.
-
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Referred to Com. on RLS.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 23.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Hernandez · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Hernandez
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 0% | 0% | 29% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 78% | 22% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 351 do?
- Existing law provides for the licensure and regulation of health facilities by the State Department of Public Health. Existing law requires hospitals to maintain a written policy regarding discount payments for financially qualified patients as well as a written charity care policy. Existing law requires a hospital to limit the expected payment for services it provides to certain low-income patients to the highest amount the hospital would expect to receive for providing services from a government-sponsored program of health benefits in which the hospital participates. Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care. This bill would, until January 1, 2019, require a diagnosis and billing outlier hospital, as defined, and a hospital that is part of a diagnosis and billing outlier health system, as defined, to notify the patient and all payers of that status and that the hospital's total billed charges may be subject to adjustment as described below. The bill would make a failure to provide that notification a felony or a misdemeanor. By expanding the definition of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development, until January 1, 2019, to assign each hospital, as defined, a separate diagnosis and billing indicator rate for 4 specified disorders and to calculate a hospital's diagnosis and billing indicator rate for each of those disorders, as specified. The bill would require the office to post specified information on its Internet Web site by January 15, 2014, including those diagnosis and billing indicator rates and a list of diagnosis and billing outlier hospitals. The bill would require the State Department of Public Health, by July 1, 2014, and until January 1, 2019, to contract with one or more independent medical review organizations, or the Department of Managed Health Care, to conduct reviews that a patient or payer could request within one year of receiving a bill from a diagnosis and billing outlier hospital or a hospital in a diagnosis and billing outlier health system, on and after January 15, 2014. The bill would require the review, among other things, to address the appropriateness of diagnostic codes, whether the billed services were actually provided to the patient, whether provided services were medically necessary or appropriate, and what adjustments, if any, should be made to the bills to decrease the total charges. The bill would require, upon receipt of the final report, the State Public Health Officer to immediately adopt the findings of the independent medical review organization, and promptly issue a written decision to the patient, other payers, and the hospital that would be binding on the hospital. The bill would require a hospital to adjust any charges necessary in accordance with the written decision within 30 days. The bill would subject a hospital that fails to provide the above-described adjusted bill or reimbursement of excess charges to a $100 civil penalty each day until it complies. The bill would authorize the State Department of Public Health to adopt regulations to implement these provisions. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors SB 351?
- SB 351 is sponsored by Hernandez.
- What is the current status of SB 351?
- This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 351?
- Track SB 351 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 351
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 351
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →