Energy: powerplants: Ventura County.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 248 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 248.
You're tracking AB 248
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 248 — Energy: powerplants: Ventura County.
Last action — From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Under existing law, the State Water Resources Control Board and the 9 California regional water quality control boards regulate water quality in accordance with the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act (act) and the federal Clean Water Act. Under the act, the state board is required to adopt specified state policies with respect to water quality as it relates to the coastal marine environment, including a policy requiring new or expanded coastal powerplants and other industrial installations using seawater for cooling, heating, or industrial processing to use the best available site, design, technology, and mitigation measures feasible to minimize the intake and mortality of all forms of marine life. This bill would require the Public Utilities Commission and the Independent System Operator, in consultation with specified entities, to submit to the Legislature, on or before January 1, 2015, a report on policies, recommended legislative actions, and incentives necessary to accomplish specified objectives related to once-through cooling powerplants in Ventura County while preserving and enhancing electric system reliability in the Counties of Santa Barbara and Ventura. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the County of Ventura.
Bill Text
- Amended 04/04/13 - Amended Assembly Current pdf April 04, 2013
- Amended 03/19/13 - Amended Assembly pdf March 19, 2013
- Introduced 02/06/13 - Introduced pdf February 06, 2013
- AB248 View text html
Action History
-
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
-
Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.
-
In committee: Set second hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.
-
Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Page 1144.)
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.
-
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Coms. on NAT. RES. and U. & C.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 9.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Gorell · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Gorell
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 3 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 33% | 22% | 0% | 44% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Chesbro | — | Not Voting |
| Stone | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Not Voting |
| Williams | — | Nay |
| Garcia, Robert | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Stone | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Garcia, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 248 do?
- Under existing law, the State Water Resources Control Board and the 9 California regional water quality control boards regulate water quality in accordance with the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act (act) and the federal Clean Water Act. Under the act, the state board is required to adopt specified state policies with respect to water quality as it relates to the coastal marine environment, including a policy requiring new or expanded coastal powerplants and other industrial installations using seawater for cooling, heating, or industrial processing to use the best available site, design, technology, and mitigation measures feasible to minimize the intake and mortality of all forms of marine life. This bill would require the Public Utilities Commission and the Independent System Operator, in consultation with specified entities, to submit to the Legislature, on or before January 1, 2015, a report on policies, recommended legislative actions, and incentives necessary to accomplish specified objectives related to once-through cooling powerplants in Ventura County while preserving and enhancing electric system reliability in the Counties of Santa Barbara and Ventura. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the County of Ventura.
- Who sponsors AB 248?
- AB 248 is sponsored by Gorell.
- What is the current status of AB 248?
- This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 248?
- Track AB 248 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 248
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 248
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →