SB 736 — Electrical generation facility: upgrades: permit fees.
Last action — Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law imposes various limitations on emissions of air contaminants for the control of air pollution from vehicular and nonvehicular sources. Existing law generally designates the State Air Resources Board as the state agency with the primary responsibility for the control of vehicular air pollution, and air pollution control and air quality management districts (districts) with the primary responsibility for the control of air pollution from all sources other than vehicular sources. Existing law authorizes the board of each air pollution control and air quality management district to establish a permit system that requires a person that uses certain types of equipment that may cause the emission of air contaminants to obtain a permit. This bill would prohibit a district from assessing a permit modification fee on the operator or owner of a electrical generation facility that participates in a specified emission offset transfer when a modification of the electrical generation facility results in increased thermal efficiency for the electrical generating units and does not increase the gross generating capacity. By imposing new duties on districts, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removed1 line(s) added, 1 removed.
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBillText Information PDF2 Bill PDF |Add To My Favorites | Version:
View plain text versions (2)
- Introduced 02/22/13 - Introduced Current pdf February 22, 2013
- SB736 View text html
Action History
-
Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
-
Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Set for hearing April 17.
-
Referred to Com. on E.Q.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 26.
-
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Wright · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Wright
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 736 do?
- Existing law imposes various limitations on emissions of air contaminants for the control of air pollution from vehicular and nonvehicular sources. Existing law generally designates the State Air Resources Board as the state agency with the primary responsibility for the control of vehicular air pollution, and air pollution control and air quality management districts (districts) with the primary responsibility for the control of air pollution from all sources other than vehicular sources. Existing law authorizes the board of each air pollution control and air quality management district to establish a permit system that requires a person that uses certain types of equipment that may cause the emission of air contaminants to obtain a permit. This bill would prohibit a district from assessing a permit modification fee on the operator or owner of a electrical generation facility that participates in a specified emission offset transfer when a modification of the electrical generation facility results in increased thermal efficiency for the electrical generating units and does not increase the gross generating capacity. By imposing new duties on districts, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
- Who sponsors SB 736?
- SB 736 is sponsored by Wright.
- What is the current status of SB 736?
- This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 736?
- Track SB 736 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 736
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 736
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →