State Highway Route 12.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 1095 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 1095.
You're tracking SB 1095
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 1095 — State Highway Route 12.
Last action — From committee without further action.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law provides for the California Transportation Commission, except as otherwise provided by law, to adopt the location for a state highway on routes authorized by law. Existing law generally describes the various authorized routes in the state highway system. Existing law also describes the various segments of state highway routes that are authorized to be developed as freeways and expressways, and includes these segments in the freeway and expressway system. Existing law includes specified segments of State Highway Route 12 in the freeway and expressway system, including a segment between Route 101 near Santa Rosa to Melita Road near Santa Rosa. This bill would revise the description of this segment of State Highway Route 12 in the freeway and expressway system to instead refer to the portion of the segment from Route 101 in Santa Rosa to Farmers Lane in Santa Rosa, thereby deleting a porton of State Highway Route 12 from the freeway and expressway system. The bill would also state the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation to declare as surplus property approximately 55 acres of the right-of-way acquired by the Department of Transportation for the now abandoned State Highway Route 12 freeway alignment in the City of Santa Rosa and the County of Sonoma, and to transfer the property to local agencies for park and recreation purposes, to be known as the Southeast Greenway.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removed1 line(s) added, 1 removed.
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBillText Information PDF2 Bill PDF |Add To My Favorites | Version:
View plain text versions (2)
- Introduced 02/19/14 - Introduced Current pdf February 19, 2014
- SB1095 View text html
Action History
-
From committee without further action.
-
Held in committee and under submission.
-
Set for hearing May 23.
-
Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
Set for hearing May 12.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 3313.) (April 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing April 29.
-
Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Set for hearing April 22.
-
Referred to Com. on T. & H.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 22.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Evans · Primary
- Levine · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Evans
Co-sponsors (1)
- Levine
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1095 do?
- Existing law provides for the California Transportation Commission, except as otherwise provided by law, to adopt the location for a state highway on routes authorized by law. Existing law generally describes the various authorized routes in the state highway system. Existing law also describes the various segments of state highway routes that are authorized to be developed as freeways and expressways, and includes these segments in the freeway and expressway system. Existing law includes specified segments of State Highway Route 12 in the freeway and expressway system, including a segment between Route 101 near Santa Rosa to Melita Road near Santa Rosa. This bill would revise the description of this segment of State Highway Route 12 in the freeway and expressway system to instead refer to the portion of the segment from Route 101 in Santa Rosa to Farmers Lane in Santa Rosa, thereby deleting a porton of State Highway Route 12 from the freeway and expressway system. The bill would also state the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation to declare as surplus property approximately 55 acres of the right-of-way acquired by the Department of Transportation for the now abandoned State Highway Route 12 freeway alignment in the City of Santa Rosa and the County of Sonoma, and to transfer the property to local agencies for park and recreation purposes, to be known as the Southeast Greenway.
- Who sponsors SB 1095?
- SB 1095 is sponsored by Evans and Levine.
- What is the current status of SB 1095?
- This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1095?
- Track SB 1095 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1095
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1095
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →