AB 1192 — Vehicles: parking: motorcycles.
Last action — From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law establishes requirements regarding the parking of motor vehicles. Existing law authorizes a local authority, by ordinance or resolution, to establish parking requirements for motor vehicles within the local authority's jurisdiction. Existing law, except as otherwise specified, makes it unlawful and constitutes an infraction for any person to violate, or fail to comply with any provision of the Vehicle Code, or any local ordinance adopted pursuant to the Vehicle Code. This bill would prohibit an owner or operator of a public or private offstreet parking facility from prohibiting motorcycles from using the facility. The bill would also prohibit a local authority from prohibiting a motorcycle from parking at a location at which other motor vehicles are authorized to park. Because a violation of this provision is a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removed1 line(s) added, 1 removed.
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBillText Information PDF2 Bill PDF |Add To My Favorites | Version:
View plain text versions (2)
- Introduced 02/22/13 - Introduced Current pdf February 22, 2013
- AB1192 View text html
Action History
-
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
-
Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Coms. on TRANS. and L. GOV.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 26.
-
Introduced. To print.
Sponsors
- Beth Gaines · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1192 do?
- Existing law establishes requirements regarding the parking of motor vehicles. Existing law authorizes a local authority, by ordinance or resolution, to establish parking requirements for motor vehicles within the local authority's jurisdiction. Existing law, except as otherwise specified, makes it unlawful and constitutes an infraction for any person to violate, or fail to comply with any provision of the Vehicle Code, or any local ordinance adopted pursuant to the Vehicle Code. This bill would prohibit an owner or operator of a public or private offstreet parking facility from prohibiting motorcycles from using the facility. The bill would also prohibit a local authority from prohibiting a motorcycle from parking at a location at which other motor vehicles are authorized to park. Because a violation of this provision is a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 1192?
- AB 1192 is sponsored by Beth Gaines.
- What is the current status of AB 1192?
- This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1192?
- Track AB 1192 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1192
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1192
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →