Solid waste: single-use carryout bags.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 405 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 405.
You're tracking SB 405
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 405 — Solid waste: single-use carryout bags.
Last action — Died on file pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law, until January 1, 2020, requires an operator of a store, as defined, to establish an at-store recycling program that provides to customers the opportunity to return clean plastic carryout bags to that store. With specified exceptions, this bill, as of January 1, 2015, would prohibit stores that have a specified amount of dollar sales or retail floor space from providing a single-use carryout bag to a customer. The bill, on and after July 1, 2016, would additionally impose this prohibition on convenience food stores, foodmarts, and certain other specified stores. The bill would require all of these stores to meet other specified requirements regarding providing recycled paper bags, compostable bags, or reusable grocery bags to customers. The bill would require a reusable grocery bag that a store is required to sell on and after July 1, 2016, to meet specified requirements. A violation of that requirement and the requirements that would be imposed upon grocery bag producers to submit certain laboratory test results would be subject to an administrative civil penalty assessed by the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery. The department would be required to deposit these penalties into the Reusable Bag Account, which would be created in the Integrated Waste Management Fund, for expenditure by the department, upon appropriation by the Legislature, to implement those requirements. The bill would allow a city, county, or city and county, or the state to impose civil penalties for a violation of the bill's requirements. The bill would require these civil penalties to be paid to the office of the city attorney, city prosecutor, district attorney, or Attorney General, whichever office brought the action, and would allow the penalties collected by the Attorney General to be expended by the Attorney General, upon appropriation by the Legislature, to enforce the bill's provisions. The bill would provide that these remedies are not exclusive, as specified. The bill would declare that it occupies the whole field of the regulation of reusable grocery bags, single-use carryout bags, and recycled paper bags and would prohibit a local public agency, on and after January 1, 2014, from enforcing or implementing an ordinance, resolution, regulation, or rule adopted on or after September 1, 2013, relating to those bags, unless expressly authorized. The bill would allow a local public agency that has adopted such an ordinance, resolution, regulation, or rule prior to September 1, 2013, to continue to enforce and implement that ordinance, resolution, regulation, or rule, but would require any amendments to that ordinance, resolution, regulation, or rule to be subject to state preemption.
Bill Text
- Amended 05/24/13 - Amended Senate Current pdf May 24, 2013
- Amended 04/02/13 - Amended Senate pdf April 02, 2013
- Introduced 02/20/13 - Introduced pdf February 20, 2013
- SB405 View text html
Action History
-
Died on file pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
-
Ordered to inactive file on request of Senator Padilla.
-
Reconsideration granted. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 1204.)
-
Motion to reconsider made by Senator Padilla.
-
Read third time. Refused passage. (Ayes 18. Noes 17. Page 1204.)
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 4. Noes 3. Page 1013.) (May 23).
-
Set for hearing May 23.
-
Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
Set for hearing April 29.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 3. Page 565.) (April 17). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing April 17.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
-
Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Set for hearing April 3.
-
Referred to Com. on E.Q.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 23.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Leno · Cosponsor
- Stephen C. Padilla · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 3 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic
Co-sponsors (1)
- Leno
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 16 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 18 | 17 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 46% | 44% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Nay |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wright | — | Not Voting |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Cannella | — | Nay |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Nay |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| De León | — | Nay |
| Hueso | — | Not Voting |
| Price | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Not Voting |
| Correa | — | Nay |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Yee | — | Nay |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 35 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 38 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Not Voting |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 57% | 43% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Nay |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 56% | 33% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Not Voting |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 405 do?
- Existing law, until January 1, 2020, requires an operator of a store, as defined, to establish an at-store recycling program that provides to customers the opportunity to return clean plastic carryout bags to that store. With specified exceptions, this bill, as of January 1, 2015, would prohibit stores that have a specified amount of dollar sales or retail floor space from providing a single-use carryout bag to a customer. The bill, on and after July 1, 2016, would additionally impose this prohibition on convenience food stores, foodmarts, and certain other specified stores. The bill would require all of these stores to meet other specified requirements regarding providing recycled paper bags, compostable bags, or reusable grocery bags to customers. The bill would require a reusable grocery bag that a store is required to sell on and after July 1, 2016, to meet specified requirements. A violation of that requirement and the requirements that would be imposed upon grocery bag producers to submit certain laboratory test results would be subject to an administrative civil penalty assessed by the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery. The department would be required to deposit these penalties into the Reusable Bag Account, which would be created in the Integrated Waste Management Fund, for expenditure by the department, upon appropriation by the Legislature, to implement those requirements. The bill would allow a city, county, or city and county, or the state to impose civil penalties for a violation of the bill's requirements. The bill would require these civil penalties to be paid to the office of the city attorney, city prosecutor, district attorney, or Attorney General, whichever office brought the action, and would allow the penalties collected by the Attorney General to be expended by the Attorney General, upon appropriation by the Legislature, to enforce the bill's provisions. The bill would provide that these remedies are not exclusive, as specified. The bill would declare that it occupies the whole field of the regulation of reusable grocery bags, single-use carryout bags, and recycled paper bags and would prohibit a local public agency, on and after January 1, 2014, from enforcing or implementing an ordinance, resolution, regulation, or rule adopted on or after September 1, 2013, relating to those bags, unless expressly authorized. The bill would allow a local public agency that has adopted such an ordinance, resolution, regulation, or rule prior to September 1, 2013, to continue to enforce and implement that ordinance, resolution, regulation, or rule, but would require any amendments to that ordinance, resolution, regulation, or rule to be subject to state preemption.
- Who sponsors SB 405?
- SB 405 is sponsored by Leno and Padilla, Stephen C. (Democratic).
- What is the current status of SB 405?
- This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 405?
- Track SB 405 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 405
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 405
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →