Crimes: enhancements: punishment: state prison.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 222 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 222.
You're tracking AB 222
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 222 — Crimes: enhancements: punishment: state prison.
Last action — From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law generally requires that felonies punishable by imprisonment in a county jail be punished either by the term described in the underlying offense or by a term of 16 months, or 2 or 3 years if the term is not specified. Existing law requires an executed sentence for these felonies to be punished in state prison if the defendant has a prior or current felony conviction for a serious or violent felony, is required to register as a sex offender, or is convicted of a crime for which the white collar crime enhancement is imposed as part of the sentence. Existing law imposes an additional term for a conviction of a violation of, or of a conspiracy to violate, specified provisions of law with respect to a substance containing heroin, cocaine base, cocaine, methamphetamine, amphetamine, or phencyclidine and its analogs, if the substance exceeds a specified weight. Existing law imposes a greater additional term under these provisions depending on the weight of the substance. This bill would additionally require an executed sentence to be punished in state prison if the defendant is convicted of a crime for which an enhancement is imposed pursuant to the above provision regarding those specified substances.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removed1 line(s) added, 1 removed.
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBillText Information PDF2 Bill PDF |Add To My Favorites | Version:
View plain text versions (2)
- Introduced 02/04/13 - Introduced Current pdf February 04, 2013
- AB222 View text html
Action History
-
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
-
Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.
-
In committee: Set first hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.
-
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 7.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Cooley · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Cooley
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 29% | 43% | 0% | 29% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Skinner | — | Not Voting |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Not Voting |
| Ammiano | — | Nay |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Nay |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 222 do?
- Existing law generally requires that felonies punishable by imprisonment in a county jail be punished either by the term described in the underlying offense or by a term of 16 months, or 2 or 3 years if the term is not specified. Existing law requires an executed sentence for these felonies to be punished in state prison if the defendant has a prior or current felony conviction for a serious or violent felony, is required to register as a sex offender, or is convicted of a crime for which the white collar crime enhancement is imposed as part of the sentence. Existing law imposes an additional term for a conviction of a violation of, or of a conspiracy to violate, specified provisions of law with respect to a substance containing heroin, cocaine base, cocaine, methamphetamine, amphetamine, or phencyclidine and its analogs, if the substance exceeds a specified weight. Existing law imposes a greater additional term under these provisions depending on the weight of the substance. This bill would additionally require an executed sentence to be punished in state prison if the defendant is convicted of a crime for which an enhancement is imposed pursuant to the above provision regarding those specified substances.
- Who sponsors AB 222?
- AB 222 is sponsored by Cooley.
- What is the current status of AB 222?
- This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 222?
- Track AB 222 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 222
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 222
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →