SB 312 — Absences: confidential medical services: parent or guardian consent.
Last action — Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law requires the governing board of each school district, each academic year, to notify pupils in grades 7 to 12, inclusive, and the parents or guardians of all pupils enrolled in the district, that the school authorities may excuse a pupil from the school for confidential medical services without the consent of the pupil's parent or guardian. This bill would instead require the governing board to notify pupils in grades 9 to 12, inclusive, and the parents or guardians of all pupils enrolled in the district, that school authorities may excuse, for these purposes, a pupil 16 years of age or older from school without parental or guardian consent. The bill would prohibit a school district from excusing a pupil 15 years of age or younger from the school for the purpose of obtaining confidential medical services without parental or guardian consent. To the extent this bill would require a school district to change its notification policy and procedure, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill Text
- Amended 04/01/13 - Amended Senate Current pdf April 01, 2013
- Introduced 02/15/13 - Introduced pdf February 15, 2013
- SB312 View text html
Action History
-
Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
-
Set, second hearing. Failed passage in committee. (Ayes 3. Noes 5. Page 694.) Reconsideration granted.
-
Set for hearing April 24.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on ED.
-
Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Set for hearing April 3.
-
Referred to Com. on ED.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 21.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Knight · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Knight
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 3 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 33% | 56% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Block | — | Nay |
| Hueso | — | Not Voting |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Nay |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Nay |
| Hancock | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Block | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 312 do?
- Existing law requires the governing board of each school district, each academic year, to notify pupils in grades 7 to 12, inclusive, and the parents or guardians of all pupils enrolled in the district, that the school authorities may excuse a pupil from the school for confidential medical services without the consent of the pupil's parent or guardian. This bill would instead require the governing board to notify pupils in grades 9 to 12, inclusive, and the parents or guardians of all pupils enrolled in the district, that school authorities may excuse, for these purposes, a pupil 16 years of age or older from school without parental or guardian consent. The bill would prohibit a school district from excusing a pupil 15 years of age or younger from the school for the purpose of obtaining confidential medical services without parental or guardian consent. To the extent this bill would require a school district to change its notification policy and procedure, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
- Who sponsors SB 312?
- SB 312 is sponsored by Knight.
- What is the current status of SB 312?
- This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 312?
- Track SB 312 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 312
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 312
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →