AB 669 — Oil and gas: drilling.
Last action — Died on inactive file.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Under existing law, the Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources in the Department of Conservation regulates the drilling, operation, maintenance, and abandonment of oil and gas wells in the state. The State Oil and Gas Supervisor supervises the drilling, operation, maintenance, and abandonment of wells and the operation, maintenance, and removal or abandonment of tanks and facilities related to oil and gas production within an oil and gas field regarding safety and environmental damage. Existing law further requires a person who acquires the right to operate a well or production facility, whether by purchase, transfer, assignment, conveyance, exchange, or other disposition, to meet specific requirements before drilling operations. This bill would additionally require the operator prior to drilling, redrilling, or deepening operations to submit proof to the supervisor that the applicable regional water quality control board has approved the disposal method and location of wastewater disposal for the well. Existing law requires the supervisor, on or before the first day of October of each year, to make public a report on specified information. Existing law requires an operator of a well, on or before the end of each month, to file with the supervisor a statement for the last preceding calendar month detailing specified information. This bill would additionally require the supervisor to include information on the origin and total amount of freshwater used in each county for the production of oil and gas production, the disposal of wastewater from oil and gas production in each county, and the well casing failures in each county. The bill would additionally require the operator of a well to include in the statement information on the origin and total amount of freshwater used in each well or in each oil field if the operator has multiple wells within the oil field, and the disposal of wastewater. Because a violation of this requirement is a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would require the operator of a well, at least 30 days prior to commencing a hydraulic fracturing treatment, as defined, to provide a copy of the approved hydraulic fracturing treatment permit to specified surface property owners. The bill would authorize those property owners to request the applicable regional water quality control board to perform water quality sampling and testing on any water well suitable for drinking or irrigation purposes, as specified. The bill would require a notice of intent to drill, rework, or deepen a well where hydraulic fracturing will occur to include specified information. The bill would require, as a part of a notice of intent to drill, rework, or deepen a well where hydraulic fracturing will occur, the operation of a well to provide to the appropriate water quality control board a groundwater monitoring plan containing specified information for approval under specified circumstances. Because a violation of these requirements is a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Amended 05/24/13 - Amended Assembly Current pdf May 24, 2013
- Amended 04/17/13 - Amended Assembly pdf April 17, 2013
- Amended 04/01/13 - Amended Assembly pdf April 01, 2013
- Introduced 02/21/13 - Introduced pdf February 21, 2013
- AB669 View text html
Action History
-
Died on inactive file.
-
Ordered to inactive file at the request of Assembly Member Atkins.
-
Reconsideration granted. (Page 1981.)
-
June 13-Motion to reconsider continued.
-
Motion to reconsider made by Assembly Member Stone.
-
Read third time. Refused passage. (Ayes 32. Noes 32. Page 1846.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) .
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (April 15).
-
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Williams · Cosponsor
- Mark Stone · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 6 voted No
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (1)
- Williams
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 29 | 27 | 0 | 12 |
| Democratic | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 32 | 32 | 0 | 15 |
| % of votes cast | 41% | 41% | 0% | 19% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Not Voting |
| Brown | — | Nay |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Linder | — | Nay |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Not Voting |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Not Voting |
| Bocanegra | — | Not Voting |
| Holden | — | Not Voting |
| Bonilla | — | Not Voting |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Medina | — | Nay |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Cooley | — | Not Voting |
| Daly | — | Not Voting |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Stone | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Nay |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Perea | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Not Voting |
| Wieckowski | — | Not Voting |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Fox | — | Nay |
| Frazier | — | Nay |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Roger Hernández | — | Not Voting |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Not Voting |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Nay |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Garcia, Robert | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Stone | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Garcia, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 669 do?
- Under existing law, the Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources in the Department of Conservation regulates the drilling, operation, maintenance, and abandonment of oil and gas wells in the state. The State Oil and Gas Supervisor supervises the drilling, operation, maintenance, and abandonment of wells and the operation, maintenance, and removal or abandonment of tanks and facilities related to oil and gas production within an oil and gas field regarding safety and environmental damage. Existing law further requires a person who acquires the right to operate a well or production facility, whether by purchase, transfer, assignment, conveyance, exchange, or other disposition, to meet specific requirements before drilling operations. This bill would additionally require the operator prior to drilling, redrilling, or deepening operations to submit proof to the supervisor that the applicable regional water quality control board has approved the disposal method and location of wastewater disposal for the well. Existing law requires the supervisor, on or before the first day of October of each year, to make public a report on specified information. Existing law requires an operator of a well, on or before the end of each month, to file with the supervisor a statement for the last preceding calendar month detailing specified information. This bill would additionally require the supervisor to include information on the origin and total amount of freshwater used in each county for the production of oil and gas production, the disposal of wastewater from oil and gas production in each county, and the well casing failures in each county. The bill would additionally require the operator of a well to include in the statement information on the origin and total amount of freshwater used in each well or in each oil field if the operator has multiple wells within the oil field, and the disposal of wastewater. Because a violation of this requirement is a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would require the operator of a well, at least 30 days prior to commencing a hydraulic fracturing treatment, as defined, to provide a copy of the approved hydraulic fracturing treatment permit to specified surface property owners. The bill would authorize those property owners to request the applicable regional water quality control board to perform water quality sampling and testing on any water well suitable for drinking or irrigation purposes, as specified. The bill would require a notice of intent to drill, rework, or deepen a well where hydraulic fracturing will occur to include specified information. The bill would require, as a part of a notice of intent to drill, rework, or deepen a well where hydraulic fracturing will occur, the operation of a well to provide to the appropriate water quality control board a groundwater monitoring plan containing specified information for approval under specified circumstances. Because a violation of these requirements is a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 669?
- AB 669 is sponsored by Williams and Mark Stone.
- What is the current status of AB 669?
- This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 669?
- Track AB 669 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 669
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 669
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →