AB 1216 — Pupil discipline: suspension and expulsion: hate violence.
Last action — From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
(1) Existing law prohibits a pupil from being suspended from school or recommended for expulsion unless the superintendent of the school district or principal of the school determines that the pupil has committed any of various specified acts. Existing law further provides that a pupil in any of grades 4 to 12, inclusive, may be suspended from school or recommend for expulsion if the superintendent of the school district or principal of the school determines that the pupil caused, attempted to cause, threatened to cause, or participated in an act of, hate violence, as defined. This bill would additionally provide that a pupil in any of grades 4 to 12, inclusive, may also be suspended from school or recommended for expulsion if the superintendent of the school district or principal of the school determines that the pupil, by force or threat of force, willfully injured, intimidated, interfered with, oppressed, or threatened any other pupil because of the other pupil's actual or perceived familial status, socioeconomic status, or weight. To the extent the bill would impose additional duties on school districts, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill Text
- Amended 01/06/14 - Amended Assembly Current pdf January 06, 2014
- Introduced 02/22/13 - Introduced pdf February 22, 2013
- AB1216 View text html
Action History
-
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
-
Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on ED.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 26.
-
Introduced. To print.
Sponsors
- Campos · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Campos
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1216 do?
- (1) Existing law prohibits a pupil from being suspended from school or recommended for expulsion unless the superintendent of the school district or principal of the school determines that the pupil has committed any of various specified acts. Existing law further provides that a pupil in any of grades 4 to 12, inclusive, may be suspended from school or recommend for expulsion if the superintendent of the school district or principal of the school determines that the pupil caused, attempted to cause, threatened to cause, or participated in an act of, hate violence, as defined. This bill would additionally provide that a pupil in any of grades 4 to 12, inclusive, may also be suspended from school or recommended for expulsion if the superintendent of the school district or principal of the school determines that the pupil, by force or threat of force, willfully injured, intimidated, interfered with, oppressed, or threatened any other pupil because of the other pupil's actual or perceived familial status, socioeconomic status, or weight. To the extent the bill would impose additional duties on school districts, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
- Who sponsors AB 1216?
- AB 1216 is sponsored by Campos.
- What is the current status of AB 1216?
- This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1216?
- Track AB 1216 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1216
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1216
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →