Courts: court reporters.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 1313 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 1313.
You're tracking SB 1313
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 1313 — Courts: court reporters.
Last action — From committee without further action.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
The Trial Court Employment Protection and Governance Act establishes a trial court employee personnel system that provides authority to establish job classifications, salaries, and benefits for trial court employees, including court reporters, without the approval of the county or the board of supervisors, and without further legislative action, except as specified. Existing law authorizes a court to direct the making of a verbatim record of court proceedings, as specified. Existing law also regulates the appointment, certain conditions of employment, remuneration, and benefits of official court reporters in specified counties. This bill would repeal those provisions of law prescribing the compensation and conditions of employment of official court reporters in Butte, El Dorado, Lake, Mendocino, Merced, Modoc, Mono, Monterey, Nevada, San Luis Obispo, Solano, Tehama, Trinity, and Tuolumne Counties.
Bill Text
- Amended 04/21/14 - Amended Senate Current pdf April 21, 2014
- Introduced 02/21/14 - Introduced pdf February 21, 2014
- SB1313 View text html
Action History
-
From committee without further action.
-
Set, first hearing. Failed passage in committee. (Ayes 2. Noes 5. Page 3309.) Reconsideration granted.
-
Set for hearing April 29.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
Referred to Com. on JUD.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 24.
-
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Nielsen · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Nielsen
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 29% | 71% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Nay |
| Leno | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Nay |
| Corbett | — | Nay |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1313 do?
- The Trial Court Employment Protection and Governance Act establishes a trial court employee personnel system that provides authority to establish job classifications, salaries, and benefits for trial court employees, including court reporters, without the approval of the county or the board of supervisors, and without further legislative action, except as specified. Existing law authorizes a court to direct the making of a verbatim record of court proceedings, as specified. Existing law also regulates the appointment, certain conditions of employment, remuneration, and benefits of official court reporters in specified counties. This bill would repeal those provisions of law prescribing the compensation and conditions of employment of official court reporters in Butte, El Dorado, Lake, Mendocino, Merced, Modoc, Mono, Monterey, Nevada, San Luis Obispo, Solano, Tehama, Trinity, and Tuolumne Counties.
- Who sponsors SB 1313?
- SB 1313 is sponsored by Nielsen.
- What is the current status of SB 1313?
- This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1313?
- Track SB 1313 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1313
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1313
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →