California 2013-2014 Regular Session Status: In Committee

AB 200 — Education finance: categorical programs.

Last action — From committee without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

(1) Existing law establishes various categorical education programs, and appropriates the funding for those programs in the annual Budget Act. Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction, for the 2008–09 to 2014–15 fiscal years, inclusive, to apportion from the amounts provided in the annual Budget Act for specified categorical education programs an amount based on the relative proportion that the local educational agency received in the 2008–09 fiscal year for those programs and authorizes local educational agencies, for those fiscal years, to use these funds, with specified exceptions, for any educational purpose, to the extent permitted by federal law. Existing law requires a school district that receives funding on behalf of a charter school pursuant to certain provisions, for the 2008–09 to 2014–15 fiscal years, inclusive, to continue to distribute the funds to those charter schools based on the same relative proportion that the school district distributed in the 2007–08 fiscal year, as adjusted by the school district to reflect changes in charter school attendance in the school district. Existing law requires a local educational agency to report expenditures of these funds to the State Department of Education. Existing law also requires the Superintendent, for the 2010–11 to 2014–15 fiscal years, inclusive, to allocate a supplemental categorical block grant to a charter school that began operation on or after the 2008–09 fiscal year, as specified. This bill would delete the 2014–15 fiscal year termination dates and would require, commencing with the 2014–15 fiscal year, the apportionments from the categorical education programs, as described above, to be apportioned to recipients by multiplying the recipient's per-pupil rate, calculated as specified, by the recipient's current fiscal year average daily attendance. The bill would also require the department to adopt uniform definitions for reporting the expenditure of the funds and would require a local educational agency, as a condition of receiving the funds, to (A) report the expenditure of those funds to the department, as specified, and (B) post information on the Internet Web site of the local educational agency on the expenditure of the funds at the school district level on a per pupil basis and identify separately the amount expended at each schoolsite on a per pupil basis. By requiring school districts to continue to distribute funds to charter schools, as discussed above, beyond the 2014–15 fiscal year, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. From committee without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).

  2. In committee: Set, final hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  3. In committee: Set second hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.

  4. Re-referred to Com. on ED.

  5. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.

  6. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  7. Re-referred to Com. on ED.

  8. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.

  9. Re-referred to Com. on ED.

  10. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.

  11. Referred to Com. on ED.

  12. From printer. May be heard in committee March 1.

  13. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Hagman · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Hagman

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Subjects

finance education
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 200 do?
(1) Existing law establishes various categorical education programs, and appropriates the funding for those programs in the annual Budget Act. Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction, for the 2008–09 to 2014–15 fiscal years, inclusive, to apportion from the amounts provided in the annual Budget Act for specified categorical education programs an amount based on the relative proportion that the local educational agency received in the 2008–09 fiscal year for those programs and authorizes local educational agencies, for those fiscal years, to use these funds, with specified exceptions, for any educational purpose, to the extent permitted by federal law. Existing law requires a school district that receives funding on behalf of a charter school pursuant to certain provisions, for the 2008–09 to 2014–15 fiscal years, inclusive, to continue to distribute the funds to those charter schools based on the same relative proportion that the school district distributed in the 2007–08 fiscal year, as adjusted by the school district to reflect changes in charter school attendance in the school district. Existing law requires a local educational agency to report expenditures of these funds to the State Department of Education. Existing law also requires the Superintendent, for the 2010–11 to 2014–15 fiscal years, inclusive, to allocate a supplemental categorical block grant to a charter school that began operation on or after the 2008–09 fiscal year, as specified. This bill would delete the 2014–15 fiscal year termination dates and would require, commencing with the 2014–15 fiscal year, the apportionments from the categorical education programs, as described above, to be apportioned to recipients by multiplying the recipient's per-pupil rate, calculated as specified, by the recipient's current fiscal year average daily attendance. The bill would also require the department to adopt uniform definitions for reporting the expenditure of the funds and would require a local educational agency, as a condition of receiving the funds, to (A) report the expenditure of those funds to the department, as specified, and (B) post information on the Internet Web site of the local educational agency on the expenditure of the funds at the school district level on a per pupil basis and identify separately the amount expended at each schoolsite on a per pupil basis. By requiring school districts to continue to distribute funds to charter schools, as discussed above, beyond the 2014–15 fiscal year, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Who sponsors AB 200?
AB 200 is sponsored by Hagman.
What is the current status of AB 200?
This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 200?
Track AB 200 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 200

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 200

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →