Crime victim compensation: financial elder or dependent adult abuse.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 847 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 847.
You're tracking SB 847
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 847 — Crime victim compensation: financial elder or dependent adult abuse.
Last action — From committee without further action.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law provides for the compensation of victims and derivative victims of specified types of crimes by the California Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board from the Restitution Fund, a continuously appropriated fund, for specified losses suffered as a result of those crimes. Existing law sets forth eligibility requirements and specified limits on the amount of compensation the board may award. This bill would include victims of financial elder or dependent adult abuse within the definition of crimes that are eligible for compensation under these provisions, as specified, and provide reimbursement for financial counseling, as specified, for those victims. The bill would make a derivative victim ineligible for compensation if the only crime the victim suffered was financial elder or dependent adult abuse. The bill would also provide related legislative findings and declarations. By expanding the authorization for the use of moneys in the Restitution Fund, a continuously appropriated fund, this bill would make an appropriation.
Bill Text
- Amended 03/24/14 - Amended Senate Current pdf March 24, 2014
- Introduced 01/09/14 - Introduced pdf January 09, 2014
- SB847 View text html
Action History
-
From committee without further action.
-
Held in committee and under submission.
-
Set for hearing May 23.
-
Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
Set for hearing April 28.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3093.) (April 8). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing April 8.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after February 9.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Block · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Block
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 847 do?
- Existing law provides for the compensation of victims and derivative victims of specified types of crimes by the California Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board from the Restitution Fund, a continuously appropriated fund, for specified losses suffered as a result of those crimes. Existing law sets forth eligibility requirements and specified limits on the amount of compensation the board may award. This bill would include victims of financial elder or dependent adult abuse within the definition of crimes that are eligible for compensation under these provisions, as specified, and provide reimbursement for financial counseling, as specified, for those victims. The bill would make a derivative victim ineligible for compensation if the only crime the victim suffered was financial elder or dependent adult abuse. The bill would also provide related legislative findings and declarations. By expanding the authorization for the use of moneys in the Restitution Fund, a continuously appropriated fund, this bill would make an appropriation.
- Who sponsors SB 847?
- SB 847 is sponsored by Block.
- What is the current status of SB 847?
- This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 847?
- Track SB 847 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 847
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 847
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →