California 2013-2014 Regular Session Status: Introduced

AB 1111 — Courts: subpoenas.

Last action — Died at Desk.

  1. 1
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

The California Constitution establishes the Commission on Judicial Performance and the Judicial Council. Existing law authorizes the commission to investigate the conduct or performance of any retired judge serving on senior judge status pursuant to rules adopted by the Judicial Council. In the course of an investigation described above, the commission or special masters appointed by the Supreme Court may, among other things, issue subpoenas for the attendance of witnesses and the production of relevant materials and testimony, as specified. Existing law provides that if a person refuses to comply with the subpoena, the commission or the masters may petition a superior court, as specified, for an order compelling the person to attend or testify or to produce the writings or things required by the subpoena. Existing law provides that if the person fails to obey the order, that person shall be punishable for contempt of court. This bill would make technical, nonsubstantive changes to these provisions.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

1 added · 1 removed

1 line(s) added, 1 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBill Information PDF2 Bill PDF |Add To My Favorites | Version:
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill Text PDF2 Bill PDF |Add To My Favorites | Version:
⬇ Download PDF
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Died at Desk.

  2. Read first time.

  3. From printer. May be heard in committee March 26.

  4. Introduced. To print.

Sponsors

  • Wieckowski · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Wieckowski

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

public-safety
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 1111 do?
The California Constitution establishes the Commission on Judicial Performance and the Judicial Council. Existing law authorizes the commission to investigate the conduct or performance of any retired judge serving on senior judge status pursuant to rules adopted by the Judicial Council. In the course of an investigation described above, the commission or special masters appointed by the Supreme Court may, among other things, issue subpoenas for the attendance of witnesses and the production of relevant materials and testimony, as specified. Existing law provides that if a person refuses to comply with the subpoena, the commission or the masters may petition a superior court, as specified, for an order compelling the person to attend or testify or to produce the writings or things required by the subpoena. Existing law provides that if the person fails to obey the order, that person shall be punishable for contempt of court. This bill would make technical, nonsubstantive changes to these provisions.
Who sponsors AB 1111?
AB 1111 is sponsored by Wieckowski.
What is the current status of AB 1111?
This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 1111?
Track AB 1111 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 1111

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 1111

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →