AB 183 — Delta Protection Commission: executive director: comprehensive long-term resource management plan: determination of consistency.
Last action — From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law, the Johnston-Baker-Andal-Boatwright Delta Protection Act of 1992, requires the Delta Protection Commission to review and maintain a comprehensive long-term resource management plan for land uses within the primary zone, as defined, of the Delta. Existing law authorizes any person who is aggrieved by any action taken by a local government or other local agency in implementing the resource management plan to file an appeal with the commission, or for the commission to review, in the absence of an appeal by an aggrieved person, the action taken. Existing law requires the commission to review the action on the grounds that the action as to land located exclusively within the primary zone is inconsistent with the resource management plan, the approved portions of local government general plans that implement the resource management plan, or specified law. Existing law requires the appeal to be heard by the commission, as prescribed, unless the commission, either itself or by delegation to the executive director, determines that the issue raised on appeal is not within the commission's jurisdiction or does not raise an appealable issue. This bill would require the executive director to determine a discretionary project located in the primary zone to be consistent with the resource management plan provided that the project satisfies at least 4 of 5 specified criteria.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removed1 line(s) added, 1 removed.
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBillText Information PDF2 Bill PDF |Add To My Favorites | Version:
View plain text versions (2)
- Introduced 01/28/13 - Introduced Current pdf January 28, 2013
- AB183 View text html
Action History
-
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
-
Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Referred to Coms. on W.,P. & W. and NAT. RES.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee February 28.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Dickinson · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Dickinson
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 183 do?
- Existing law, the Johnston-Baker-Andal-Boatwright Delta Protection Act of 1992, requires the Delta Protection Commission to review and maintain a comprehensive long-term resource management plan for land uses within the primary zone, as defined, of the Delta. Existing law authorizes any person who is aggrieved by any action taken by a local government or other local agency in implementing the resource management plan to file an appeal with the commission, or for the commission to review, in the absence of an appeal by an aggrieved person, the action taken. Existing law requires the commission to review the action on the grounds that the action as to land located exclusively within the primary zone is inconsistent with the resource management plan, the approved portions of local government general plans that implement the resource management plan, or specified law. Existing law requires the appeal to be heard by the commission, as prescribed, unless the commission, either itself or by delegation to the executive director, determines that the issue raised on appeal is not within the commission's jurisdiction or does not raise an appealable issue. This bill would require the executive director to determine a discretionary project located in the primary zone to be consistent with the resource management plan provided that the project satisfies at least 4 of 5 specified criteria.
- Who sponsors AB 183?
- AB 183 is sponsored by Dickinson.
- What is the current status of AB 183?
- This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 183?
- Track AB 183 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 183
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 183
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →