SB 389 — South Coast Air Quality Management District: electric generating facilities: emissions offsets.
Last action — Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law establishes the South Coast Air Quality Management District (district) vested with the authority to regulate air emissions from stationary sources located in the South Coast Air Basin and establishes a district board to govern the district. Existing regulations of the district exempt the replacement of specified electric utility steam boilers at electric generating facilities from specified emissions offset requirements and allow those facilities to use, at no cost, emissions offset credits from the district's internal emissions offset accounts to offset any emissions increase associated with those projects. This bill would prohibit the district, on and after February 1, 2013, from charging a fee for the transfer of an emissions offset from the district's internal emissions offset account to offset any emissions increase from the replacement of electric utility steam boilers at electric generating facilities, pursuant to a specified south coast district regulation. By adding to the duties of a local agency, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removed1 line(s) added, 1 removed.
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBillText Information PDF2 Bill PDF |Add To My Favorites | Version:
View plain text versions (2)
- Introduced 02/20/13 - Introduced Current pdf February 20, 2013
- SB389 View text html
Action History
-
Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).
-
Set, first hearing. Failed passage in committee. (Ayes 4. Noes 5. Page 788.)
-
Set for hearing May 1.
-
Set, first hearing. Failed passage in committee. (Ayes 4. Noes 4. Page 565.) Reconsideration granted.
-
Set for hearing April 17.
-
Referred to Com. on E.Q.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 23.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Wright · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Wright
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 44% | 56% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Pavley | — | Nay |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Nay |
| Leno | — | Nay |
| Hancock | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 44% | 44% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Pavley | — | Not Voting |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Nay |
| Hill | — | Nay |
| Leno | — | Nay |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Pavley | — | Not Voting |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 389 do?
- Existing law establishes the South Coast Air Quality Management District (district) vested with the authority to regulate air emissions from stationary sources located in the South Coast Air Basin and establishes a district board to govern the district. Existing regulations of the district exempt the replacement of specified electric utility steam boilers at electric generating facilities from specified emissions offset requirements and allow those facilities to use, at no cost, emissions offset credits from the district's internal emissions offset accounts to offset any emissions increase associated with those projects. This bill would prohibit the district, on and after February 1, 2013, from charging a fee for the transfer of an emissions offset from the district's internal emissions offset account to offset any emissions increase from the replacement of electric utility steam boilers at electric generating facilities, pursuant to a specified south coast district regulation. By adding to the duties of a local agency, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
- Who sponsors SB 389?
- SB 389 is sponsored by Wright.
- What is the current status of SB 389?
- This bill died with 2013-2014 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 389?
- Track SB 389 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 389
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 389
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →